Browsing by Author "Wildermann, NE"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Informing research priorities for immature sea turtles through expert elicitation
    (Endangered Species Research, 2018-01-01) Wildermann, NE; Gredzens, C; Avens, L; BarriosGarrido, HA; Bell, I; Blumenthal, J; Bolten, AB; McNeill, JB; Casale, P; Di Domenico, M; Domit, C; Epperly, SP; Godfrey, MH; Godley, BJ; González-Carman, V; Hamann, M; Hart, KM; Ishihara, T; Mansfield, KL; Metz, TL; Miller, JD; Pilcher, NJ; Read, MA; Sasso, C; Seminoff, JA; Seney, EE; Williard, AS; Tomás, J; Vélez-Rubio, GM; Ware, M; Williams, JL; Wyneken, J; Fuentes, MMPB
    © The authors 2018. Although sea turtles have received substantial focus worldwide, research on the immature life stages is still relatively limited. The latter is of particular importance, given that a large proportion of sea turtle populations comprises immature individuals. We set out to identify knowledge gaps and identify the main barriers hindering research in this field. We analyzed the perceptions of sea turtle experts through an online survey which gathered their opinions on the current state of affairs on immature sea turtle research, including species and regions in need of further study, priority research questions, and barriers that have interfered with the advancement of research. Our gap analysis indicates that studies on immature leatherback Dermochelys coriacea and hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata turtles are lacking, as are studies on all species based in the Indian, South Pacific, and South Atlantic Oceans. Experts also perceived that studies in population ecology, namely on survivorship and demography, and habitat use/behavior, are needed to advance the state of knowledge on immature sea turtles. Our survey findings indicate the need for more interdisciplinary research, collaborative efforts (e.g. data-sharing, joint field activities), and improved communication among researchers, funding bodies, stakeholders, and decision-makers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Network analysis of sea turtle movements and connectivity: A tool for conservation prioritization
    (Diversity and Distributions, 2022-04-01) Kot, CY; Åkesson, S; Alfaro-Shigueto, J; Amorocho Llanos, DF; Antonopoulou, M; Balazs, GH; Baverstock, WR; Blumenthal, JM; Broderick, AC; Bruno, I; Canbolat, AF; Casale, P; Cejudo, D; Coyne, MS; Curtice, C; DeLand, S; DiMatteo, A; Dodge, K; Dunn, DC; Esteban, N; Formia, A; Fuentes, MMPB; Fujioka, E; Garnier, J; Godfrey, MH; Godley, BJ; González Carman, V; Harrison, AL; Hart, CE; Hawkes, LA; Hays, GC; Hill, N; Hochscheid, S; Kaska, Y; Levy, Y; Ley-Quiñónez, CP; Lockhart, GG; López-Mendilaharsu, M; Luschi, P; Mangel, JC; Margaritoulis, D; Maxwell, SM; McClellan, CM; Metcalfe, K; Mingozzi, A; Moncada, FG; Nichols, WJ; Parker, DM; Patel, SH; Pilcher, NJ; Poulin, S; Read, AJ; Rees, AF; Robinson, DP; Robinson, NJ; Sandoval-Lugo, AG; Schofield, G; Seminoff, JA; Seney, EE; Snape, RTE; Sözbilen, D; Tomás, J; Varo-Cruz, N; Wallace, BP; Wildermann, NE; Witt, MJ; Zavala-Norzagaray, AA; Halpin, PN
    Aim: Understanding the spatial ecology of animal movements is a critical element in conserving long-lived, highly mobile marine species. Analyzing networks developed from movements of six sea turtle species reveals marine connectivity and can help prioritize conservation efforts. Location: Global. Methods: We collated telemetry data from 1235 individuals and reviewed the literature to determine our dataset's representativeness. We used the telemetry data to develop spatial networks at different scales to examine areas, connections, and their geographic arrangement. We used graph theory metrics to compare networks across regions and species and to identify the role of important areas and connections. Results: Relevant literature and citations for data used in this study had very little overlap. Network analysis showed that sampling effort influenced network structure, and the arrangement of areas and connections for most networks was complex. However, important areas and connections identified by graph theory metrics can be different than areas of high data density. For the global network, marine regions in the Mediterranean had high closeness, while links with high betweenness among marine regions in the South Atlantic were critical for maintaining connectivity. Comparisons among species-specific networks showed that functional connectivity was related to movement ecology, resulting in networks composed of different areas and links. Main conclusions: Network analysis identified the structure and functional connectivity of the sea turtles in our sample at multiple scales. These network characteristics could help guide the coordination of management strategies for wide-ranging animals throughout their geographic extent. Most networks had complex structures that can contribute to greater robustness but may be more difficult to manage changes when compared to simpler forms. Area-based conservation measures would benefit sea turtle populations when directed toward areas with high closeness dominating network function. Promoting seascape connectivity of links with high betweenness would decrease network vulnerability.