Browsing by Author "Yagi, Mitsuru"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A cost-effectiveness comparisons of adult spinal deformity surgery in the United States and Japan.(European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2018-03) Yagi, Mitsuru; Ames, Christopher P; Keefe, Malla; Hosogane, Naobumi; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Shay Bess, R; Matsumoto, Morio; Watanabe, Kota; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)Purpose
Information about the cost-effectiveness of surgical procedures for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is critical for providing appropriate treatments for these patients. The purposes of this study were to compare the direct cost and cost-effectiveness of surgery for ASD in the United States (US) and Japan (JP).Methods
Retrospective analysis of 76 US and 76 JP patients receiving surgery for ASD with ≥2-year follow-up was identified. Data analysis included preoperative and postoperative demographic, radiographic, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and direct cost for surgery. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was determined using cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The cost/QALY was calculated from the 2-year cost and HRQOL data.Results
JP exhibited worse baseline spinopelvic alignment than the US (pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis: 35.4° vs 22.7°, p < 0.01). The US had more three-column osteotomies (50 vs 16%), and shorter hospital stay (7.9 vs 22.7 days) (p < 0.05). The US demonstrated worse postoperative ODI (41.3 vs. 33.9%) and greater revision surgery rate (40 vs 10%) (p < 0.05). Due to the high initial cost and revision frequency, the US had greater total cost ($92,133 vs. $49,647) and cost/QALY ($511,840 vs. $225,668) at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05).Conclusion
Retrospective analysis comparing the direct costs and cost-effectiveness of ASD surgery in the US vs JP demonstrated that the total direct costs and cost/QALY were substantially higher in the US than JP. Variations in patient cohort, healthcare costs, revision frequencies, and HRQOL improvement influenced the cost/QALY differential between these countries.Item Open Access Comparable satisfaction and clinical outcomes after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the adult (AISA) between the US and Japan.(Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2023-01) Yagi, Mitsuru; Ames, Christopher P; Hosogane, Naobumi; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Bess, Shay; Matsumoto, Morio; Watanabe, Kota; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)Background
The impact of ethnicity on the surgery outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the adult (AISA) is poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the surgery outcomes for AISA between the United States (US) and Japan (JP).Methods
171 surgically treated AISA (20-40y) were consecutively collected from 2 separate multicenter databases. Patients were propensity-score matched for age, gender, curve type, levels fused, and 2y postop spinal alignment. Demographic and radiographic parameters were compared between the US and JP at baseline and 2y post-op.Results
A total of 108 patients were matched by propensity score (age; US vs. JP: 29 ± 6 vs. 29 ± 7y, females: 76 vs. 76%, curve type [Schwab-SRS TypeT; TypeD; TypeL; TypeN]: 35; 35; 30; 0 vs. 37; 33; 30; 0%)] levels fused: 10 ± 4 vs. 10 ± 4, 2y thoracic curve:17 ± 13 vs. 17 ± 12°, 2y CSVL: 10 ± 8 vs. 11 ± 9 mm). Similar clinical improvement was achieved between US and JP (function; 4.2 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.60, pain; 3.8 ± 0.9 vs 4.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.13, satisfaction; 4.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.2 ± 0.7, p = 0.61, total; 4.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 0.5, p = 0.60). The correlation analyzes indicated that postoperative SRS-22 subdomains correlated differently with satisfaction (all subdomains moderately correlated with satisfaction in the US while only pain and mental health correlated moderately with satisfaction in JP ([function: r = 0.61 vs 0.29, pain: r = . 72 vs 0.54, self-image: r = 0.72 vs 0.37, mental health: r = 0.64 vs 0.55]).Conclusions
Surgery for AISA was similarly effective in the US and JP. Satisfaction for spinal surgery among patients in different countries may not be different unless the procedure limits an individual's unique lifestyle that the patient expected to resume.Item Open Access Ethnic Variations in Radiographic Parameters and SRS-22 Scores in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparison Between North American and Japanese Patients Above 50 Years of Age With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.(Clinical spine surgery, 2018-06) Hosogane, Naobumi; Ames, Christopher; Matsumoto, Morio; Yagi, Mitsuru; Matsuyama, Yukihiro; Taneichi, Hiroshi; Yamato, Yu; Takeuchi, Daisaku; Schwab, Frank; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Bess, Shay; Lafage, Virginie; International Spine Study GroupStudy design
