Browsing by Author "Schwab, F"
Now showing 1 - 11 of 11
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access 166 Predictive Modeling of Length of Hospital Stay Following Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: Analysis of 653 Patients With an Accuracy of 75% Within 2 Days(Neurosurgery, 2016-08-01) Scheer, JK; Ailon, TT; Smith, JS; Hart, R; Burton, DC; Bess, S; Neuman, BJ; Passias, PG; Miller, E; Shaffrey, CI; Schwab, F; Lafage, V; Klineberg, E; Ames, CPINTRODUCTION: The length of stay (LOS) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is a critical time period allowing for recovery to levels safe enough to return home or to rehabilitation. Thus, the goal is to minimize it for conserving hospital resources and third-party payer pressure. Factors related to LOS have not been studied nor has a predictive model been created. The goal of this study was to construct a preadmission predictive model based on patients' baseline variables and modifiable surgical parameters.Item Open Access Area under the Curve: Analysis of Approach-Related Recovery Time in 165 Operative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients with a 2-Year Follow-Up(Global Spine Journal, 2015-05-01) Challier, V; Smith, J; Shaffrey, C; Kim, HJ; Arnold, P; Liu, S; Scheer, J; Chapman, J; Protopsaltis, T; Lafage, V; Schwab, F; Massicotte, E; Yoon, ST; Fehlings, M; Ames, CIntroduction Much debate about postoperative outcomes regarding surgical approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) exists in the literature with no clear evidence of superiority. We propose a novel method for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes by taking into account each patient's baseline at postoperative time points and analyzing the “area under the curve” (AUC), a proxy for suffering time. Patients and Methods Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter database of patients with CSM. A total of 165 patients met the following inclusion criteria: symptomatic CSM, age older than 18 years, and 2-year follow-up with modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) and neck disability index (NDI). The anterior approach group (AAG) ( n = 110) and posterior approach group (PAG) ( n = 55) were compared at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years for each HRQOL. This comparison was repeated with normalization, using the patient's baseline as the anchor, followed by an integration and comparison of AUC. Results and Conclusion: For the first time, AUC analysis was applied to evaluating patients with CSM. Nonnormalized HRQOLs demonstrated the AAG started higher and met better standards at all times points compared with the PAG. Normalized mJOA demonstrated the PAG actually did better at 2 years, whereas NDI suggested that the AAG did better, although this was not significant. AUC analysis further supported the superiority of the PAG, with statistical significance at 1 and 2 years' time points, suggesting that patients who undergo the posterior approach may suffer less in the first 2 years of their postoperative course.Item Open Access Assessment of impact of standing long-cassette radiographs on surgical planning for lumbar pathology: An international survey of spine surgeons(Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2015-11-01) Maggio, D; Ailon, TT; Smith, JS; Shaffrey, CI; Lafage, V; Schwab, F; Haid, RW; Protopsaltis, T; Klineberg, E; Scheer, JK; Bess, S; Arnold, PM; Chapman, J; Fehlings, MG; Ames, COBJECT: The associations among global spinal alignment, patient-reported disability, and surgical outcomes have increasingly gained attention. The assessment of global spinal alignment requires standing long-cassette anteroposterior and lateral radiographs; however, spine surgeons routinely rely only on short-segment imaging when evaluating seemingly isolated lumbar pathology. This may prohibit adequate surgical planning and may predispose surgeons to not recognize associated pathology in the thoracic spine and sagittal spinopelvic malalignment. The authors used a case-based survey questionnaire to evaluate if including long-cassette radiographs led to changes to respondents' operative plans as compared with their chosen plan when cases contained standard imaging of the involved lumbar spine only. METHODS: A case-based survey was distributed to AOSpine International members that consisted of 15 cases of lumbar spine pathology and lumbar imaging only. The same 15 cases were then shuffled and presented a second time with additional long-cassette radiographs. Each case required participants to select a single operative plan with 5 choices ranging from least to most extensive. The cases included 5 "control" cases with normal global spinal alignment and 10 "test" cases with significant sagittal and/or coronal malalignment. Mean scores were determined for each question with higher scores representing more invasive and/or extensive operative plans. RESULTS: Of 712 spine surgeons who started the survey, 316 (44%) completed the entire