Browsing by Author "Rockhold, Frank W"

Now showing 1 - 20 of 29

Open Access
10 Years with ICH E10: Choice of Control Groups.
(Pharm Stat, 2011-09) Rockhold, Frank W; Enas, Gregory G
Open Access
A Framework for Safety Evaluation Throughout the Product Development Life-Cycle
(Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 2019-01-01) Ball, Greg; Reblin, Tjark; Buchanan, James; Hendrickson, Barbara A; Lewis, Eric; Schnell, Patrick M; Rockhold, Frank W
© 2019, The Drug Information Association, Inc. Evaluation of the safety profile of medicines is moving from a more reactive approach, where safety experts and statisticians have been primarily focusing on the review of clinical trial data and spontaneous reports, to a more proactive endeavor with cross-functional teams strategically evolving their understanding of the safety profile. They do this by anticipating the ultimate benefit–risk profile and its related risk management implications from the start of development. The proposed approach is based on assessments of integrated program-level safety data. These data stem from multiple sources such as preclinical information; clinical and spontaneous adverse event reports; epidemiological, real-world, and registry data; as well as, potentially, data from social media. Blended qualitative and quantitative evaluations allow integration of data from diverse sources. Adding to this, a collaborative multidisciplinary view, which is focused on continuous learning and decision-making via diverse safety management teams, ensures that companies look at their growing safety database and associated risk management implications from every relevant perspective. This multifaceted and iterative approach starts early in the development of a new medicine, continues into the post-marketing setting, and wanes as the product matures and the safety profile becomes more well understood. Not only does this satisfy regulatory requirements but, crucially, it provides the healthcare system and treated patients with a better understanding of the drug’s safety profile.
Open Access
Acute Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease.
(Circulation, 2019-08) Hess, Connie N; Huang, Zhen; Patel, Manesh R; Baumgartner, Iris; Berger, Jeffrey S; Blomster, Juuso I; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Held, Peter; Jones, W Schuyler; Katona, Brian; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Norgren, Lars; Rockhold, Frank W; Hiatt, William R
BACKGROUND:Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an important clinical event and an emerging cardiovascular clinical trial outcome. Risk factors for and outcomes after ALI have not been fully evaluated. METHODS:EUCLID (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Artery Disease) randomized patients with peripheral artery disease to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Enrollment criteria included an ankle-brachial index ≤0.80 or previous lower extremity revascularization. Patients were grouped according to the primary outcome, postrandomization ALI hospitalization. Baseline factors associated with ALI were identified using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Models with ALI hospitalization as a time-dependent covariate were developed for secondary outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke), all-cause mortality, and major amputation. RESULTS:Among 13 885 patients, 1.7% (n=232) had 293 ALI hospitalizations (0.8 per 100 patient-years). Patients with versus without ALI were younger and more often had previous peripheral revascularization and lower baseline ankle-brachial index. Treatment during ALI hospitalization included endovascular revascularization (39.2%, n=115), surgical bypass (24.6%, n=72), and major amputation (13.0%, n=38). After multivariable adjustment, any previous peripheral revascularization (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.7, 95% CI 3.3-6.8, P<0.01), baseline atrial fibrillation (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, P=0.03), and baseline ankle-brachial index ≤0.60 (HR 1.3 per 0.10 decrease, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, P<0.01) were associated with higher ALI risk. Older age (HR 0.8 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, P=0.02) and baseline statin use (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, P<0.01) were associated with lower risk for ALI. There was no relationship between randomized treatment to ticagrelor or clopidogrel and ALI. Among patients with previous revascularization, surgical versus endovascular procedures performed more than 6 months prior were associated with ALI (adjusted HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.75-3.96). In the overall population, ALI hospitalization was associated with subsequent MACE (adjusted HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.1, P=0.04), all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.4-4.6, P<0.01), and major amputation (adjusted HR 34.2, 95% CI 9.7-20.8, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Previous peripheral revascularization, baseline atrial fibrillation, and lower ankle-brachial index identify peripheral artery disease patients at heightened risk for ALI, an event associated with subsequent cardiovascular and limb-related morbidity and mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01732822.