Retrospective review of North American and Japanese adult spinal deformity (ASD) database.Objective
To investigate the ethnical differences in radiographic parameters and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 between North American and Japanese ASD.Summary of background data
Previous comparison study between North American and Japanese ASD patients has revealed Japanese patients had marked pelvic tilt deformity and had lower Oswestry Disability Index scores corresponding to established thresholds of radiographic deformity. However, the subjects of the previous study included relatively younger ASD patients (above 18 y) of idiopathic origin.Materials and methods
Total 282 ASD patients older than 50 years, 211 patients from North America (United States) and 71 patients from Japan (JP), with minimum 2-year follow-up postoperatively were included in the study. Radiologic parameters were compared at the baseline and at 2-year follow-up. SRS-22 score was used for the comparison of clinical outcome.Results
At baseline, Japan showed significantly worse sagittal alignment such as smaller lumbar lordosis (LL), larger pelvic incidence (PI), and larger sagittal vertical axis than United States. However, Japan had significantly fewer levels fused than United States (US, 12.66±4.6; JP, 8.49±2.7). At 2 years after the surgery, Japan still had significantly worse residual sagittal deformity. Comparison of SRS-22 scores revealed Japan had better pain but worse functional domain scores at baseline which improved to comparable levels to the United States at 2 years. Self-image and mental health scores in Japan were significantly worse both at baseline and at 2 years. Analysis of factors affecting SRS-22 satisfaction score at 2 years revealed that previous spinal fusion surgery in the United States and LL, PI-LL, and sagittal vertical axis at 2 years in Japan had significant correlation.Conclusions
These similarities and discrepancies may be influenced by the cultural or lifestyle differences between both nations and should be considered when interpreting the results of ASD studies among different ethnicities.Item Open Access Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Cost-Effectiveness at 5 Years in Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery.(Spine, 2024-03) Passias, Peter G; Mir, Jamshaid M; Dave, Pooja; Smith, Justin S; Lafage, Renaud; Gum, Jeffrey; Line, Breton G; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Hamilton, David Kojo; Buell, Thomas J; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Mundis, Gregory M; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Chou, Dean; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen J; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Hart, Robert A; Lenke, Lawrence G; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Hostin, Richard A; Bess, Shay; Burton, Douglas C; International Spine Study GroupStudy design
Retrospective cohort.Objective
To evaluate factors associated with the long-term durability of cost-effectiveness (CE) in ASD patients.Background
A substantial increase in costs associated with the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has given precedence to scrutinize the value and utility it provides.Methods
We included 327 operative ASD patients with 5-year (5 Y) follow-up. Published methods were used to determine costs based on CMS.gov definitions and were based on the average DRG reimbursement rates. Utility was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D), with a 3% discount applied for its decline with life expectancy. The CE threshold of $150,000 was used for primary analysis.Results
Major and minor complication rates were 11% and 47% respectively, with 26% undergoing reoperation by 5 Y. The mean cost associated with surgery was $91,095±$47,003, with a utility gain of 0.091±0.086 at 1Y, QALY gained at 2 Y of 0.171±0.183, and at 5 Y of 0.42±0.43. The cost per QALY at 2 Y was $414,885, which decreased to $142,058 at 5 Y.With the threshold of $150,000 for CE, 19% met CE at 2 Y and 56% at 5 Y. In those in which revision was avoided, 87% met cumulative CE till life expectancy. Controlling analysis depicted higher baseline CCI and pelvic tilt (PT) to be the strongest predictors for not maintaining durable CE to 5 Y (CCI OR: 1.821 [1.159-2.862], P=0.009) (PT OR: 1.079 [1.007-1.155], P=0.030).Conclusions
Most patients achieved cost-effectiveness after four years postoperatively, with 56% meeting at five years postoperatively. When revision was avoided, 87% of patients met cumulative cost-effectiveness till life expectancy. Mechanical complications were predictive of failure to achieve cost-effectiveness at 2 Y, while comorbidity burden and medical complications were at 5 Y.Item Open Access Improvement and International Validation of the Predictive Probability of the Patient Demographics, Radiographic Index, and Surgical Invasiveness for Mechanical Failure (PRISM) Model for Preventive Procedures in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.(Spine, 2022-05) Yagi, Mitsuru; Hosogane, Naobumi; Ames, Christopher P; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Bess, Shay; Suzuki, Satoshi; Satoshi, Nori; Takahashi, Yohei; Tsuji, Osahiko; Nagoshi, Narihito; Nakamura, Masaya; Matsumoto, Morio; Watanabe, Kota; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)Study design