series, including 68% of surgeons with spine fellowship training and representation from more than 40 countries. For test cases, but not for control cases, there were significantly higher average surgical invasiveness scores for cases presented with long-cassette radiographs (4.2) as compared with those cases with lumbar imaging only (3.4; p = 0.002). The addition of long-cassette radiographs resulted in 82.1% of respondents recommending instrumentation up to the thoracic spine, a 23.2% increase as compared with the same cases presented with lumbar imaging only (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of maintaining a low threshold for performing standing long-cassette imaging when assessing seemingly isolated lumbar pathology. Such imaging is necessary for the assessment of spinopelvic and global spinal alignment, which can be important in operative planning. Deformity, particularly positive sagittal malalignment, may go undetected unless one maintains a high index of suspicion and obtains long-cassette radiographs. It is recommended that spine surgeons recognize the prevalence and importance of such deformity when contemplating operative intervention.Item Open Access Clinical Impact Correlation of a Delphi-Based Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Severity Scale and HRQOL(Global Spine Journal, 2015-05-01) Lau, D; Funao, H; Clark, A; Smith, J; Bess, S; Shaffrey, C; Schwab, F; Lafage, V; Deviren, V; Hart, R; Kebaish, K; Ames, CIntroduction Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are adverse outcomes following adult spinal surgery (ASD) surgery. There is a lack of consensus regarding which patients (pts) require revision surgery. The Hart ISSG PJK severity scale correlates with the need for revision surgery. This study evaluates the Hart International Spine Study Group (ISSG) PJK severity scale and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in pts with PJK. Patients and Methods All ASD pts with PJK and/or PJF who eventually underwent revision surgery were identified from two large academic medical centers. Pts were retrospectively assigned scores based on the Hart ISSG PJK severity scale: neurological status, focal pain, instrumentation problem, kyphosis severity/PLC integrity, UIV/UIV + 1 fracture, and level of UIV. Scores range from 0 to 15. Pre-PJK revision HRQOL measures included: Oswestry disability index (ODI), short-form 36 (SF-36), and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS30). Scores were subcategorized into 0 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 8, 9 to 11, and 12 to 15, and differences in HRQOL outcomes were determined with linear regression. Correlation was assessed with a Pearson correlation coefficient. Results A total of 54 cases were included, out of which 31.5% were male, and the mean age was 64.9 years. The Hart ISSG PJK severity scale scores ranged from 4 to 15, with the median being 8. PJK/PJF occurred in the upper thoracic spine in 24.1% of the cases. 54.8% had fractures and 77.8% had instrumentation issues. Overall, 55.6% had neurological deficits, with 16.7% having weakness and/or myelopathy. All pts had preoperative pain (median VAS 9/10). While statistical significance on linear regression was not seen, there were obvious trends that correlated with the Hart ISSG PJK severity scale. Higher Hart ISSG PJK severity scale scores were associated with higher ODI (p = 0.283, r = 0.350), lower SRS30 function (p = 0.821, r = −0.323), and lower SRS mental (p = 0.646, r = −0.592). Conclusion The Hart ISSG PJK severity scale has been shown to be predictive in the decision making of when patients require revision surgery. Based on the current study, it may also correlate with functional outcomes, specifically ODI and SRS30 components.Item Open Access Clinically Significant Thromboembolic Disease in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factors in 737 Patients(Global Spine Journal, 2018-05-01) Kim, HJ; Iyer, S; Diebo, BG; Kelly, MP; Sciubba, D; Schwab, F; Lafage, V; Mundis, GM; Shaffrey, CI; Smith, JS; Hart, R; Burton, D; Bess, S; Klineberg, EOStudy Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Describe the rate and risk factors for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs; defined as deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods: ASD patients with VTE were identified in a prospective, multicenter database. Complications, revision, and mortality rate were examined. Patient demographics, operative details, and radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared with a non-VTE group. Multivariate binary regression model was used to identify predictors of VTE. Results: A total of 737 patients were identified, 32 (4.3%) had VTE (DVT = 14; PE = 18). At baseline, VTE patients were less likely to be employed in jobs requiring physical labor (59.4% vs 79.7%, P <.01) and more likely to have osteoporosis (29% vs 15.1%, P =.037) and liver disease (6.5% vs 1.4%, P =.027). Patients with VTE had a larger preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 93 mm vs 55 mm, P <.01) and underwent larger SVA corrections. VTE was associated with a combined anterior/posterior approach (45% vs 25%, P =.028). VTE patients had a longer hospital stay (10 vs 7 days, P <.05) and higher mortality rate (6.3% vs 0.7%, P <.