Browsing by Author "Tamirisa, Nina"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical and pathological stage discordance among 433,514 breast cancer patients.
    (American journal of surgery, 2019-10) Plichta, Jennifer K; Thomas, Samantha M; Sergesketter, Amanda R; Greenup, Rachel A; Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M; Rosenberger, Laura H; Tamirisa, Nina; Hyslop, Terry; Hwang, E Shelley
    BACKGROUND:We aim to determine clinical and pathological stage discordance rates and to evaluate factors associated with discordance. METHODS:Adults with clinical stages I-III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Concordance was defined as cTN = pTN (discordance: cTN≠pTN). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with discordance. RESULTS:Comparing clinical and pathological stage, 23.1% were downstaged and 8.7% were upstaged. After adjustment, factors associated with downstaging (vs concordance) included grade 3 (OR 10.56, vs grade 1) and HER2-negative (OR 3.79). Factors associated with upstaging (vs concordance) were grade 3 (OR 10.56, vs grade 1), HER2-negative (OR 1.25), and lobular histology (OR 2.47, vs ductal). ER-negative status was associated with stage concordance (vs downstaged or upstaged, OR 0.52 and 0.87). CONCLUSIONS:Among breast cancer patients, nearly one-third exhibit clinical-pathological stage discordance. This high likelihood of discordance is important to consider for counseling and treatment planning.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma.
    (Journal of surgical oncology, 2019-08) Tamirisa, Nina; Williamson, Hannah V; Thomas, Samantha M; Westbrook, Kelly E; Greenup, Rachel A; Plichta, Jennifer K; Rosenberger, Laura H; Hyslop, Terry; Hwang, Eun-Sil Shelley; Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:We sought to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival by comparing node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients who received neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant (ACT) chemotherapy. METHODS:cT1-4c, cN1-3 ILC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2013) who underwent surgery and chemotherapy were divided into NACT and ACT cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted overall survival (OS), respectively. RESULTS:Five thousand five hundred fifty-one (35.6%) of 15 573 ILC patients treated with chemotherapy received NACT. NACT patients had similar rates of pT3/4 disease (26.6% vs 26.2%), nodal involvement (median 3 vs 4), and number of lymph nodes examined (median 13 vs 14) but higher rates of mastectomy (81.8% vs 74.5%, P < 0.001) vs ACT patients. 3.4% of NACT patients experienced pathologic complete response (pCR). Unadjusted 10-year OS was worse for NACT vs ACT patients (65.1% vs 54.4%, log-rank P < 0.001). After adjustment for known covariates, NACT continued to be associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.52). CONCLUSIONS:In node-positive ILC, NACT yielded low rates of pCR, was not associated with lower rates of mastectomy or less extensive axillary surgery, and was associated with worse survival vs ACT, suggesting limited benefit for these patients.