This is an international multicenter retrospective review of 219 surgically treated consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who had a minimum of five fused segments, completed a 2-year follow-up.Objective
The purpose of this study was to add the indices of preventive procedures to improve and to validate the predictive probability of the PRISM (patient demographics, radiographic index, and surgical invasiveness for mechanical failure) for mechanical failure (MF) following ASD surgery.Summary of background data
The PRISM was developed from the data of 321 ASD patients, which stratified the risk of MF from six types of risk.Methods
Data from 136 Japanese ASD patients (age 49 ± 21 yr, 88% female) were used to develop PRISM2, and data from 83 US ASD patients (age 58 ± 12 yr, 86% female) were used for the external validation. We analyzed the associations between three preventive procedures (UIV+1 tethering [TH], teriparatide [TP], and multirod [MR]) and MF by multivariate logistic regression analysis (MRA). The values for the nearest integer of the β of the procedures were added to the six indices of the original PRISM to establish the PRISM2. The discriminative ability of the PRISM/ PRISM2 for MF was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the precision-recall (PR) curve. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze the trend between PRISM/PRISM2 scores and MF.Results
MF developed in 25% (34 cases). The β values for the preventive procedures calculated by MRA were TH: -2.5, TP: -3.0, and MR: -2.1. The Cochran-Armitage test showed an excellent trend between MF and PRISM/2. The diagnostic ability was superior for the PRISM2 compared with the PRISM (PRISM2; AUC = 0.94 [0.90-0.98], PRISM; AUC = 0.87 [0.81-0.93], difference = -0.07 [-0.11 to -0.03], P < 0.01). The AUC of the PRISM2 was 0.70 [0.59-0.81, P < 0.01] in the US patient cohort.Conclusion
We refined the PRISM by adding preventive procedures to the risk indices. Further validation and adjustment in a large different patient cohorts may improve the predictive probability of PRISM2.Level of Evidence: 3.Item Open Access Introduction. Adult spinal deformity.(Neurosurgical focus, 2017-12) Shaffrey, Christopher I; Smith, Justin S; Ames, Christopher P; Yagi, Mitsuru; Alanay, Ahmet; Ha, YoonItem Open Access Lower Satisfaction after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Japan than in the US Despite Similar SRS22 Pain and Function Scores: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.(Spine, 2020-03-19) Yagi, Mitsuru; Ames, Christopher P; Hosogane, Naobumi; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Bess, Shay; Matsumoto, Morio; Watanabe, Kota; International Spine Study Group (ISSG)STUDY DESIGN:A multicenter retrospective case series OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of a surgical treatment for ASD in the United States (US) with those in Japan (JP) in a matched cohort. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Surgical outcomes of thoracic-lumbar-sacral (TLS) spinal fusions in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who live in Asian countries are poorly understood. METHODS:A total of 300 surgically treated ASDs of age > 50yr with the lowest instrumented vertebra at the pelvis and a minimum follow-up of 2y were consecutively included. Patients were propensity-score matched for age, gender, levels fused, and 2y postop sagittal spinal alignment. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic parameters were compared between the US and JP groups. RESULTS:A total of 186 patients were matched by propensity score and were almost identical within these parameters: age (US vs. JP: 66 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 7y), gender (females: 90 vs. 89%), levels fused (10 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 2), 2y C7SVA (5 ± 5 vs. 5 ± 4 cm), 2y PI-LL (9 ± 15° vs. 9 ± 15°), and 2y PT (25 ± 10° vs. 24 ± 10°). ODI scores and SRS-22 function and pain scores were similar at 2y between the US and JP groups (ODI: 27 ± 19 vs. 28 ± 14%, p = .72; SRS-22 function: 3.6 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, p = .54; SRS-22 pain: 3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, p = .11). However, significantly lower satisfaction was observed in JP than in the US (SRS-22 satisfaction: 4.3 ± 0.9 vs. 4.0 ± 0.8, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS:Surgical treatment for ASD was similarly effective in patients in the US and in JP. However, satisfaction scores were lower in JP compared to the US. Differences in lifestyle and cultural expectations may impact patient satisfaction following ASD surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.Item Open Access Predicting the Occurrence of Postoperative Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Cervical Deformity Patients.