Browsing by Author "Tretiakov, Peter S"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time?
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-07) Passias, Peter G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Renaud; Diebo, Bassel; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Daniels, Alan H; Klineberg, Eric O; Khabeish, Khaled M; Mundis, Gregory M; Turner, Jay D; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Lafage, Virginie; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I

    Objective

    The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery for high-risk patients is being optimized over time and if poor outcomes are being minimized.

    Methods

    Patients who underwent surgery for cervical deformity (CD) and were ≥ 18 years with baseline and 2-year data were stratified by year of surgery from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups based on when the surgery was performed. Patients in the early cohort underwent surgery between 2013 and 2015 and those in the recent cohort underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. High-risk patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) baseline C2-7 Cobb angle > 15°, mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis ≥ 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°; 2) age ≥ 70 years; 3) severe baseline frailty (Miller index); 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1 SD above the mean; 5) three-column osteotomy as treatment; and 6) fusion > 10 levels or > 7 levels for elderly patients. The mean comparison analysis assessed differences between groups. Stepwise multivariable linear regression described associations between increasing year of surgery and complications.

    Results

    Eighty-two CD patients met high-risk criteria (mean age 62.11 ± 10.87 years, 63.7% female, mean BMI 29.70 ± 8.16 kg/m2, and mean CCI 1.07 ± 1.45). The proportion of high-risk patients increased with time, with 41.8% of patients in the early cohort classified as high risk compared with 47.6% of patients in the recent cohort (p > 0.05). Recent high-risk patients were more likely to be female (p = 0.008), have a lower BMI (p = 0.038), and have a higher baseline CCI (p = 0.013). Surgically, high-risk patients in the recent cohort were more likely to undergo low-grade osteotomy (p = 0.003). By postoperative complications, recent high-risk patients were less likely to experience any postoperative adverse events overall (p = 0.020) or complications such as dysphagia (p = 0.045) at 2 years. Regression analysis revealed increasing year of surgery to be correlated with decreasing minor complication rates (p = 0.030), as well as lowered rates of distal junctional kyphosis by 2 years (p = 0.048).

    Conclusions

    Over time, high-risk CD patients have an increase in frequency and comorbidity rates but have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that spine surgeons have improved over time in optimizing selection and reducing potential adverse events in high-risk patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Calibration of a comprehensive predictive model for the development of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in adult spinal deformity patients with consideration of contemporary goals and techniques.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-06) Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Diebo, Bassel G; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey; Protopsaltis, Themistocles; Hamilton, D Kojo; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory; Nunley, Pierce D; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled; Lewis, Stephen; Lenke, Lawrence; Hostin, Richard; Gupta, Munish C; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Kim, Han Jo; Lafage, Virginie; Passias, Peter G

    Objective

    The objective of this study was to calibrate an updated predictive model incorporating novel clinical, radiographic, and prophylactic measures to assess the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF).

    Methods

    Operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and baseline and 2-year postoperative data were included. PJK was defined as ≥ 10° in sagittal Cobb angle between the inferior uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) endplate and superior endplate of the UIV + 2 vertebrae. PJF was radiographically defined as a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle ≥ 15° with the presence of structural failure and/or mechanical instability, or PJK with reoperation. Backstep conditional binary supervised learning models assessed baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical information to predict the occurrence of PJK and PJF. Internal cross validation of the model was performed via a 70%/30% cohort split. Conditional inference tree analysis determined thresholds at an alpha level of 0.05.

    Results

    Seven hundred seventy-nine patients with ASD (mean 59.87 ± 14.24 years, 78% female, mean BMI 27.78 ± 6.02 kg/m2, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.74 ± 1.71) were included. PJK developed in 50.2% of patients, and 10.5% developed PJF by their last recorded visit. The six most significant demographic, radiographic, surgical, and postoperative predictors of PJK/PJF were baseline age ≥ 74 years, baseline sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) T1 pelvic angle modifier > 1, baseline SAAS pelvic tilt modifier > 0, levels fused > 10, nonuse of prophylaxis measures, and 6-week SAAS pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis modifier > 1 (all p < 0.015). Overall, the model was deemed significant (p < 0.001), and internally validated receiver operating characteristic analysis returned an area under the curve of 0.923, indicating robust model fit.

