Browsing by Author "Zhang, Anru R"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Optimization of abdominal CT based on a model of total risk minimization by putting radiation risk in perspective with imaging benefit.
    (Communications medicine, 2024-12) Ria, Francesco; Zhang, Anru R; Lerebours, Reginald; Erkanli, Alaattin; Abadi, Ehsan; Marin, Daniele; Samei, Ehsan

    Background

    Risk-versus-benefit optimization required a quantitative comparison of the two. The latter, directly related to effective diagnosis, can be associated to clinical risk. While many strategies have been developed to ascertain radiation risk, there has been a paucity of studies assessing clinical risk, thus limiting the optimization reach to achieve a minimum total risk to patients undergoing imaging examinations. In this study, we developed a mathematical framework for an imaging procedure total risk index considering both radiation and clinical risks based on specific tasks and investigated diseases.

    Methods

    The proposed model characterized total risk as the sum of radiation and clinical risks defined as functions of radiation burden, disease prevalence, false-positive rate, expected life-expectancy loss for misdiagnosis, and radiologist interpretative performance (i.e., AUC). The proposed total risk model was applied to a population of one million cases simulating a liver cancer scenario.

    Results

    For all demographics, the clinical risk outweighs radiation risk by at least 400%. The optimization application indicates that optimizing typical abdominal CT exams should involve a radiation dose increase in over 90% of the cases, with the highest risk optimization potential in Asian population (24% total risk reduction; 306% CTDIvol increase) and lowest in Hispanic population (5% total risk reduction; 89% CTDIvol increase).

    Conclusions

    Framing risk-to-benefit assessment as a risk-versus-risk question, calculating both clinical and radiation risk using comparable units, allows a quantitative optimization of total risks in CT. The results highlight the dominance of clinical risk at typical CT examination dose levels, and that exaggerated dose reductions can even harm patients.