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated osteoporosis, lack of physical labor, and increased SVA correction were independent predictors of VTE (r2 =.11, area under the curve = 0.74, P <.05). Conclusions: The incidence of VTE in ASD is 4.3% with a DVT rate of 1.9% and PE rate of 2.4%. Osteoporosis, lack of physical labor, and increased SVA correction were independent predictors of VTE. Patients with VTE had a higher mortality rate compared with non-VTE patients.Item Open Access Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up(Global Spine Journal, 2015-05-01) Smith, J; Shaffrey, C; Lafage, V; Schwab, F; Protopsaltis, T; Klineberg, E; Gupta, M; Hostin, R; Ming-Fu, K; Soroceanu, A; Hart, R; Burton, D; Bess, S; Ames, CIntroduction Adults with spinal deformity typically present with pain and disability. Our objective was to compare outcomes for op and nonop treatment for ASD based on a prospective, multicenter patient population. Patients and Methods This is a multicenter, prospective analysis of consecutive patients with ASD electing for op or non-op care at enrollment. Inclusion criteria are age < 18 years and ASD. Propensity scores were used to match an op and nonop patients based on baseline (BL) ODI, SRS22, maximum thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI–LL), and leg pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score. Results A total of 689 patients met criteria, including 286 op and 403 non-op, with mean ages of 53 and 55 years, minimum 2-year follow-up rates of 86 and 55%, and mean follow-up of 24.7 and 24.8 months, respectively. At BL, compared with nonop, op patients had significantly worse HRQL based on ODI, SRS22, SF36, and leg and back pain NRS (p > 0.001) and had worse deformity based on pelvic tilt, PI–LL, and C7SVA (p > 0.002). Before reaching minimum 2-year follow-up, 38 non-op patients converted to op treatment and were analyzed in the op group. At minimum 2-year follow-up, all HRQL measures assessed significantly improved for op patients (p > 0.001), but none of these measures improved significantly for non-op patients (p < 0.11). Overall, 97 matched op–non-op pairs were identified based on propensity scores. At last follow-up, the 97 matched op patients had significant improvement in all HRQL measures assessed (p > 0.001), but the 97 matched non-op patients lacked significant improvement in any of the HRQL measures (p < 0.20). Paired op–non-op analysis demonstrated the op patients to have significantly better HRQL scores at follow-up for all measures assessed (p > 0.001), except SF36 MCS (p = 0.058). Overall minor and major complication rates for op patients were 53 and 40%, respectively. Conclusion Op treatment for ASD can provide significant improvement of HRQL measures at minimum 2-year follow-up. In contrast, non-op treatment appears to at best maintain presenting levels of pain and disability.Item Open Access Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Selection to S1 or Ilium Versus L4 or L5 in Adult Spinal Deformity: Factors for Consideration in 349 Patients With a Mean 46-Month Follow-Up(Global Spine Journal, 2023-05-01) Yao, YC; Kim, HJ; Bannwarth, M; Smith, J; Bess, S; Klineberg, E; Ames, CP; Shaffrey, CI; Burton, D; Gupta, M; Mundis, GM; Hostin, R; Schwab, F; Lafage, VStudy Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) following spinal fusion with the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L4/L5 versus S1/ilium. Methods: A multicenter ASD database was evaluated. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on LIV levels—groups L (fusion to L4/L5) and S (fusion to S1/ilium). Both groups were propensity matched by age and preoperative radiographic alignments. Patient demographics, operative details, radiographic parameters, revision rates, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores were compared. Results: Overall, 349 patients had complete data, with a mean follow-up of 46 months. Patients in group S (n = 311) were older and had larger sagittal and coronal plane deformities than those in group L (n = 38). After matching, 28 patients were allocated to each group with similar demographic, radiographic, and clinical parameters. Sagittal alignment restoration at postoperative week 6 was significantly better in group S than in group L, but it was similar in both groups at the 2-year follow-up. Fusion to S1/ilium involved a longer operating time, higher PJK rates, and greater PJK angles than that to L4/L5. There were no significant differences in the complication and revision rates between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in HRQOL scores. Conclusions: Fusion to S1/ilium had better sagittal alignment restoration at postoperative week 6 and involved higher