(Neurosurgery, 2020-01) Passias, Peter G; Horn, Samantha R; Oh, Cheongeun; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Yagi, Mitsuru; Bortz, Cole A; Segreto, Frank A; Alas, Haddy; Diebo, Bassel G; Sciubba, Daniel M; Kelly, Michael P; Daniels, Alan H; Klineberg, Eric O; Burton, Douglas C; Hart, Robert A; Schwab, Frank J; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Ames, Christopher PBACKGROUND:Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) development after cervical deformity (CD)-corrective surgery is a growing concern for surgeons and patients. Few studies have investigated risk factors that predict the occurrence of DJK. OBJECTIVE:To predict DJK development after CD surgery using predictive modeling. METHODS:CD criteria was at least one of the following: C2-C7 Coronal/Cobb > 10°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. DJK was defined as the development of an angle <-10° from the end of fusion construct to the second distal vertebra, and change in this angle by <-10° from baseline to postoperative. Baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical information were used to predict the occurrence of DJK using generalized linear modeling both as one overall model and as submodels using baseline demographic and clinical predictors or surgical predictors. RESULTS:One hundred seventeen CD patients were included. At any postoperative visit up to 1 yr, 23.1% of CD patients developed DJK. DJK was predicted with high accuracy using a combination of baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical factors by the following factors: preoperative neurological deficit, use of transition rod, C2-C7 lordosis (CL)<-12°, T1 slope minus CL > 31°, and cSVA > 54 mm. In the model using only baseline demographic/clinical predictors of DJK, presence of comorbidities, presence of baseline neurological deficit, and high preoperative C2-T3 angle were included in the final model (area under the curve = 87%). The final model using only surgical predictors for DJK included combined approach, posterior upper instrumented vertebrae below C4, use of transition rod, lack of anterior corpectomy, more than 3 posterior osteotomies, and performance of a 3-column osteotomy. CONCLUSION:Preoperative assessment and consideration should be given to these factors that are predictive of DJK to mitigate poor outcomes.Item Open Access Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-01) Dave, Pooja; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Mir, Jamshaid; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Buell, Thomas; Than, Khoi D; Fu, Kai-Ming; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Mundis, Gregory; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Nunley, Pierce; Chou, Dean; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Klineberg, Eric O; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Hostin, Richard A; Gupta, Munish C; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Hart, Robert A; Lenke, Lawrence G; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, Douglas C; Passias, Peter GThe objective was to determine the degree of regional decompensation to pelvic tilt (PT) normalization after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Operative ASD patients with 1 year of PT measurements were included. Patients with normalized PT at baseline were excluded. Predicted PT was compared to actual PT, tested for change from baseline, and then compared against age-adjusted, Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores. Lower-extremity (LE) parameters included the cranial-hip-sacrum angle, cranial-knee-sacrum angle, and cranial-ankle-sacrum angle. LE compensation was set as the 1-year upper tertile compared with intraoperative baseline. Univariate analyses were used to compare normalized and nonnormalized data against alignment outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model consisting of significant predictors for normalization related to regional compensation. In total, 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean ± SD age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.9 ± 1.6). Patients with normalized PT were more likely to have overcorrected pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). GAP score at 6 weeks was greater for patients with nonnormalized PT (0.6 vs 1.3, p = 0.08). At baseline, 58.5% of patients had compensation in the thoracic and cervical regions. Postoperatively, compensation was maintained by 42% with no change after matching in age-adjusted or GAP score. The patients with nonnormalized PT had increased rates of thoracic and cervical compensation (p < 0.05). Compensation in thoracic kyphosis differed between patients with normalized PT at 6 weeks and those with normalized PT at 1 year (69% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Those who compensated had increased rates of implant complications by 1 year (OR [95% CI] 2.08 [1.32-6.56], p < 0.05). Cervical compensation was maintained at 6 weeks and 1 year (56% vs 43%, p = 0.12), with no difference in implant