    Conclusions

    PJK and PJF remain critical concerns in ASD surgery, and efforts to reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF have resulted in the development of novel prophylactic techniques and enhanced clinical and radiographic selection criteria. This study demonstrates a validated model incorporating such techniques that may allow for the prediction of clinically significant PJK and PJF, and thus assist in optimizing patient selection, enhancing intraoperative decision making, and reducing postoperative complications in ASD surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Anterior/Posterior Staged vs. Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    (Spine, 2023-07) Passias, Peter G; Ahmad, Waleed; Tretiakov, Peter S; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Line, Breton; Daniels, Alan; Mir, Jamshaid M; Gupta, Munish; Mundis, Gregory; Eastlack, Robert; Nunley, Pierce; Hamilton, D Kojo; Hostin, Richard; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Ames, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Bess, Shay; Klineberg, Eric O; International Spine Study Group

    Studydesign

    Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multi-center adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.

    Objective

    To compare staged procedures to same-day interventions and identify the optimal time interval between staged surgeries for treatment of ASD.

    Background

    Surgical intervention for ASD is invasive and complex procedure that surgeons often elect to perform on different days (staging). Yet, there remains a paucity of literature on the timing and effects of the interval between stages.

    Methods

    ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data undergoing an anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion to the ilium were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for number of levels fused, number of interbody devices, surgical approaches, number of osteotomies/three-column osteotomy (3CO), frailty, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), revisions, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and UIV to create balanced cohorts of Same-Day and Staged surgical patients. Staged patients were stratified by intervening time-period between surgeries, using quartiles.

    Results

    176 PSM patients were included. Median interval between A/P staged procedures was 3 days. Staged patients had greater operative time and lower ICU stays postop (P<0.05). At 2Y, staged compared to same day showed a greater improvement in T1 slope - cervical lordosis (TS-CL), C2 sacral slope (C2SS), and SRS-Schwab SVA (P<0.05). Staged patients had higher rates of minimal clinically-important difference (MCID) for 1Y SRS-Appearance and 2Y physical component summary (PCS) scores. Assessing different intervals of staging, patients at the 75th percentile interval showed greater improvement in 1Y SRS Pain and Total postop as well as SRS Activity, Pain, Satisfaction, and Total scores (P<0.05) compared to patients in lower quartiles. Compared to the 25th percentile, patients reaching the 50th percentile interval were associated with increased odds of improvement in Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score proportionality (9.3[1.6-53.2], P=0.01).

    Conclusions

    This investigation is among the first to compare multicenter staged and same day surgery anterior/posterior adult spinal deformity patients fused to ilium using propensity-matching. Staged procedures resulted in significant improvement radiographically, reduced ICU admissions, and superior patient reported outcomes compared to same day procedures. An interval of at least three days between staged procedures is associated with superior outcomes in terms of GAP score proportionality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Incremental benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery for increasingly frail patients with adult spinal deformity.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-04) Passias, Peter G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Nunley, Pierce D; Wang, Michael Y; Park, Paul; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory M; Chou, Dean; Agarwal, Nitin; Fessler, Richard G; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Than, Khoi D; Brusko, Gregory; Fu, Kai-Ming; Turner, Jay D; Le, Vivian P; Line, Breton G; Ames, Christopher P; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Mummaneni, Praveen V

    Objective

    Circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) may provide incremental benefits compared with open surgery for patients with increasing frailty status by decreasing peri- and postoperative complications.

    Methods

    Operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) ≥ 18 years old with baseline and 2-year postoperative data were assessed. With propensity score matching, patients who underwent cMIS (cMIS group) were matched with similar patients who underwent open surgery (open group) based on baseline BMI, C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and S1 pelvic tilt. The Passias modified ASD frailty index (mASD-FI) was used to determine patient frailty stratification as not frail, frail, or severely frail. Baseline and postoperative factors were assessed using two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and multivariate ANCOVA while controlling for baseline age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and number of levels fused.