Open Access
Author Correction: Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
(Nature communications, 2024-02) Axfors, Cathrine; Schmitt, Andreas M; Janiaud, Perrine; Van't Hooft, Janneke; Abd-Elsalam, Sherief; Abdo, Ehab F; Abella, Benjamin S; Akram, Javed; Amaravadi, Ravi K; Angus, Derek C; Arabi, Yaseen M; Azhar, Shehnoor; Baden, Lindsey R; Baker, Arthur W; Belkhir, Leila; Benfield, Thomas; Berrevoets, Marvin AH; Chen, Cheng-Pin; Chen, Tsung-Chia; Cheng, Shu-Hsing; Cheng, Chien-Yu; Chung, Wei-Sheng; Cohen, Yehuda Z; Cowan, Lisa N; Dalgard, Olav; de Almeida E Val, Fernando F; de Lacerda, Marcus VG; de Melo, Gisely C; Derde, Lennie; Dubee, Vincent; Elfakir, Anissa; Gordon, Anthony C; Hernandez-Cardenas, Carmen M; Hills, Thomas; Hoepelman, Andy IM; Huang, Yi-Wen; Igau, Bruno; Jin, Ronghua; Jurado-Camacho, Felipe; Khan, Khalid S; Kremsner, Peter G; Kreuels, Benno; Kuo, Cheng-Yu; Le, Thuy; Lin, Yi-Chun; Lin, Wu-Pu; Lin, Tse-Hung; Lyngbakken, Magnus Nakrem; McArthur, Colin; McVerry, Bryan J; Meza-Meneses, Patricia; Monteiro, Wuelton M; Morpeth, Susan C; Mourad, Ahmad; Mulligan, Mark J; Murthy, Srinivas; Naggie, Susanna; Narayanasamy, Shanti; Nichol, Alistair; Novack, Lewis A; O'Brien, Sean M; Okeke, Nwora Lance; Perez, Léna; Perez-Padilla, Rogelio; Perrin, Laurent; Remigio-Luna, Arantxa; Rivera-Martinez, Norma E; Rockhold, Frank W; Rodriguez-Llamazares, Sebastian; Rolfe, Robert; Rosa, Rossana; Røsjø, Helge; Sampaio, Vanderson S; Seto, Todd B; Shahzad, Muhammad; Soliman, Shaimaa; Stout, Jason E; Thirion-Romero, Ireri; Troxel, Andrea B; Tseng, Ting-Yu; Turner, Nicholas A; Ulrich, Robert J; Walsh, Stephen R; Webb, Steve A; Weehuizen, Jesper M; Velinova, Maria; Wong, Hon-Lai; Wrenn, Rebekah; Zampieri, Fernando G; Zhong, Wu; Moher, David; Goodman, Steven N; Ioannidis, John PA; Hemkens, Lars G
Correction to: Nature Communicationshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22446-z, published online 15 April 2021 The original version of this article contained an error in Table 1, which misidentified the trial included in the meta-analysis registered as NCT04323527 as CloroCOVID19II instead of CloroCOVID19III. The NCT04323527 registration includes the trials CloroCOVID19I and CloroCOVID19III. CloroCOVID19I was not included in the meta-analysis. In addition, the original version of the Methods section inadvertently omitted details of which formulations of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine the reported dosages refer to. The following information has been included in the legend for Table 1 and in the corrected methods section: “In all trials that used hydroxychloroquine, dosages refer to hydroxychloroquine sulfate. In trials that used chloroquine, the dosages for ARCHAIC, ChiCTR2000030054 and ChiCTR2000031204 refer to chloroquine phosphate, while those for CloroCOVID19II and CloroCOVID19III refer to chloroquine base. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene has issued a retraction note (1) for one of the trials (2) that had been included in the calculations of our meta-analysis. Exclusion of the data from this trial changes neither the results nor inferences of the meta-analysis. For hydroxychloroquine, the original odds ratio for mortality was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02–1.20; I2 = 0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and excluding the retracted trial the odds ratio for mortality would remain 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02–1.20, I2 = 0%; 25 trials; 9818 patients). Retraction Notice. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 107, 728-728, https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1073ret (2022). Abd-Elsalam, S. et al. RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103, 1635-1639, https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0873 (2020). The errors in Table 1 and in the Methods section have been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Open Access
Author Correction: Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
