Browsing by Author "Poon, Eric G"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics.(Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018-08) Ding, Xiruo; Gellad, Ziad F; Mather, Chad; Barth, Pamela; Poon, Eric G; Newman, Mark; Goldstein, Benjamin AObjective:As available data increases, so does the opportunity to develop risk scores on more refined patient populations. In this paper we assessed the ability to derive a risk score for a patient no-showing to a clinic visit. Methods:Using data from 2 264 235 outpatient appointments we assessed the performance of models built across 14 different specialties and 55 clinics. We used regularized logistic regression models to fit and assess models built on the health system, specialty, and clinic levels. We evaluated fits based on their discrimination and calibration. Results:Overall, the results suggest that a relatively robust risk score for patient no-shows could be derived with an average C-statistic of 0.83 across clinic level models and strong calibration. Moreover, the clinic specific models, even with lower training set sizes, often performed better than the more general models. Examination of the individual models showed that risk factors had different degrees of predictability across the different specialties. Implementation of optimal modeling strategies would lead to capturing an additional 4819 no-shows per-year. Conclusion:Overall, this work highlights both the opportunity for and the importance of leveraging the available electronic health record data to develop more refined risk models.Item Open Access Overcoming barriers to the adoption and implementation of predictive modeling and machine learning in clinical care: what can we learn from US academic medical centers?(JAMIA open, 2020-07) Watson, Joshua; Hutyra, Carolyn A; Clancy, Shayna M; Chandiramani, Anisha; Bedoya, Armando; Ilangovan, Kumar; Nderitu, Nancy; Poon, Eric GThere is little known about how academic medical centers (AMCs) in the US develop, implement, and maintain predictive modeling and machine learning (PM and ML) models. We conducted semi-structured interviews with leaders from AMCs to assess their use of PM and ML in clinical care, understand associated challenges, and determine recommended best practices. Each transcribed interview was iteratively coded and reconciled by a minimum of 2 investigators to identify key barriers to and facilitators of PM and ML adoption and implementation in clinical care. Interviews were conducted with 33 individuals from 19 AMCs nationally. AMCs varied greatly in the use of PM and ML within clinical care, from some just beginning to explore their utility to others with multiple models integrated into clinical care. Informants identified 5 key barriers to the adoption and implementation of PM and ML in clinical care: (1) culture and personnel, (2) clinical utility of the PM and ML tool, (3) financing, (4) technology, and (5) data. Recommendation to the informatics community to overcome these barriers included: (1) development of robust evaluation methodologies, (2) partnership with vendors, and (3) development and dissemination of best practices. For institutions developing clinical PM and ML applications, they are advised to: (1) develop appropriate governance, (2) strengthen data access, integrity, and provenance, and (3) adhere to the 5 rights of clinical decision support. This article highlights key challenges of implementing PM and ML in clinical care at AMCs and suggests best practices for development, implementation, and maintenance at these institutions.Item Open Access Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.(Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020-06) Wosik, Jedrek; Fudim, Marat; Cameron, Blake; Gellad, Ziad F; Cho, Alex; Phinney, Donna; Curtis, Simon; Roman, Matthew; Poon, Eric G; Ferranti, Jeffrey; Katz, Jason N; Tcheng, JamesThe novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered our economy, society, and healthcare system. While this crisis has presented the U.S. healthcare delivery system with unprecedented challenges, the pandemic has catalyzed rapid adoption of telehealth, or the entire spectrum of activities used to deliver care at a distance. Using examples reported by U.S. healthcare organizations, including ours, we describe the role that telehealth has played in transforming healthcare delivery during the 3 phases of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic: (1) stay-at-home outpatient care, (2) initial COVID-19 hospital surge, and (3) postpandemic recovery. Within each of these 3 phases, we examine how people, process, and technology work together to support a successful telehealth transformation. Whether healthcare enterprises are ready or not, the new reality is that virtual care has arrived.