Browsing by Author "Reilly, Kelly"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Barriers for Municipalities to Federal Funding for Flood Mitigation
    (2020-05) Reilly, Kelly
    In North Carolina, flooding is a significant and costly problem for many counties. Efforts to mitigate flooding damage or incidence take a number of forms, including property buyouts and traditional and natural infrastructure projects, many of which can be costly for counties. There are a number of federal programs designed to fund the range of mitigative measures, dependent on the type of project or assessment of risk for the municipality. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) wants to know the answer to a key policy question related to flood mitigation: what are the barriers, if any, limiting the utilization by local governments in North Carolina of federally available funds for mitigative projects aimed at preventing flood damage? If so, how should EDF prioritize their partnerships, planning, and resources in providing solutions to lessen these barriers?
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    State of the Coast: A Review of Coastal Management Policies for Six States
    (2023-01-17) Karasik, Rachel; Pickle, Amy; O’Shea, Maggie; Reilly, Kelly; Bruce, Molly; Earnhardt, Rachel; Ahmed, Iqra
    This analysis of coastal habitat policy in six US states—California, Florida, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington—aims to identify promising policy approaches for improved protection and restoration of oyster reefs, mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass.   Coastal habitats provide critical environmental, economic, and recreational services valued at billions of dollars in the United States alone. However, the quantity and quality of most coastal habitats have been under decline for centuries due to a variety of threats. Coordinated policy responses across levels of government are required for protection and restoration of coastal habitats because they do not have discrete jurisdictional boundaries and are often harmed by distant anthropogenic activities.   The analysis finds that state-level management is principally guided by federal coastal protection and management statutes, namely the Clean Water Act and Coastal Zone Management Act. State and federal policies are rarely habitat-specific and do not comprehensively address threats, which can result in a fragmented policy landscape that struggles to meet habitat protection and restoration goals. With limited long-term monitoring data and few effectiveness studies, our ability to understand which policy levers work and the extent to which they can be replicated in other states is limited.   A successful path forward may be found through local initiatives tailored and designed for their local context that have effectively restored degraded habitats and employed innovative regulatory mechanisms intended to streamline the permitting process for restoration. Dedicated funding for sustained, long-term monitoring to best understand the effects and outcomes of habitat protection and restoration policy efforts will also be critical to identify enabling conditions and replicate effective measures in similar contexts.   The Pew Charitable Trusts supported the development of this report. Pew is not responsible for any inaccuracies and does not necessarily endorse the findings.