(Nature communications, 2021-05-14) Axfors, Cathrine; Schmitt, Andreas M; Janiaud, Perrine; Van't Hooft, Janneke; Abd-Elsalam, Sherief; Abdo, Ehab F; Abella, Benjamin S; Akram, Javed; Amaravadi, Ravi K; Angus, Derek C; Arabi, Yaseen M; Azhar, Shehnoor; Baden, Lindsey R; Baker, Arthur W; Belkhir, Leila; Benfield, Thomas; Berrevoets, Marvin AH; Chen, Cheng-Pin; Chen, Tsung-Chia; Cheng, Shu-Hsing; Cheng, Chien-Yu; Chung, Wei-Sheng; Cohen, Yehuda Z; Cowan, Lisa N; Dalgard, Olav; de Almeida E Val, Fernando F; de Lacerda, Marcus VG; de Melo, Gisely C; Derde, Lennie; Dubee, Vincent; Elfakir, Anissa; Gordon, Anthony C; Hernandez-Cardenas, Carmen M; Hills, Thomas; Hoepelman, Andy IM; Huang, Yi-Wen; Igau, Bruno; Jin, Ronghua; Jurado-Camacho, Felipe; Khan, Khalid S; Kremsner, Peter G; Kreuels, Benno; Kuo, Cheng-Yu; Le, Thuy; Lin, Yi-Chun; Lin, Wu-Pu; Lin, Tse-Hung; Lyngbakken, Magnus Nakrem; McArthur, Colin; McVerry, Bryan J; Meza-Meneses, Patricia; Monteiro, Wuelton M; Morpeth, Susan C; Mourad, Ahmad; Mulligan, Mark J; Murthy, Srinivas; Naggie, Susanna; Narayanasamy, Shanti; Nichol, Alistair; Novack, Lewis A; O'Brien, Sean M; Okeke, Nwora Lance; Perez, Léna; Perez-Padilla, Rogelio; Perrin, Laurent; Remigio-Luna, Arantxa; Rivera-Martinez, Norma E; Rockhold, Frank W; Rodriguez-Llamazares, Sebastian; Rolfe, Robert; Rosa, Rossana; Røsjø, Helge; Sampaio, Vanderson S; Seto, Todd B; Shahzad, Muhammad; Soliman, Shaimaa; Stout, Jason E; Thirion-Romero, Ireri; Troxel, Andrea B; Tseng, Ting-Yu; Turner, Nicholas A; Ulrich, Robert J; Walsh, Stephen R; Webb, Steve A; Weehuizen, Jesper M; Velinova, Maria; Wong, Hon-Lai; Wrenn, Rebekah; Zampieri, Fernando G; Zhong, Wu; Moher, David; Goodman, Steven N; Ioannidis, John PA; Hemkens, Lars G
The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Muhammad Shahzad, which was incorrectly given as Muhammad Shehzad. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Open Access
Cardiovascular and Limb Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: The EUCLID Trial.
(Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018-12) Low Wang, Cecilia C; Blomster, Juuso I; Heizer, Gretchen; Berger, Jeffrey S; Baumgartner, Iris; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Held, Peter; Katona, Brian G; Norgren, Lars; Jones, W Schuyler; Lopes, Renato D; Olin, Jeffrey W; Rockhold, Frank W; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Patel, Manesh R; Hiatt, William R; EUCLID Trial Executive Committee and Investigators
BACKGROUND:Diabetes confers an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but less is known about the independent risk diabetes confers on major cardiovascular and limb events in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) on contemporary management. OBJECTIVES:The authors sought to assess the risk of cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD and diabetes as compared with those with PAD alone. METHODS:In the EUCLID (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Artery Disease) trial, 13,885 patients with symptomatic PAD were evaluated with a primary endpoint of an adjudicated composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) followed over a median of ∼30 months. The diabetes subgroup was analyzed compared with the subgroup without diabetes, and further examined for diabetes-specific factors such as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) that might affect risk for major cardiovascular and limb outcomes. RESULTS:A total of 5,345 patients (38.5%) had diabetes; the majority (n = 5,134 [96.1%]) had type 2 diabetes. The primary endpoint occurred in 15.9% of patients with PAD and diabetes as compared with 10.4% of those without diabetes (absolute risk difference 5.5%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41 to 1.72; p < 0.001). Every 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with a 14.2% increased relative risk for MACE (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.20; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with PAD and diabetes are at high risk for cardiovascular and limb ischemic events, even on contemporary therapies. Every 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with a 14.2% increased relative risk for MACE (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.20; p < 0.0001). (A Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease [EUCLID]; NCT01732822).
Open Access
Cardiovascular Outcomes After Lower Extremity Endovascular or Surgical Revascularization: The EUCLID Trial.
(Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018-10) Baumgartner, Iris; Norgren, Lars; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Mulder, Hillary; Patel, Manesh R; Berger, Jeffrey S; Jones, W Schuyler; Rockhold, Frank W; Katona, Brian G; Mahaffey, Kenneth; Hiatt, William R; Executive Committee and Investigators of the EUCLID Trial
BACKGROUND:Lower extremity revascularization (LER) is a common treatment in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), but long-term outcomes are poorly defined. OBJECTIVES:The aim was to analyze LER in the EUCLID (Examining Use of tiCagreLor In paD) trial to determine predictors and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS:Patients were grouped according to whether they received a post-randomization LER (n = 1,738) or not (n = 12,147). All variables were assessed for significance in univariable and parsimonious multivariable models. The primary endpoint was myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death; major adverse limb events (MALE) included acute limb ischemia or major amputation. RESULTS:A post-randomization LER occurred in 12.5% of patients and was an endovascular LER in 74.7%. Endovascular LERs were performed more often in North America, whereas surgical procedures occurred more frequently in Europe. Independent factors predicting LER were prior and type of prior LER, geographic region, limb symptoms, diabetes, and smoking. A post-randomization LER was associated with an increased risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 1.90; p < 0.0001) and MALE (hazard ratio: 12.0; 95% confidence interval: 9.47 to 15.30; p < 0.0001). Event rates for the primary endpoint after LER were numerically higher in the surgical subgroup, but MALE were similar between surgical and endovascular LER. CONCLUSIONS:In the EUCLID trial, LER was most often endovascular. Following LER, there was an increased hazard for the primary endpoint (with higher event rates in the surgical group) and a markedly increased risk for MALE events (with similar event rates between surgical and endovascular LER procedures). (A Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease [EUCLID]; NCT01732822).
Open Access
Chronic kidney disease and risk for cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: The EUCLID trial
(Vascular Medicine) Hopley, Charles W; Kavanagh, Sarah; Patel, Manesh R; Ostrom, Cara; Baumgartner, Iris; Berger, Jeffrey S; Blomster, Juuso I; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Jones, W Schuyler; Katona, Brian G; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Norgren, Lars; Rockhold, Frank W; Hiatt, William R
In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on major adverse cardiovascular events has not been fully evaluated. The Examining Use of Ticagrelor In PAD (EUCLID) trial randomized 13,885 patients with PAD to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. This post hoc analysis compared the incidence of the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemic stroke) in patients with CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) with those without CKD (eGFR ⩾ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) major bleeding. A total of 13,483 patients were included; 3332 (25%) had CKD, of whom 237 had stage 4/5 disease. Median follow-up was approximately 30 months. After statistical adjustment, patients with CKD had a higher rate of the primary endpoint compared with those without CKD (6.75 vs 3.72 events/100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.45, 95% CI 1.30–1.63). CKD was not associated with increased risk of hospitalization for acute limb ischemia (ALI) (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.69–1.34) or major amputation (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66–1.28). CKD was not associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89–1.64), but minor bleeding was significantly increased (adjusted HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07–2.15). In conclusion, patients with PAD and CKD had higher rates of cardiovascular death, MI, and ischemic stroke, but similar rates of ALI, major amputation, and TIMI major bleeding when compared with patients without CKD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822
Open Access
Clinical trials registration.
(PLoS Med, 2006-03) Rockhold, Frank W; Krall, Ronald L
Open Access
COVID-19 Trials: Who Participates and Who Benefits?
(Southern medical journal, 2022-04) Narayanasamy, Shanti; Mourad, Ahmad; Turner, Nicholas A; Le, Thuy; Rolfe, Robert J; Okeke, Nwora Lance; O'Brien, Sean M; Baker, Arthur W; Wrenn, Rebekah; Rosa, Rossana; Rockhold, Frank W; Naggie, Susanna; Stout, Jason E
Objectives
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately afflicted vulnerable populations. Older adults, particularly residents of nursing facilities, represent a small percentage of the population but account for 40% of mortality from COVID-19 in the United States. Racial and ethnic minority individuals, particularly Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous Americans have experienced higher rates of infection and death than the White population. Although there has been an unprecedented explosion of clinical trials to examine potential therapies, participation by members of these vulnerable communities is crucial to obtaining data generalizable to those communities.
Methods
We undertook an open-label, factorial randomized clinical trial examining hydroxychloroquine and/or azithromycin for hospitalized patients.
Results
Of 53 screened patients, 11 (21%) were enrolled. Ten percent (3/31) of Black patients were enrolled, 33% (7/21) of White patients, and 50% (6/12) of Hispanic patients. Forty-seven percent (25/53) of patients declined participation despite eligibility; 58%(18/31) of Black patients declined participation. Forty percent (21/53) of screened patients were from a nursing facility and 10% (2/21) were enrolled. Enrolled patients had fewer comorbidities than nonenrolled patients: median modified Charlson comorbidity score 2.0 (interquartile range 0-2.5), versus 4.0 (interquartile range 2-6) for nonenrolled patients (P = 0.006). The limitations of the study were the low participation rate and the multiple treatment trials concurrently recruiting at our institution.