PJK rates and greater PJK angles than that to L4/L5. The clinical outcomes and rates of revision surgery and complications were similar between the groups.Item Open Access Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): A Prospective, Multicenter Matched and Unmatched Cohort Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up(Global Spine Journal, 2015-05-01) Smith, J; Lafage, V; Shaffrey, C; Schwab, F; Hostin, R; Boachie-Adjei, O; Akbarnia, B; Klineberg, E; Gupta, M; Deviren, V; Hart, R; Burton, D; Bess, S; Ames, CIntroduction Adults with spinal deformity typically present with pain and disability. Aim Our objective was to compare outcomes for operative (op) and nonoperative (nonop) treatment for ASD based on a prospective, multicenter patient population. Material and Methods This is a multicenter, prospective analysis of consecutive ASD patients electing for op or nonop care at enrollment. Inclusion criteria: age > 18 year and ASD. Propensity scores were used to match op and nonop patients based on baseline (BL) ODI, SRS22, maximum thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and leg pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score. Results A total of 689 patients met with the criteria, including 286 op and 403 nonop, with mean ages of 53 and 55 years, minimum 2-year follow-up rates of 86 and 55%, and mean follow-up of 24.7 and 24.8 months, respectively. At BL, compared with nonop, op patients had significantly worse HRQL based on ODI, SRS22, SF36, and leg and back pain NRS (p < 0.001) and had worse deformity based on pelvic tilt, PI-LL, and C7SVA (p ≤ 0.002). Before reaching minimum 2-year follow-up 38 nonop patients converted to op treatment and were analyzed in the op group. At minimum 2-year follow-up all HRQL measures assessed significantly improved for op patients (p < 0.001), but none of these measures improved significantly for nonop patients (p ≥ 0.11). Total 97 matched op–nonop pairs were identified based on propensity scores. At last follow-up the 97 matched op patients had significant improvement in all HRQL measures assessed (p < 0.001), but the 97 matched nonop patients lacked significant improvement in any of the HRQL measures (p ≥ 0.20). Paired op–nonop analysis demonstrated the op patients to have significantly better HRQL scores at follow-up for all measures assessed (p < 0.001), except SF36 MCS (p = 0.058). Overall minor and major complication rates for op patients were 53 and 40%, respectively. Conclusion Op treatment for ASD can provide significant improvement of HRQL measures at minimum 2-year follow-up. In contrast, nonop treatment appears to at best maintain presenting levels of pain and disability.Item Open Access Preoperative Cervical Hyperlordosis and C2–T3 Angle are Correlated to Increased Risk of Post-Op Sagittal Spinal Pelvic Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients at 2-Year Follow-Up(Global Spine Journal, 2015-05-01) Passias, P; Yang, S; Soroceanu, A; Scheer, J; Schwab, F; Shaffrey, C; Kim, HJ; Protopsaltis, T; Mundis, G; Gupta, M; Klineberg, E; Lafage, V; Smith, J; Ames, CIntroduction Cervical deformity (CD) is prevalent among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). The effect of baseline cervical alignment and achieving optimal TL alignment in ASD surgery is unclear. This study assesses the relationship between preoperative cervical spinal parameters and global alignment following thoracolumbar ASD surgery at 2-year follow-up. Patients and Methods Using a multicenter prospective database of surgical patients with ASD, we included patients with 2-year follow-up and cervical X-rays. SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers (PT, GA, and PI–LL) were assessed at 2-year postoperative as either normal (0) or abnormal (“ + ” or “ + +”). Patients were classified in the aligned group (AG) or maligned group (MG) if all the three sagittal modifiers were normal or abnormal, respectively. Patients were assessed for CD based on the following criteria: C2–C7 SVA > 4 cm, C2–C7 SVA < 4 cm, cervical kyphosis (CL > 0), cervical lordosis (CL < 0), any deformity (C2C7 SVA > 4 cm or CL > 0), and both CD (C2C7 SVA > 4 cm and CL > 0). Univariate testing was performed using t test or chi-square test, looking at the following pre-op parameters: CD, C2–C7 SVA, C2–T3 SVA, CL, T1S, T1S–CL, C2–T3 angle, LL, TK, PT, C7–S1 SVA, and PI–LL. Results A total of 184 patients met initial inclusion criteria with 70 in the AG and 34 in MG. Pre-op, patients in the MG had a higher cervical lordosis (11.7 vs. 4.9, p = 0.03), higher C2–T3 angle (13.59 vs. 4.9 p = 0.01), and higher PT ( p < 0.0001), higher SVA ( p < 0.0001), and higher PI–LL ( p < 0.0001) compared with the AG. Interestingly, the prevalence of CD at baseline was similar for both the groups: MG and AG. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of improvement over 2 years on the ODI or the SF-36 PCS. Conclusion Patients with 2-year sagittal TL malalignment also have preoperative sagittal TL malalignment and concomitant cervical hyperlordosis as a compensatory mechanism to maintain horizontal gaze. Cervical radiographs suggestive of cervical hyperlordosis should be followed up with complete standing radiographs to asses for sagittal TL malalignment.Item Open Access Radiographic outcomes of adult spinal deformity correction: A critical analysis of variability and failures across deformity patterns(Spine Deformity, 2014-01-01) Moal, B; Schwab, F; Ames, CP; Smith, JS; Ryan, D; Mummaneni, PV; Mundis, GM; Terran, JS; Klineberg, E; Hart, RA; Boachie-Adjei, O; Shaffrey, CI; Skalli, W; Lafage, VStudy Design Multicenter, prospective, consecutive, surgical case series from the International Spine Study Group. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment in restoring spinopelvic (SP) alignment. Summary of Background Data Pain and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity have been correlated with global coronal alignment (GCA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and pelvic tilt (PT). One of the main goals of surgery for adult spinal deformity is to correct these parameters to restore harmonious SP alignment. Methods Inclusion criteria were operative patients (age greater than 18 years) with baseline (BL) and 1-year full-length X-rays. Thoracic and thoracolumbar Cobb angle and previous mentioned parameters were calculated. Each parameter at BL and 1 year was categorized as either pathological or normal. Pathologic limits were: Cobb greater than 30°, GCA greater than 40 mm, SVA greater than 40 mm, PI-LL greater than 10°, and PT greater than 20°. According to thresholds, corrected or worsened alignment groups of patients were identified and overall radiographic effectiveness of procedure was evaluated by combining the results from the coronal and sagittal planes. Results A total of 161 patients (age, 55 ± 15 years) were included. At BL, 80% of patients had a Cobb angle greater than 30°, 25% had a GCA greater than 40 mm, and 42% to 58% had a pathological sagittal parameter of PI-LL, SVA, and/or PT. Sagittal deformity was corrected in about 50% of cases for patients with pathological SVA or PI-LL, whereas PT was most commonly worsened (24%) and least often corrected (24%). Only 23% of patients experienced complete radiographic correction of the deformity. Conclusions The frequency of inadequate SP correction was high. Pelvic tilt was the parameter least likely to be well corrected. The high rate of SP alignment failure emphasizes the need for better preoperative planning and intraoperative imaging. © 2014 Scoliosis Research Society.Item Open Access The Clinical Impact of Global Coronal Malalignment Is Underestimated in Adult Patients With Thoracolumbar Scoliosis(Spine Deformity, 2019-01-01) Plais, N; Bao, H; Lafage, R; Gupta, M; Smith, JS; Shaffrey, C; Mundis, G; Burton, D; Ames, C; Klineberg, E; Bess, S; Schwab, F; Lafage, VStudy Design: Retrospective review of multicenter adult spine deformity (ASD) database. Objectives: A recent publication demonstrated that the laterality of the coronal offset is a key parameter that directly impacts postoperative outcomes. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between global coronal malalignment (GCM) and functional outcomes in a North American population of ASD patients with no history of previous surgery. Summary of Background Data: The clinical impact of GCM in patients with ASD remains controversial. Methods: Primary patients were drawn from a multicenter database of ASD patients and categorized with the Qiu classification: Type A = GCM <3 cm; Type B = GCM >3 cm toward the concave side of the curve; and Type C = GCM >3 cm toward the convex side. In addition to the classic radiographic parameter, the coronal truncal inclination was investigated in regard to the pelvic obliquity. Clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and demographics were compared across the three Qiu Types using analysis of variance. The analysis was repeated after propensity matching of the three types by age and sagittal alignment (PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis). Results: 576 ASD patients (mean age 58.8 years) were included. Type B patients had significantly worse functional scores (Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form Survey physical component summary, and Scoliosis Research Society–22) and a more severe coronal deformity in terms of maximum Cobb angle, global coronal deformity angle, and coronal malalignment; they were also older (65.4 vs. 58.8 years, p = .004) and displayed more severe sagittal malalignment. Similar findings were observed after propensity matching. Conclusions: This study is the first to establish an association between functional outcomes and the severity of the coronal plane deformity in the setting of a specific coronal curve pattern in patients without previous surgery. Coronal malalignment significantly affects the health status of patients when the offset is greater than 3 cm in the direction of curve concavity. Level of Evidence: Level III.