    Results

    After propensity score matching, 170 ASD patients (mean age 62.71 ± 13.64 years, 75.0% female, mean BMI 29.25 ± 6.60 kg/m2) were included, split evenly between the cMIS and open groups. Surgically, patients in the open group had higher numbers of posterior levels fused (p = 0.021) and were more likely to undergo three-column osteotomies (p > 0.05). Perioperatively, cMIS patients had lower intraoperative blood loss and decreased use of cell saver across frailty groups (with adjustment for baseline age, CCI score, and levels fused), as well as fewer perioperative complications (p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis also revealed that compared to open patients, increasingly frail patients in the cMIS group were also more likely to demonstrate greater improvement in 1- and 2-year postoperative scores for the Oswestry Disability Index, SRS-36 (total), EQ-5D and SF-36 (all p < 0.05). With regard to postoperative complications, increasingly frail patients in the cMIS group were also noted to experience significantly fewer complications overall (p = 0.036) and fewer major intraoperative complications (p = 0.039). The cMIS patients were also less likely to need a reoperation than their open group counterparts (p = 0.043).

    Conclusions

    Surgery performed with a cMIS technique may offer acceptable outcomes, with diminishment of perioperative complications and mitigation of catastrophic outcomes, in increasingly frail patients who may not be candidates for surgery using traditional open techniques. However, further studies should be performed to investigate the long-term impact of less optimal alignment in this population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.
    (Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-01) Dave, Pooja; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Mir, Jamshaid; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Buell, Thomas; Than, Khoi D; Fu, Kai-Ming; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Mundis, Gregory; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Nunley, Pierce; Chou, Dean; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas C; Passias, Peter G
    The objective was to determine the degree of regional decompensation to pelvic tilt (PT) normalization after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Operative ASD patients with 1 year of PT measurements were included. Patients with normalized PT at baseline were excluded. Predicted PT was compared to actual PT, tested for change from baseline, and then compared against age-adjusted, Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores. Lower-extremity (LE) parameters included the cranial-hip-sacrum angle, cranial-knee-sacrum angle, and cranial-ankle-sacrum angle. LE compensation was set as the 1-year upper tertile compared with intraoperative baseline. Univariate analyses were used to compare normalized and nonnormalized data against alignment outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model consisting of significant predictors for normalization related to regional compensation. In total, 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean ± SD age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.9 ± 1.6). Patients with normalized PT were more likely to have overcorrected pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). GAP score at 6 weeks was greater for patients with nonnormalized PT (0.6 vs 1.3, p = 0.08). At baseline, 58.5% of patients had compensation in the thoracic and cervical regions. Postoperatively, compensation was maintained by 42% with no change after matching in age-adjusted or GAP score. The patients with nonnormalized PT had increased rates of thoracic and cervical compensation (p < 0.05). Compensation in thoracic kyphosis differed between patients with normalized PT at 6 weeks and those with normalized PT at 1 year (69% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Those who compensated had increased rates of implant complications by 1 year (OR [95% CI] 2.08 [1.32-6.56], p < 0.05). Cervical compensation was maintained at 6 weeks and 1 year (56% vs 43%, p = 0.12), with no difference in implant complications (OR 1.31 [95% CI -2.34 to 1.03], p = 0.09). For the lower extremities at baseline, 61% were compensating. Matching age-adjusted alignment did not eliminate compensation at any joint (all p > 0.05). Patients with nonnormalized PT had higher rates of LE compensation across joints (all p < 0.01). Overall, patients with normalized PT at 1 year had the greatest odds of resolving LE compensation (OR 9.6, p < 0.001). Patients with normalized PT at 1 year had lower rates of implant failure (8.9% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), rod breakage (1.3% vs 13.8%, p < 0.05), and pseudarthrosis (0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.05) compared with patients with nonnormalized PT. The complication rate was significantly lower for patients with normalized PT at 1 year (56.7% vs 66.1%, p = 0.02), despite comparable health-related quality of life scores. Patients with PT normalization had greater rates of resolution in thoracic and LE compensation, leading to lower rates of complications by 1 year. Thus, consideration of both the lower extremities and thoracic regions in surgical planning is vital to preventing adverse outcomes and maintaining pelvic alignment.