Conclusions
The high rate of nonparticipation in our trial of nursing facility residents and Black people emphasizes the concern that clinical trials for therapeutics may not target key populations with high mortality rates.
Open Access
Deriving Real-World Insights From Real-World Data: Biostatistics to the Rescue.
(Annals of internal medicine, 2018-09) Pencina, Michael J; Rockhold, Frank W; D'Agostino, Ralph B
Open Access
Design and analytic considerations for using patient-reported health data in pragmatic clinical trials: report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.
(Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020-02-06) Rockhold, Frank W; Tenenbaum, Jessica D; Richesson, Rachel; Marsolo, Keith A; O'Brien, Emily C
Pragmatic clinical trials often entail the use of electronic health record (EHR) and claims data, but bias and quality issues associated with these data can limit their fitness for research purposes particularly for study end points. Patient-reported health (PRH) data can be used to confirm or supplement EHR and claims data in pragmatic trials, but these data can bring their own biases. Moreover, PRH data can complicate analyses if they are discordant with other sources. Using experience in the design and conduct of multi-site pragmatic trials, we itemize the strengths and limitations of PRH data and identify situational criteria for determining when PRH data are appropriate or ideal to fill gaps in the evidence collected from EHRs. To provide guidance for the scientific rationale and appropriate use of patient-reported data in pragmatic clinical trials, we describe approaches for ascertaining and classifying study end points and addressing issues of incomplete data, data alignment, and concordance. We conclude by identifying areas that require more research.
Open Access
Electronic health records, medical research, and the Tower of Babel.
(N Engl J Med, 2008-04-17) Kush, Rebecca D; Helton, Edward; Rockhold, Frank W; Hardison, C David
Open Access
Finding Means to Fulfill the Societal and Academic Imperative for Open Data Access and Sharing.
(JAMA cardiology, 2018-09) Peterson, Eric D; Rockhold, Frank W
Open Access
Impact of Procedural Bleeding in Peripheral Artery Disease: An Analysis From EUCLID Trial.
(Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2019-10-04) Kansal, Aman; Huang, Zhen; Rockhold, Frank W; Baumgartner, Iris; Berger, Jeffrey S; Blomster, Juuso I; Fowkes, F Gerry; Katona, Brian; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Norgren, Lars; Hiatt, William R; Patel, Manesh R; Jones, W Schuyler
BACKGROUND:The relationship between invasive vascular procedures and bleeding in patients with peripheral artery disease has not been well described in the literature. This post hoc analysis from the EUCLID trial (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Artery Disease) aimed to describe the incidence of major and minor postprocedural bleeding and characterize the timing and severity of bleeding events relative to the procedure. METHODS:EUCLID was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 13 885 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease that tested the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events. A total of 2661 patients underwent 3062 coronary revascularization, peripheral revascularization, and amputation during the study. The primary safety end point was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major or minor bleeding. All bleeding events were formally adjudicated by a clinical end point classification group. RESULTS:Major bleeding events most often occurred ≤7 days following the procedure. The incidence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major or minor bleeding ≤7 days following peripheral revascularization (3.3%; 95% CI, 2.5%-4.1%) was similar to rates after coronary revascularization (4.0%; 95% CI, 2.6%-5.4%) and lower extremity amputation (2.3%; 95% CI, 0.8%-3.8%). The severity of bleeding events (as graded by drop in hemoglobin, need for transfusion, bleeding in a critical location, and fatal bleeding) was also similar following peripheral, coronary revascularization, and lower extremity amputation. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major/minor bleeding following peripheral revascularization is comparable to rates after coronary revascularization and lower extremity amputation, and the majority of bleeding events occur within 7 days following the procedure. The severity of periprocedural bleeding is also similar after procedures, with the most frequently adjudicated reason being a drop in hemoglobin ≥2 g/dL. Future studies should be performed to enhance our understanding of bleeding risk related to revascularization and amputation procedures in peripheral artery disease patients.
Open Access
Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the EUCLID Trial.
