Browsing by Author "Uribe, JS"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Current Status of Adult Spinal Deformity
    (Global Spine Journal, 2013-03) Youssef, JA; Orndorff, DO; Patty, CA; Scott, MA; Price, HL; Hamlin, LF; Williams, TL; Uribe, JS; Deviren, V
    PurposeTo review the current literature for the nonoperative and operative treatment for adult spinal deformity.Recent FindingsWith more than 11 million baby boomers joining the population of over 60 years of age in the United States, the incidence of lumbar deformity is greatly increasing. Recent literature suggests that a lack of evidence exists to support the effectiveness of nonoperative treatment for adult scoliosis. In regards to operative treatment, current literature reports a varying range of improved clinical outcomes, curve correction, and complication rates. The extension of fusion to S1 compared with L5 and lower thoracic levels compared with L1 remains a highly controversial topic among literature.SummaryMost adult deformity patients never seek nonoperative or operative treatment. Of the few that seek treatment, many can benefit from nonoperative treatment. However, in selected patients who have failed nonoperative treatment and who are candidates for surgical intervention, the literature reflects positive outcomes related to surgical intervention as compared with nonoperative treatment despite varying associated ranges in morbidity and mortality rates. If nonoperative therapy fails in addressing a patient's complaints, then an appropriate surgical procedure that relieves neural compression, corrects excessive sagittal or coronal imbalance, and results in a solidly fused, pain-free spine is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Defining modern iatrogenic flatback syndrome: examination of segmental lordosis in short lumbar fusion patients undergoing thoracolumbar deformity correction
    (European Spine Journal, 2024-01-01) Diebo, BG; Singh, M; Balmaceno-Criss, M; Daher, M; Lenke, LG; Ames, CP; Burton, DC; Lewis, SM; Klineberg, EO; Lafage, R; Eastlack, RK; Gupta, MC; Mundis, GM; Gum, JL; Hamilton, KD; Hostin, R; Passias, PG; Protopsaltis, TS; Kebaish, KM; Kim, HJ; Shaffrey, CI; Line, BG; Mummaneni, PV; Nunley, PD; Smith, JS; Turner, J; Schwab, FJ; Uribe, JS; Bess, S; Lafage, V; Daniels, AH
    Purpose: Understanding the mechanism and extent of preoperative deformity in revision procedures may provide data to prevent future failures in lumbar spinal fusion patients. Methods: ASD patients without prior spine surgery (PRIMARY) and with prior short (SHORT) and long (LONG) fusions were included. SHORT patients were stratified into modes of failure: implant, junctional, malalignment, and neurologic. Baseline demographics, spinopelvic alignment, offset from alignment targets, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared across PRIMARY and SHORT cohorts. Segmental lordosis analyses, assessing under-, match, or over-correction to segmental and global lordosis targets, were performed by SRS-Schwab coronal curve type and construct length. Results: Among 785 patients, 430 (55%) were PRIMARY and 355 (45%) were revisions. Revision procedures included 181 (23%) LONG and 174 (22%) SHORT corrections. SHORT modes of failure included 27% implant, 40% junctional, 73% malalignment, and/or 28% neurologic. SHORT patients were older, frailer, and had worse baseline deformity (PT, PI-LL, SVA) and PROMs (NRS, ODI, VR-12, SRS-22) compared to primary patients (p < 0.001). Segmental lordosis analysis identified 93%, 88%, and 62% undercorrected patients at LL, L1-L4, and L4-S1, respectively. SHORT patients more often underwent 3-column osteotomies (30% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and had higher ISSG Surgical Invasiveness Score (87.8 vs. 78.3, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Nearly half of adult spinal deformity surgeries were revision fusions. Revision short fusions were associated with sagittal malalignment, often due to undercorrection of segmental lordosis goals, and frequently required more invasive procedures. Further initiatives to optimize alignment in lumbar fusions are needed to avoid costly and invasive deformity corrections. Level of evidence: IV: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Evolving concepts in pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity surgery
    (Seminars in Spine Surgery, 2023-01-01) Turner, JD; Schupper, AJ; Mummaneni, PV; Uribe, JS; Eastlack, RK; Mundis, GM; Passias, PG; DiDomenico, JD; Harrison Farber, S; Soliman, MAR; Shaffrey, CI; Klineberg, EO; Daniels, AH; Buell, TJ; Burton, DC; Gum, JL; Lenke, LG; Bess, S; Mullin, JP
    Long-segment adult spinal deformity (ASD) constructs carry a high risk of mechanical complications. Pelvic fixation was introduced to improve distal construct mechanics and has since become the standard for long constructs spanning the lumbosacral junction. Pelvic fixation strategies have evolved substantially over the years. Numerous techniques now use a variety of entry points, screw trajectories, and construct configurations. We review the various strategies for pelvic fixation in ASD in a systematic review of the literature and update the techniques employed in the International Spine Study Group Complex Adult Deformity Surgery database.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    “Selection, planning and execution of minimally invasive surgery in adult spinal deformity correction”
    (Seminars in Spine Surgery, 2023-01-01) Alan, N; Uribe, JS; Turner, JD; Park, P; Anand, N; Eastlack, RK; Okonkwo, DO; Le, VP; Nunley, P; Mundis, GM; Passias, PG; Chou, D; Kanter, AS; Fu, KMG; Wang, MY; Fessler, RG; Shaffrey, CI; Bess, S; Mummaneni, PV
    Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for correction of adult spinal deformity was developed to address the high rate of medical and surgical complications rate in open surgical treatment of increasingly aging and frail patient population. In the past decade, MIS group within the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) has been in the forefront of the application of MIS techniques to fulfill the well-established principles of ASD surgery. These efforts have resulted in landmark studies. Here, we review these studies that encompass all aspects of MIS surgical treatment of ASD including patient selection with Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery (MISDEF) and MISDEF-2 algorithms, surgical planning with anterior column realignment classification and the Minimally Invasive Interbody Selection Algorithm (MIISA), and surgical execution with Spinal Deformity Complexity Checklist (SDCC). We will highlight that with careful selection, diligent planning and meticulous execution the MIS techniques can treat patients with ASD, abiding to correction principles and radiographic parameters.