Browsing by Author "Yoon, Sangwook Tim"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients.
    (Spine, 2013-12) Fehlings, Michael G; Barry, Sean; Kopjar, Branko; Yoon, Sangwook Tim; Arnold, Paul; Massicotte, Eric M; Vaccaro, Alexander; Brodke, Darrel S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Woodard, Eric; Banco, Robert J; Chapman, Jens; Janssen, Michael; Bono, Christopher; Sasso, Rick; Dekutoski, Mark; Gokaslan, Ziya L

    Study design

    A prospective observational multicenter study.

    Objective

    To help solve the debate regarding whether the anterior or posterior surgical approach is optimal for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

    Summary of background data

    The optimal surgical approach to treat CSM remains debated with varying opinions favoring anterior versus posterior surgical approaches. We present an analysis of a prospective observational multicenter study examining outcomes of surgical treatment for CSM.

    Methods

    A total of 278 subjects from 12 sites in North America received anterior/posterior or combined surgery at the discretion of the surgeon. This study focused on subjects who had either anterior or posterior surgery (n = 264, follow-up rate, 87%). Outcome measures included the modified Japanese Orthopedic Assessment scale, the Nurick scale, the Neck Disability Index, and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey version 2 Physical and Mental Component Scores.

    Results

    One hundred and sixty-nine patients were treated anteriorly and 95 underwent posterior surgery. Anterior surgical cases were younger and had less severe myelopathy as assessed by mJOA and Nurick scores. There were no baseline differences in Neck Disability Index or SF-36 between the anterior and posterior cases. Improvement in the mJOA was significantly lower in the anterior group than posterior group (2.47 vs. 3.62, respectively, P < 0.01), although the groups started at different levels of baseline impairment. The extent of improvement in the Nurick Scale, Neck Disability Index, SF-36 version 2 Physical Component Score, and SF-36 version 2 Mental Component Score did not differ between the groups.

    Conclusion

    Patients with CSM show significant improvements in several health-related outcome measures with either anterior or posterior surgery. Importantly, patients treated with anterior techniques were younger, with less severe impairment and more focal pathology. We demonstrate for the first time that, when patient and disease factors are controlled for, anterior and posterior surgical techniques have equivalent efficacy in the treatment of CSM.

    Level of evidence

    3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study.
    (The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2013-09) Fehlings, Michael G; Wilson, Jefferson R; Kopjar, Branko; Yoon, Sangwook Tim; Arnold, Paul M; Massicotte, Eric M; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Brodke, Darrel S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Smith, Justin S; Woodard, Eric J; Banco, Robert J; Chapman, Jens R; Janssen, Michael E; Bono, Christopher M; Sasso, Rick C; Dekutoski, Mark B; Gokaslan, Ziya L

    Background

    Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical decompression on functional, quality-of-life, and disability outcomes at one year after surgery in a large cohort of patients with this condition.

    Methods

    Adult patients with symptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of spinal cord compression were enrolled at twelve North American centers from 2005 to 2007. At enrollment, the myelopathy was categorized as mild (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] score ≥ 15), moderate (mJOA = 12 to 14), or severe (mJOA < 12). Patients were followed prospectively for one year, at which point the outcomes of interest included the mJOA score, Nurick grade, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short Form-36 version 2 (SF-36v2). All outcomes at one year were compared with the preoperative values with use of univariate paired statistics. Outcomes were also compared among the severity classes with use of one-way analysis of variance. Finally, a multivariate analysis that adjusted for baseline differences among the severity groups was performed. Treatment-related complication data were collected and the overall complication rate was calculated.

    Results

    Eighty-five (30.6%) of the 278 enrolled patients had mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy, 110 (39.6%) had moderate disease, and 83 (29.9%) had severe disease preoperatively. One-year follow-up data were available for 222 (85.4%) of 260 patients. There was a significant improvement from baseline to one year postoperatively (p < 0.05) in the mJOA score, Nurick grade, NDI score, and all SF-36v2 health dimensions (including the mental and physical health composite scores) except general health. With the exception of the change in the mJOA, the degree of improvement did not depend on the severity of the preoperative symptoms. These results remained unchanged after adjusting for relevant confounders in the multivariate analysis. Fifty-two patients experienced complications (prevalence, 18.7%), with no significant differences among the severity groups.

    Conclusions

    Surgical decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy was associated with improvement in functional, disability-related, and quality-of-life outcomes at one year of follow-up for all disease severity categories. Furthermore, complication rates observed in the study were commensurate with those in previously reported cervical spondylotic myelopathy series.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    In response.
    (Spine, 2014-07) Fehlings, Michael G; Barry, Sean; Kopjar, Branko; Yoon, Sangwook Tim; Arnold, Paul; Massicotte, Eric M; Vaccaro, Alexander; Brodke, Darrel S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Smith, Justin S; Woodard, Eric; Banco, Robert J; Chapman, Jens; Janssen, Michael; Bono, Christopher; Sasso, Rick; Dekutoski, Mark; Gokaslan, Ziya L
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Mild diabetes is not a contraindication for surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America multicenter prospective study (CSM).
    (The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2014-01) Arnold, Paul M; Fehlings, Michael G; Kopjar, Branko; Yoon, Sangwook Tim; Massicotte, Eric M; Vaccaro, Alexander R; Brodke, Darrel S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Smith, Justin S; Woodard, Eric J; Banco, Robert J; Chapman, Jens R; Janssen, Michael E; Bono, Christopher M; Sasso, Rick C; Dekutoski, Mark B; Gokaslan, Ziya L

    Background context

    Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a chronic spinal cord disease and can lead to progressive or stepwise neurologic decline. Several factors may influence this process, including extent of spinal cord compression, duration of symptoms, and medical comorbidities. Diabetes is a systemic disease that can impact multiple organ systems, including the central and peripheral nervous systems. There has been little information regarding the effect of diabetes on patients with coexistent CSM.

    Purpose

    To provide empirical data regarding the effect of diabetes on treatment outcomes in patients who underwent surgical decompression for coexistent CSM.

    Study design/setting

    Large prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with and without diabetes who underwent decompressive surgery for CSM.

    Patient sample

    Two hundred thirty-six patients without and 42 patients with diabetes were enrolled. Of these, 37 were mild cases and five were moderate cases. Four required insulin. There were no severe cases associated with end-organ damage.

    Outcome measures

    Self-report measures include Neck Disability Index and version 2 of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2), and functional measures include modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score and Nurick grade.

    Methods

    We compared presurgery symptoms and treatment outcomes between patients with and without diabetes using univariate and multivariate models, adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.

    Results

    Diabetic patients were older, less likely to smoke, and more likely to be on social security disability insurance. Patients with diabetes presented with a worse Nurick grade, but there were no differences in mJOA and SF-36v2 at presentation. Overall, there was a significant improvement in all outcome parameters at 12 and 24 months. There was no difference in the level of improvement between the patients with and without diabetes, except in the SF-36v2 Physical Functioning, in which diabetic patients experienced significantly less improvement. There were no differences in surgical complication rates between diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients.

    Conclusions

    Except for a worse Nurick grade, diabetes does not seem to affect severity of symptoms at presentation for surgery. More importantly, with the exception of the SF-36v2 Physical Functioning scores, outcomes of surgical treatment are similar in patients with diabetes and without diabetes. Surgical decompression is effective and should be offered to patients with diabetes who have symptomatic CSM and are appropriate surgical candidates.