(JAMA cardiology, 2019-01) Olivier, Christoph B; Mulder, Hillary; Hiatt, William R; Jones, W Schuyler; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Rockhold, Frank W; Berger, Jeffrey S; Baumgartner, Iris; Held, Peter; Katona, Brian G; Norgren, Lars; Blomster, Juuso; Patel, Manesh R; Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Importance:Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk for myocardial infarction (MI). Objective:To characterize the incidence and types of MI in a PAD population, identify factors associated with MI, and determine the association of MI with cardiovascular mortality and acute limb ischemia. Design, Setting, and Participants:The Study Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (EUCLID) was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at 811 sites in 28 countries that randomized 13 885 patients with symptomatic PAD to monotherapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Participants had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.80 or less or previous lower extremity revascularization. Median follow-up was 30 months. For these analyses, patients were evaluated for MI occurrence during follow-up irrespective of treatment. Data were analyzed from June 2017 to September 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures:An adjudication clinical events committee classified MI as type 1 (spontaneous), type 2 (secondary), type 3 (sudden cardiac death), type 4a (less than 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention), type 4b (definite stent thrombosis), or type 5 (less than 72 hours after coronary artery bypass graft). A multivariate regression model was developed by stepwise selection to identify factors associated with MI, and a time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association of MI with cardiovascular death and acute limb ischemia requiring hospitalization. Results:Of the 13 885 patients included in this analysis, 9997 (72.0%) were male, and the median (interquartile range) age was 66 (60-73) years. Myocardial infarction occurred in 683 patients (4.9%; 2.4 events per 100 patient-years) during a median follow-up of 30 months. Patients experiencing MI were older (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [62-75] vs 66 [60-72] years), more likely to have diabetes (349 of 683 [51.1%] vs 4996 of 13 202 [37.8%]) or a previous lower extremity revascularization (466 of 683 [68.2%] vs 7409 of 13 202 [56.1%]), and had a lower ABI (if included by ABI) compared with censored patients. Of the 683 patients with MI during follow-up, the most common MI type was type 1 (405 [59.3%]), followed by type 2 (236 [34.6%]), type 4a (14 [2.0%]), type 3 (12 [1.8%]), type 4b (11 [1.6%]), and type 5 (5 [0.7%]). Postrandomization MI was independently associated with cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.0; 95% CI, 7.3-11.2; P < .001) and acute limb ischemia requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0; P = .008). Conclusions and Relevance:Approximately 5% of patients with symptomatic PAD had an MI during a median follow-up of 30 months. Type 1 MI (spontaneous) was the most common MI type; however, one-third of MIs were type 2 MI (secondary). More research is needed to identify therapies to reduce the risk of MI in patients with PAD and to improve management of type 2 MI. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822.
Open Access
Major bleeding in patients with peripheral artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial.
(American heart journal, 2019-11-18) Ward, Rachael; Huang, Zhen; Rockhold, Frank W; Baumgartner, Iris; Berger, Jeffrey S; Blomster, Juuso I; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Katona, Brian G; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Norgren, Lars; Vemulapalli, Sreekanth; Povsic, Thomas J; Mehta, Rajendra; Hiatt, William R; Patel, Manesh R; Jones, W Schuyler
BACKGROUND:Rates and predictors of major bleeding in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) treated with antiplatelets have not been well studied. This post hoc analysis of EUCLID aimed to determine the incidence of major/minor bleeding, predictors of major bleeding, and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following major bleeding events. METHODS:EUCLID, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 13,885 patients with symptomatic PAD, compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel for the prevention of MACE. The primary safety end point was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. Baseline characteristics were used to develop a multivariable model to determine factors associated with TIMI major bleeding. The occurrence and timing of MACE relative to a first major bleeding event were determined. RESULTS:TIMI major bleeding occurred in 2.3% of participants overall (0.94 event/100 patient-years). There was no significant difference in major bleeding rates by treatment assignment. Factors associated with TIMI major bleeding included older age, geographic region, Rutherford class, and β-blocker use. Patients with TIMI major bleeding postrandomization had an increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 4.46; 95% CI 3.40-5.84; P < .0001) compared with those without major bleeding; the association was strongest within 30 days after a bleeding event. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with symptomatic PAD, 0.94 major bleeding event/100 patient-years was observed and associated with older age, residing in North America, disease severity, and β-blocker use. Patients who had a major bleeding event were significantly more likely to experience MACE, especially within the first 30 days, when compared with patients who did not have major bleeding.
