Browsing by Author "Thacker, Julie K"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Open Access
A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients
(Anesthesia and Analgesia, 2014-01-01) Waldron, Nathan H; Miller, Timothy E; Thacker, Julie K; Manchester, Amy K; White, William D; Nardiello, John; Elgasim, Magdi A; Moon, Richard E; Gan, Tong J
Copyright © 2014 International Anesthesia Research Society.BACKGROUND: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is associated with improved outcomes after surgery. The esophageal Doppler monitor (EDM) is widely used, but has several limitations. The NICOM, a completely noninvasive cardiac output monitor (Cheetah Medical), may be appropriate for guiding GDFT. No prospective studies have compared the NICOM and the EDM. We hypothesized that the NICOM is not significantly different from the EDM for monitoring during GDFT. METHODS: One hundred adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery participated in this study. Patients in phase I (n = 50) had intraoperative GDFT guided by the EDM while the NICOM was connected, and patients in phase II (n = 50) had intraoperative GDFT guided by the NICOM while the EDM was connected. Each patient's stroke volume was optimized using 250- mL colloid boluses. Agreement between the monitors was assessed, and patient outcomes (postoperative pain, nausea, and return of bowel function), complications (renal, pulmonary, infectious, and wound complications), and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared. RESULTS: Using a 10% increase in stroke volume after fluid challenge, agreement between monitors was 60% at 5 minutes, 61% at 10 minutes, and 66% at 15 minutes, with no significant systematic disagreement (McNemar P > 0.05) at any time point. The EDM had significantly more missing data than the NICOM. No clinically significant differences were found in total LOS or other outcomes. The mean LOS was 6.56 ± 4.32 days in phase I and 6.07 ± 2.85 days in phase II, and 95% confidence limits for the difference were -0.96 to +1.95 days (P = 0.5016). CONCLUSIONS: The NICOM performs similarly to the EDM in guiding GDFT, with no clinically significant differences in outcomes, and offers increased ease of use as well as fewer missing data points. The NICOM may be a viable alternative monitor to guide GDFT.
Open Access
Distant Harrington rod migration 35 years after implantation.
(Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2013-10) Lark, Robert K; Caputo, Adam M; Brown, Christopher R; Michael, Keith W; Thacker, Julie K; Richardson, William J
Harrington rods have been successfully implanted in thousands of patients for the correction of scoliotic deformity since the 1950s. An exceedingly rare complication of Harrington rod placement is loosening with resultant migration. The authors present a 50-year-old woman who had a single Harrington rod placed when she was 15 years old. Thirty-five years later, she presented with acute sensory changes in her lower extremities. Imaging revealed rod failure and migration of the hardware distally, resulting in penetration of the wall of the rectum. Due to the unique anatomical position of the migrated hardware, sigmoidoscopy was used to directly visualize and remove the rod. The patient ultimately made a full recovery. Rod migration is an exceedingly rare complication that has been described only a few times since the introduction of Harrington rods over 60 years ago. The case herein is particularly unique given the extensive period of time that passed before migration (35 years) and the use of sigmoidoscopy for hardware removal.
Open Access
Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review.
(Perioper Med (Lond), 2017) Horres, Charles R; Adam, Mohamed A; Sun, Zhifei; Thacker, Julie K; Moon, Richard E; Miller, Timothy E; Grant, Stuart A
BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared with a traditional care control group (October 2004 October 2007) at a single institution. Multivariable regression models examined the association of ERP with postoperative creatinine changes and incidence of postoperative acute kidney dysfunction (based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease criteria). RESULTS: Included were 1054 patients: 590 patients underwent surgery with ERP and 464 patients without ERP. Patient demographics were not significantly different. Higher rates of neoplastic and inflammatory bowel disease surgical indications were found in the ERP group (81 vs. 74%, p = 0.045). Patients in the ERP group had more comorbidities (ASA ≥ 3) (62 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, postoperative creatinine increase was slightly higher in the ERP group compared with control (median 0.1 vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but levels of postoperative acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p = 0.998). After adjustment with multivariable regression, postoperative changes in creatinine were similar in ERP vs. control (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: ERP in colorectal surgery is not associated with a clinically significant increase in postoperative creatinine or incidence of postoperative kidney injury. Our results support the safety of ERPs in colorectal surgery and may promote expanding implementation of these protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, prospective data collection and retrospective chart review only.
Open Access
Impact of an enhanced recovery pathway on length of stay and complications in elective radical cystectomy: a before and after cohort study
(Perioperative Medicine, 2019-12) Dunkman, W Jonathan; Manning, Michael W; Whittle, John; Hunting, John; Rampersaud, Edward N; Inman, Brant A; Thacker, Julie K; Miller, Timothy E