Browsing by Author "Pulsipher, Michael A"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Efficacy of Pharmacokinetics-Directed Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma: Comparison of a Multicenter Phase II Study and CIBMTR Outcomes.(Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2016-07) Flowers, Christopher R; Costa, Luciano J; Pasquini, Marcelo C; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer; Lill, Michael; Shore, Tsiporah B; Vaughan, William; Craig, Michael; Freytes, Cesar O; Shea, Thomas C; Horwitz, Mitchell E; Fay, Joseph W; Mineishi, Shin; Rondelli, Damiano; Mason, James; Braunschweig, Ira; Ai, Weiyun; Yeh, Rosa F; Rodriguez, Tulio E; Flinn, Ian; Comeau, Terrance; Yeager, Andrew M; Pulsipher, Michael A; Bence-Bruckler, Isabelle; Laneuville, Pierre; Bierman, Philip; Chen, Andy I; Kato, Kazunobu; Wang, Yanlin; Xu, Cong; Smith, Angela J; Waller, Edmund KBusulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This multicenter, phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of BuCyE with individually adjusted busulfan based on preconditioning pharmacokinetics. The study initially enrolled Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients ages 18 to 80 years but was amended due to high early treatment-related mortality (TRM) in patients > 65 years. BuCyE outcomes were compared with contemporaneous recipients of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Two hundred seven subjects with HL (n = 66) or NHL (n = 141) were enrolled from 32 centers in North America, and 203 underwent ASCT. Day 100 TRM for all subjects (n = 203), patients > 65 years (n = 17), and patients ≤ 65 years (n = 186) were 4.5%, 23.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 63), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 29), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23), respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) were 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL, respectively. In the matched analysis rates of 2-year TRM were 3.3% for BuCyE and 3.9% for BEAM, and there were no differences in outcomes for NHL. Patients with HL had lower rates of 2-year PFS with BuCyE, 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%), than with BEAM, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%), with no differences in TRM or OS. BuCyE provided adequate disease control and safety in B cell NHL patients ≤ 65 years but produced worse PFS in HL patients when compared with BEAM.Item Restricted Immune Reconstitution and Survival of 100 SCID Patients Post Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A PIDTC Natural History Study.(Blood, 2017-10-11) Heimall, Jennifer; Logan, Brent R; Cowan, Morton J; Notarangelo, Luigi D; Griffith, Linda M; Puck, Jennifer M; Kohn, Donald B; Pulsipher, Michael A; Parikh, Suhag; Martinez, Caridad; Kapoor, Neena; O'Reilly, Richard; Boyer, Michael; Pai, Sung-Yun; Goldman, Frederick; Burroughs, Lauri; Chandra, Sharat; Kletzel, Morris; Thakar, Monica; Connelly, James; Cuvelier, Geoff; Davila Saldana, Blachy J; Shereck, Evan; Knutsen, Alan; Sullivan, Kathleen E; DeSantes, Kenneth; Gillio, Alfred; Haddad, Elie; Petrovic, Aleksandra; Quigg, Troy; Smith, Angela R; Stenger, Elizabeth; Yin, Ziyan; Shearer, William T; Fleisher, Thomas; Buckley, Rebecca H; Dvorak, Christopher CThe Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) is enrolling children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) to a prospective natural history study. We analyzed patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from 2010-2014, including 68 with typical SCID and 32 with leaky SCID, Omenn Syndrome or Reticular Dysgenesis. Most (59%) were diagnosed by newborn screening or family history. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 90%but was 95% for those infection-free at HCT vs. 81% for those with active infection (p=0.009). Other factors, including the diagnosis of typical vs. leaky SCID/Omenn Syndrome, diagnosis via family history or newborn screening (FH/NBS), use of preparative chemotherapy, or the type of donor utilized did not impact survival. While 1-year post-HCT median CD4 counts and freedom from IVIG were improved after use of preparative chemotherapy, other immunologic reconstitution parameters were not affected and the potential for late sequelae in extremely young infants requires further evaluation. Following a T-cell-replete graft, landmark analysis at Day +100 post-HCT revealed that CD3 <300 cells/uL, CD8 <50 cells/uL, CD45RA <10%, or a restricted Vβ T cell receptor repertoire (<13 of 24 families) was associated with need for second HCT or death. In the modern era, active infection continues to pose the greatest threat to survival for SCID patients. Although NBS has been effective in diagnosing SCID patients early in life, there is an urgent need to identify validated approaches through prospective trials to ensure that patients proceed to HCT infection free. The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01186913.Item Open Access National Cancer Institute, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Consortium First International Consensus Conference on late effects after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: the need for pediatric-specific long-term follow-up guidelines.(Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2012-03) Pulsipher, Michael A; Skinner, Roderick; McDonald, George B; Hingorani, Sangeeta; Armenian, Saro H; Cooke, Kenneth R; Gracia, Clarisa; Petryk, Anna; Bhatia, Smita; Bunin, Nancy; Nieder, Michael L; Dvorak, Christopher C; Sung, Lillian; Sanders, Jean E; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Baker, K ScottExisting standards for screening and management of late effects occurring in children who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) include recommendations from pediatric cancer networks and consensus guidelines from adult-oriented transplantation societies applicable to all HCT recipients. Although these approaches have significant merit, they are not pediatric HCT-focused, and they do not address post-HCT challenges faced by children with complex nonmalignant disorders. In this article we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of current published recommendations and conclude that pediatric-specific guidelines for post-HCT screening and management would be beneficial to the long-term health of these patients and would promote late effects research in this field. Our panel of late effects experts also provides recommendations for follow-up and therapy of selected post-HCT organ and endocrine complications in pediatric patients.Item Open Access NCI, NHLBI first international consensus conference on late effects after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: state of the science, future directions.(Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2011-10) Baker, K Scott; Bhatia, Smita; Bunin, Nancy; Nieder, Michael; Dvorak, Christopher C; Sung, Lillian; Sanders, Jean E; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Pulsipher, Michael AItem Open Access Outcome of transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Down syndrome.(Pediatric blood & cancer, 2014-06) Hitzler, Johann K; He, Wensheng; Doyle, John; Cairo, Mitchell; Camitta, Bruce M; Chan, Ka Wah; Diaz Perez, Miguel A; Fraser, Christopher; Gross, Thomas G; Horan, John T; Kennedy-Nasser, Alana A; Kitko, Carrie; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Lehmann, Leslie; O'Brien, Tracey; Pulsipher, Michael A; Smith, Franklin O; Zhang, Mei-Jie; Eapen, Mary; Carpenter, Paul A; CIBMTR Pediatric Cancer Working CommitteeWe report on 27 patients with Down syndrome (DS) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) between 2000 and 2009. Seventy-eight percent of patients received myeloablative conditioning and 52% underwent transplantation in second remission. Disease-free survival (DFS) was 24% at a median of 3 years. Post-transplant leukemic relapse was more frequent than expected for children with DS-ALL (54%) than for non-DS ALL. These data suggest leukemic relapse rather than transplant toxicity is the most important cause of treatment failure. Advancements in leukemia control are especially needed for improvement in HCT outcomes for DS-ALL.Item Open Access Outcome of transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in children with Down syndrome.(Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013-06) Hitzler, Johann K; He, Wensheng; Doyle, John; Cairo, Mitchell; Camitta, Bruce M; Chan, Ka Wah; Diaz Perez, Miguel A; Fraser, Christopher; Gross, Thomas G; Horan, John T; Kennedy-Nasser, Alana A; Kitko, Carrie; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Lehmann, Leslie; O'Brien, Tracey; Pulsipher, Michael A; Smith, Franklin O; Zhang, Mei-Jie; Eapen, Mary; Carpenter, Paul A; CIBMTR Pediatric Cancer Working CommitteeData on outcomes of allogeneic transplantation in children with Down syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia (DS-AML) are scarce and conflicting. Early reports stress treatment-related mortality as the main barrier; a recent case series points to posttransplantation relapse. We reviewed outcome data for 28 patients with DS-AML reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 2000 and 2009 and performed a first matched-pair analysis of 21 patients with DS-AML and 80 non-DS AML controls. The median age at transplantation for DS-AML was 3 years, and almost half of the cohort was in second remission. The 3-year probability of overall survival was only 19%. In multivariate analysis, adjusting for interval from diagnosis to transplantation, risks of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 2.84; P < .001; 62% versus 37%) and transplant-related mortality (HR, 2.52; P = .04; 24% versus 15%) were significantly higher for DS-AML compared to non-DS AML. Overall mortality risk (HR, 2.86; P < .001; 21% versus 52%) was significantly higher for DS-AML. Both transplant-related mortality and relapse contribute to higher mortality. Excess mortality in DS-AML patients can only effectively be addressed through an international multicenter effort to pilot strategies aimed at lowering both transplant-related mortality and relapse risks.Item Open Access Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.(Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021-08) Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A; Kumar, Ambuj; Ayala, Ernesto; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Nishihori, Taiga; Marsh, Rebecca; Burroughs, Lauri M; Majhail, Navneet; Al-Homsi, A Samer; Al-Kadhimi, Zaid S; Bar, Merav; Bertaina, Alice; Boelens, Jaap J; Champlin, Richard; Chaudhury, Sonali; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai; El-Jawahri, Areej; Fanning, Suzanne; Fraint, Ellen; Gergis, Usama; Giralt, Sergio; Hamilton, Betty K; Hashmi, Shahrukh K; Horn, Biljana; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Jacobsohn, David A; Jain, Tania; Johnston, Laura; Kanate, Abraham S; Kansagra, Ankit; Kassim, Adetola; Kean, Leslie S; Kitko, Carrie L; Knight-Perry, Jessica; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Liu, Hien; MacMillan, Margaret L; Mahmoudjafari, Zahra; Mielcarek, Marco; Mohty, Mohamad; Nagler, Arnon; Nemecek, Eneida; Olson, Timothy S; Oran, Betul; Perales, Miguel-Angel; Prockop, Susan E; Pulsipher, Michael A; Pusic, Iskra; Riches, Marcie L; Rodriguez, Cesar; Romee, Rizwan; Rondon, Gabriela; Saad, Ayman; Shah, Nina; Shaw, Peter J; Shenoy, Shalini; Sierra, Jorge; Talano, Julie; Verneris, Michael R; Veys, Paul; Wagner, John E; Savani, Bipin N; Hamadani, Mehdi; Carpenter, Paul AAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for certain hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. The field of allo-HCT has witnessed significant advances, including broadening indications for transplantation, availability of alternative donor sources, less toxic preparative regimens, new cell manipulation techniques, and novel GVHD prevention methods, all of which have expanded the applicability of the procedure. These advances have led to clinical practice conundrums when applying traditional definitions of hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, because these may vary based on donor type, cell source, cell dose, primary disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and conditioning intensity, among other variables. To address these contemporary challenges, we surveyed a panel of allo-HCT experts in an attempt to standardize these definitions. We analyzed survey responses from adult and pediatric transplantation physicians separately. Consensus was achieved for definitions of neutrophil and platelet recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, but not for delayed engraftment. Here we highlight the complexities associated with the management of mixed donor chimerism in malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases, which remains an area for future research. We recognize that there are multiple other specific, and at times complex, clinical scenarios for which clinical management must be individualized.