Open Access
Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
(Nature communications, 2021-04-15) Axfors, Cathrine; Schmitt, Andreas M; Janiaud, Perrine; Van't Hooft, Janneke; Abd-Elsalam, Sherief; Abdo, Ehab F; Abella, Benjamin S; Akram, Javed; Amaravadi, Ravi K; Angus, Derek C; Arabi, Yaseen M; Azhar, Shehnoor; Baden, Lindsey R; Baker, Arthur W; Belkhir, Leila; Benfield, Thomas; Berrevoets, Marvin AH; Chen, Cheng-Pin; Chen, Tsung-Chia; Cheng, Shu-Hsing; Cheng, Chien-Yu; Chung, Wei-Sheng; Cohen, Yehuda Z; Cowan, Lisa N; Dalgard, Olav; de Almeida E Val, Fernando F; de Lacerda, Marcus VG; de Melo, Gisely C; Derde, Lennie; Dubee, Vincent; Elfakir, Anissa; Gordon, Anthony C; Hernandez-Cardenas, Carmen M; Hills, Thomas; Hoepelman, Andy IM; Huang, Yi-Wen; Igau, Bruno; Jin, Ronghua; Jurado-Camacho, Felipe; Khan, Khalid S; Kremsner, Peter G; Kreuels, Benno; Kuo, Cheng-Yu; Le, Thuy; Lin, Yi-Chun; Lin, Wu-Pu; Lin, Tse-Hung; Lyngbakken, Magnus Nakrem; McArthur, Colin; McVerry, Bryan J; Meza-Meneses, Patricia; Monteiro, Wuelton M; Morpeth, Susan C; Mourad, Ahmad; Mulligan, Mark J; Murthy, Srinivas; Naggie, Susanna; Narayanasamy, Shanti; Nichol, Alistair; Novack, Lewis A; O'Brien, Sean M; Okeke, Nwora Lance; Perez, Léna; Perez-Padilla, Rogelio; Perrin, Laurent; Remigio-Luna, Arantxa; Rivera-Martinez, Norma E; Rockhold, Frank W; Rodriguez-Llamazares, Sebastian; Rolfe, Robert; Rosa, Rossana; Røsjø, Helge; Sampaio, Vanderson S; Seto, Todd B; Shahzad, Muhammad; Soliman, Shaimaa; Stout, Jason E; Thirion-Romero, Ireri; Troxel, Andrea B; Tseng, Ting-Yu; Turner, Nicholas A; Ulrich, Robert J; Walsh, Stephen R; Webb, Steve A; Weehuizen, Jesper M; Velinova, Maria; Wong, Hon-Lai; Wrenn, Rebekah; Zampieri, Fernando G; Zhong, Wu; Moher, David; Goodman, Steven N; Ioannidis, John PA; Hemkens, Lars G
Substantial COVID-19 research investment has been allocated to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, which currently face recruitment challenges or early discontinuation. We aim to estimate the effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine on survival in COVID-19 from all currently available RCT evidence, published and unpublished. We present a rapid meta-analysis of ongoing, completed, or discontinued RCTs on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment for any COVID-19 patients (protocol: https://osf.io/QESV4/ ). We systematically identified unpublished RCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Cochrane COVID-registry up to June 11, 2020), and published RCTs (PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to October 16, 2020). All-cause mortality has been extracted (publications/preprints) or requested from investigators and combined in random-effects meta-analyses, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), separately for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Prespecified subgroup analyses include patient setting, diagnostic confirmation, control type, and publication status. Sixty-three trials were potentially eligible. We included 14 unpublished trials (1308 patients) and 14 publications/preprints (9011 patients). Results for hydroxychloroquine are dominated by RECOVERY and WHO SOLIDARITY, two highly pragmatic trials, which employed relatively high doses and included 4716 and 1853 patients, respectively (67% of the total sample size). The combined OR on all-cause mortality for hydroxychloroquine is 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.20; I² = 0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and for chloroquine 1.77 (95%CI: 0.15, 21.13, I² = 0%; 4 trials; 307 patients). We identified no subgroup effects. We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there is no benefit of chloroquine. Findings have unclear generalizability to outpatients, children, pregnant women, and people with comorbidities.
Open Access
Outcomes of Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia in the EUCLID Trial.