complications (OR 1.31 [95% CI -2.34 to 1.03], p = 0.09). For the lower extremities at baseline, 61% were compensating. Matching age-adjusted alignment did not eliminate compensation at any joint (all p > 0.05). Patients with nonnormalized PT had higher rates of LE compensation across joints (all p < 0.01). Overall, patients with normalized PT at 1 year had the greatest odds of resolving LE compensation (OR 9.6, p < 0.001). Patients with normalized PT at 1 year had lower rates of implant failure (8.9% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), rod breakage (1.3% vs 13.8%, p < 0.05), and pseudarthrosis (0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.05) compared with patients with nonnormalized PT. The complication rate was significantly lower for patients with normalized PT at 1 year (56.7% vs 66.1%, p = 0.02), despite comparable health-related quality of life scores. Patients with PT normalization had greater rates of resolution in thoracic and LE compensation, leading to lower rates of complications by 1 year. Thus, consideration of both the lower extremities and thoracic regions in surgical planning is vital to preventing adverse outcomes and maintaining pelvic alignment.Item Open Access When is staging complex adult spinal deformity advantageous? Identifying subsets of patients who benefit from staged interventions.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024-11) Passias, Peter G; Tretiakov, Peter; Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O; Das, Ankita; Lafage, Renaud; Smith, Justin S; Line, Breton G; Nayak, Pratibha; Diebo, Bassel; Daniels, Alan H; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hamilton, D Kojo; Buell, Thomas J; Soroceanu, Alex; Scheer, Justin K; Eastlack, Robert K; Mullin, Jeffrey P; Schoenfeld, Andrew J; Mundis, Gregory M; Hosogane, Naobumi; Yagi, Mitsuru; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Chou, Dean; Fu, Kai-Ming; Than, Khoi D; Anand, Neel; Okonkwo, David O; Wang, Michael Y; Klineberg, Eric; Kebaish, Khaled M; Lewis, Stephen; Hostin, Richard; Gupta, Munish; Lenke, Lawrence; Kim, Han Jo; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Burton, DouglasObjective
The objective of this study was to identify baseline patient and surgical factors predictive of optimal outcomes in staged versus same-day combined-approach surgery.Methods
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with baseline and perioperative (by 6 weeks) data were stratified based on single-stage (same-day) or multistage (staged) surgery, excluding planned multiple hospitalizations. Means comparison analyses were used to assess baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical differences between cohorts. Backstep logistic regression and conditional inference tree analysis were used to identify variable thresholds associated with study-specific definitions of an optimal outcome in each cohort, defined as no intraoperative or surgery-related in-hospital adverse event.Results
There were 439 patients with complex ASD in the dataset (mean age 64.0 ± 9.3 years, 68% female, mean BMI 28.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2). Overall, 58.8% of patients were in the same-day group, while 41.2% were in the staged group. Demographically, cohorts were not significantly different (p > 0.05), but staged patients were more frail per total Edmonton Frail Scale score (p = 0.043). Staged patients also reported greater numeric rating scale scores for back pain than same-day patients (p = 0.002). Cohorts were comparable in magnitude of planned correction of C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, and T4-12 kyphosis (all p > 0.05). Controlling for baseline age, frailty, and number of levels fused, staged patients reported significantly higher PROMIS Discretionary Social Activities scores by 6 weeks (p = 0.029). Radiographic outcomes by 6 weeks were comparable between cohorts, in terms of both magnitude of change from baseline and overall result (all p > 0.05). Same-day patients were significantly more likely to experience in-hospital complications (p = 0.013). When considering frailty thresholds for staging, only a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 1.0 was associated with optimal outcome in same-day patients, while Edmonton Frail Scale score ≥ 7 (p = 0.036), ≥ 9 levels fused (p = 0.016), and baseline PI-LL mismatch ≥ 15.3° (p = 0.028) were associated with optimal outcome for staged patients. Yet, staging alone was not significantly associated with an optimal outcome perioperatively (p = 0.056).Conclusions
While staged and same-day combined-approach surgeries yield comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes, certain subsets of complex ASD patients may benefit from staged surgery despite the invariably increased hospital length of stay. Individuals with increased frailty, moderate to severe PI-LL mismatch, and increased anticipated number of levels fused may experience a lower risk of perioperative adverse events if they undergo a staged procedure. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT04194138 (ClinicalTrials.gov).