(European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2018-01) Norgren, Lars; Patel, Manesh R; Hiatt, William R; Wojdyla, Daniel M; Fowkes, F Gerry R; Baumgartner, Iris; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Berger, Jeffrey S; Jones, W Schuyler; Katona, Brian G; Held, Peter; Blomster, Juuso I; Rockhold, Frank W; Björck, Martin; EUCLID Steering Committee and Investigators
OBJECTIVES:Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) implies an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and the optimal antithrombotic treatment is not established. DESIGN, MATERIALS, METHODS:The EUCLID trial investigated the effect of monotherapy with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in 13,885 patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD); the primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischaemic stroke. Patients planned for revascularisation or amputation within 3 months, were excluded. This analysis focuses on the subgroup with CLI, defined by rest pain (58.8%), major (9.0%) or minor (32.2%) tissue loss. RESULTS:In EUCLID, 643 patients (4.6%) had CLI at baseline. Diabetes mellitus was more common in the CLI group, while coronary disease, carotid disease, and hypertension were more common in the non-CLI group. A majority of CLI patients (62.1%) had only lower extremity PAD. In patients enrolled on the ankle brachial index (ABI) criteria, ABI was 0.55 ± 0.21 (mean ± SD) for those with CLI versus 0.63 ± 0.15 for those without CLI. The primary efficacy endpoint significantly increased among patients with CLI compared with those without CLI with a rate of 8.85 versus 4.28/100 patient years (adjusted for baseline characteristics hazard ratio [HR] 1.43 [95% CI 1.16-1.76]; p = 0.0009). When acute limb ischaemia requiring hospitalisation was added to the model, significant differences remained (adjusted HR 1.38, [95% CI 1.13-1.69]; p = 0.0016). The 1 year mortality was 8.9%. A trend towards increased lower limb revascularisation among those with CLI was observed. Bleeding (TIMI major, fatal, intracranial) did not differ between those with and without CLI. CONCLUSIONS:Nearly 5% of patients enrolled in EUCLID had CLI at baseline. Milder forms of CLI dominated, a result of the trial design. Patients with CLI had a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity versus those without CLI. Further efforts are required to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in PAD, especially in patients with CLI. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01732822.
Open Access
P2Y12 Inhibitor Switching in Response to Routine Notification of CYP2C19 Clopidogrel Metabolizer Status Following Acute Coronary Syndromes.
(JAMA cardiology, 2019-07) Povsic, Thomas J; Ohman, E Magnus; Roe, Matthew T; White, Jennifer; Rockhold, Frank W; Montalescot, Gilles; Cornel, Jan H; Nicolau, Jose C; Steg, P Gabriel; James, Stefan; Bode, Christoph; Welsh, Robert C; Plotnikov, Alexei N; Mundl, Hardi; Gibson, C Michael
Importance:Physician behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's CYP2C19 clopidogrel metabolizer status is unknown. Objective:To investigate the association of mandatory reporting of CYP2C19 pharmacogenomic testing, provided to investigators with no direct recommendations on how to use these results, with changes in P2Y12 inhibitor use, particularly clopidogrel, in the Randomized Trial to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (GEMINI-ACS-1) clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants:The GEMINI-ACS-1 trial compared rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice daily, with aspirin, 100 mg daily, plus open-label clopidogrel or ticagrelor (provided), in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The trial included 371 clinical centers in 21 countries and 3037 patients with ACS. Data were analyzed between May 2017 and February 2019. Interventions:Investigators were required to prestipulate their planned response to CYP2C19 metabolizer status. In response to a regulatory mandate, results for all patients were reported to investigators approximately 1 week after randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures:Reasons for switching P2Y12 inhibitors and occurrence of bleeding and ischemic events were collected. Results:Of 3037 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.0] years; 2275 men [74.9%], and 2824 white race/ethnicity [93.0%]), investigators initially treated 1704 (56.1%) with ticagrelor and 1333 (43.9%) with clopidogrel. Investigators prestipulated that they would use CYP2C19 metabolizer status to change P2Y12 inhibitor in 48.5% of genotyped clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 642 of 1324) and 5.5% of genotyped ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 93 of 1692). P2Y12 inhibitor switching for any reason occurred in 197 patients and was more common in patients treated with ticagrelor (146 of 1704 [8.6%]) compared with clopidogrel (51 of 1333 [3.8%]). Of patients initially treated with ticagrelor, only 1 (0.1% overall; 0.7% of all who switched) was switched based on CYP2C19 status. Of patients initially treated with clopidogrel, 23 (1.7% overall,;45.1% of all who switched) were switched owing to metabolizer status. Of 48 patients (3.6%) with reduced metabolizer status treated initially with clopidogrel, 15 (31.3%) were switched based on metabolizer status, including 48.1% (13 of 27) in which switching was prestipulated. Conclusions and Relevance:Physicians were evenly split on how to respond to knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in clopidogrel-treated patients. Mandatory provision of this information rarely prompted P2Y12 inhibitor switching overall, including a minority of patients with reduced metabolizer status. These findings highlight the clinical equipoise among physicians regarding use of this information and the reluctance to use information from routine genotyping in the absence of definitive clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy of this approach. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02293395.

Browsing by Author "Rockhold, Frank W"

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions