Browsing by Author "van Duin, David"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group 2.0: Back to Business.(Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021-08) Chambers, Henry F; Evans, Scott R; Patel, Robin; Cross, Heather R; Harris, Anthony D; Doi, Yohei; Boucher, Helen W; van Duin, David; Tsalik, Ephraim L; Holland, Thomas L; Pettigrew, Melinda M; Tamma, Pranita D; Hodges, Kathryn R; Souli, Maria; Fowler, Vance GIn December 2019, the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) was awarded funding for another 7-year cycle to support a clinical research network on antibacterial resistance. ARLG 2.0 has 3 overarching research priorities: infections caused by antibiotic-resistant (AR) gram-negative bacteria, infections caused by AR gram-positive bacteria, and diagnostic tests to optimize use of antibiotics. To support the next generation of AR researchers, the ARLG offers 3 mentoring opportunities: the ARLG Fellowship, Early Stage Investigator seed grants, and the Trialists in Training Program. The purpose of this article is to update the scientific community on the progress made in the original funding period and to encourage submission of clinical research that addresses 1 or more of the research priority areas of ARLG 2.0.Item Open Access Can ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam overcome β-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae?(Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017-02-06) Marshall, Steven; Hujer, Andrea M; Rojas, Laura J; Papp-Wallace, Krisztina M; Humphries, Romney M; Spellberg, Brad; Hujer, Kristine M; Marshall, Emma K; Rudin, Susan D; Perez, Federico; Wilson, Brigid M; Wasserman, Ronald B; Chikowski, Linda; Paterson, David L; Vila, Alejandro J; van Duin, David; Kreiswirth, Barry N; Chambers, Henry F; Fowler, Vance G; Jacobs, Michael R; Pulse, Mark E; Weiss, William J; Bonomo, Robert ABased upon knowledge of the hydrolytic profile of major β-lactamases found in Gram negative bacteria, we tested the effectiveness of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) with aztreonam (ATM) against carbapenem-resistant enteric bacteria possessing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Disk-diffusion and agar based antimicrobial susceptibility testing were initially performed to determine the in vitro efficacy of a unique combination of CAZ/AVI and ATM against 21 representative Enterobacteriaceae isolates with a complex molecular background that included blaIMP, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaCTX-M, blaAmpC, and combinations thereof. Time-kill assays were conducted, and the in vivo efficacy of this combination was assessed in a murine neutropenic thigh infection model. By disk diffusion assay, all 21 isolates were resistant to CAZ/AVI alone, and 19/21 were resistant to ATM. The in vitro activity of CAZ/AVI in combination with ATM against diverse Enterobacteriaceae possessing MBLs was demonstrated in 17/21 isolates, where the zone of inhibition was ≥ 21 mm. All isolates demonstrated a reduction in CAZ/AVI agar dilution MICs with the addition of ATM. At 2 h, time-kill assays demonstrated a ≥ 4 log10 CFU decrease for all groups that had CAZ/AVI plus ATM (8 μg/ml) added, compared to the CAZ/AVI alone group. In the murine neutropenic thigh infection model, an almost 4 log10 reduction in CFUs was noted at 24 h for CAZ/AVI (32 mg/kg q8h) plus ATM (32 mg/kg q8h) vs. CAZ/AVI (32 mg/kg q8h) alone. The data presented herein, requires us to carefully consider this new therapeutic combination to treat infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.Item Open Access Changing trends in mortality among solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic.(American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2022-01) Heldman, Madeleine R; Kates, Olivia S; Safa, Kassem; Kotton, Camille N; Georgia, Sarah J; Steinbrink, Julie M; Alexander, Barbara D; Hemmersbach-Miller, Marion; Blumberg, Emily A; Multani, Ashrit; Haydel, Brandy; La Hoz, Ricardo M; Moni, Lisset; Condor, Yesabeli; Flores, Sandra; Munoz, Carlos G; Guitierrez, Juan; Diaz, Esther I; Diaz, Daniela; Vianna, Rodrigo; Guerra, Giselle; Loebe, Matthias; Rakita, Robert M; Malinis, Maricar; Azar, Marwan M; Hemmige, Vagish; McCort, Margaret E; Chaudhry, Zohra S; Singh, Pooja P; Hughes Kramer, Kailey; Velioglu, Arzu; Yabu, Julie M; Morillis, Jose A; Mehta, Sapna A; Tanna, Sajal D; Ison, Michael G; Derenge, Ariella C; van Duin, David; Maximin, Adrienne; Gilbert, Carlene; Goldman, Jason D; Lease, Erika D; Fisher, Cynthia E; Limaye, Ajit P; UW COVID-19 SOT Study TeamMortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 has declined over the course of the pandemic. Mortality trends specifically in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are unknown. Using data from a multicenter registry of SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19, we compared 28-day mortality between early 2020 (March 1, 2020-June 19, 2020) and late 2020 (June 20, 2020-December 31, 2020). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality. Time period of diagnosis was available for 1435/1616 (88.8%) SOTR and 971/1435 (67.7%) were hospitalized: 571/753 (75.8%) in early 2020 and 402/682 (58.9%) in late 2020 (p < .001). Crude 28-day mortality decreased between the early and late periods (112/571 [19.6%] vs. 55/402 [13.7%]) and remained lower in the late period even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98, p = .016). Between the early and late periods, the use of corticosteroids (≥6 mg dexamethasone/day) and remdesivir increased (62/571 [10.9%] vs. 243/402 [61.5%], p < .001 and 50/571 [8.8%] vs. 213/402 [52.2%], p < .001, respectively), and the use of hydroxychloroquine and IL-6/IL-6 receptor inhibitor decreased (329/571 [60.0%] vs. 4/492 [1.0%], p < .001 and 73/571 [12.8%] vs. 5/402 [1.2%], p < .001, respectively). Mortality among SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19 declined between early and late 2020, consistent with trends reported in the general population. The mechanism(s) underlying improved survival require further study.Item Open Access Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study.(The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021-11-09) Wang, Minggui; Earley, Michelle; Chen, Liang; Hanson, Blake M; Yu, Yunsong; Liu, Zhengyin; Salcedo, Soraya; Cober, Eric; Li, Lanjuan; Kanj, Souha S; Gao, Hainv; Munita, Jose M; Ordoñez, Karen; Weston, Greg; Satlin, Michael J; Valderrama-Beltrán, Sandra L; Marimuthu, Kalisvar; Stryjewski, Martin E; Komarow, Lauren; Luterbach, Courtney; Marshall, Steve H; Rudin, Susan D; Manca, Claudia; Paterson, David L; Reyes, Jinnethe; Villegas, Maria V; Evans, Scott; Hill, Carol; Arias, Rebekka; Baum, Keri; Fries, Bettina C; Doi, Yohei; Patel, Robin; Kreiswirth, Barry N; Bonomo, Robert A; Chambers, Henry F; Fowler, Vance G; Arias, Cesar A; van Duin, David; Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Network InvestigatorsBackground
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a global threat. We therefore analysed the bacterial characteristics of CRKP infections and the clinical outcomes of patients with CRKP infections across different countries.Methods
In this prospective, multicentre, cohort study (CRACKLE-2), hospitalised patients with cultures positive for CRKP were recruited from 71 hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, Colombia, Lebanon, Singapore, and the USA. The first culture positive for CRKP was included for each unique patient. Clinical data on post-hospitalisation death and readmission were collected from health records, and whole genome sequencing was done on all isolates. The primary outcome was a desirability of outcome ranking at 30 days after the index culture, and, along with bacterial characteristics and 30-day all-cause mortality (a key secondary outcome), was compared between patients from China, South America, and the USA. The desirability of outcome ranking was adjusted for location before admission, Charlson comorbidity index, age at culture, Pitt bacteremia score, and anatomical culture source through inverse probability weighting; mortality was adjusted for the same confounders, plus region where relevant, through multivariable logistic regression. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03646227, and is complete.Findings
Between June 13, 2017, and Nov 30, 2018, 991 patients were enrolled, of whom 502 (51%) met the criteria for CRKP infection and 489 (49%) had positive cultures that were considered colonisation. We observed little intra-country genetic variation in CRKP. Infected patients from the USA were more acutely ill than were patients from China or South America (median Pitt bacteremia score 3 [IQR 2-6] vs 2 [0-4] vs 2 [0-4]) and had more comorbidities (median Charlson comorbidity index 3 [IQR 2-5] vs 1 [0-3] vs 1 [0-2]). Adjusted desirability of outcome ranking outcomes were similar in infected patients from China (n=246), South America (n=109), and the USA (n=130); the estimates were 53% (95% CI 42-65) for China versus South America, 50% (41-61) for the USA versus China, and 53% (41-66) for the USA versus South America. In patients with CRKP infections, unadjusted 30-day mortality was lower in China (12%, 95% CI 8-16; 29 of 246) than in the USA (23%, 16-30; 30 of 130) and South America (28%, 20-37; 31 of 109). Adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality was higher in South America than in China (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·82, 95% CI 2·22-10·50) and the USA (aOR 3·34, 1·50-7·47), with the mortality difference between the USA and China no longer being significant (aOR 1·44, 0·70-2·96).Interpretation
Global CRKP epidemics have important regional differences in patients' baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, and in bacterial characteristics. Research findings from one region might not be generalisable to other regions.Funding
The National Institutes of Health.Item Open Access Delayed mortality among solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19.(Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022-02) Heldman, Madeleine R; Kates, Olivia S; Safa, Kassem; Kotton, Camille N; Multani, Ashrit; Georgia, Sarah J; Steinbrink, Julie M; Alexander, Barbara D; Blumberg, Emily A; Haydel, Brandy; Hemmige, Vagish; Hemmersbach-Miller, Marion; La Hoz, Ricardo M; Moni, Lisset; Condor, Yesabeli; Flores, Sandra; Munoz, Carlos G; Guitierrez, Juan; Diaz, Esther I; Diaz, Daniela; Vianna, Rodrigo; Guerra, Giselle; Loebe, Matthias; Yabu, Julie M; Kramer, Kailey Hughes; Tanna, Sajal D; Ison, Michael G; Rakita, Robert M; Malinis, Maricar; Azar, Marwan M; McCort, Margaret E; Singh, Pooja P; Velioglu, Arzu; Mehta, Sapna A; van Duin, David; Goldman, Jason D; Lease, Erika D; Wald, Anna; Limaye, Ajit P; Fisher, Cynthia E; UW Covid-19 SOT Study TeamIntroduction
Most studies of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with COVID-19 focus on outcomes within one month of illness onset. Delayed mortality in SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 has not been fully examined.Methods
We used data from a multicenter registry to calculate mortality by 90 days following initial SARS-CoV-2 detection in SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 and developed multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to compare risk factors for death by days 28 and 90.Results
Vital status at day 90 was available for 936 of 1117 (84%) SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19: 190 of 936 (20%) died by 28 days and an additional 56 of 246 deaths (23%) occurred between days 29 and 90. Factors associated with mortality by day 90 included: age > 65 years [aHR 1.8 (1.3-2.4), p =<0.001], lung transplant (vs. non-lung transplant) [aHR 1.5 (1.0-2.3), p=0.05], heart failure [aHR 1.9 (1.2-2.9), p=0.006], chronic lung disease [aHR 2.3 (1.5-3.6), p<0.001] and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m 2 [aHR 1.5 (1.1-2.0), p=0.02]. These associations were similar for mortality by day 28. Compared to diagnosis during early 2020 (March 1-June 19, 2020), diagnosis during late 2020 (June 20-December 31, 2020) was associated with lower mortality by day 28 [aHR 0.7 (0.5-1.0, p=0.04] but not by day 90 [aHR 0.9 (0.7-1.3), p=0.61].Conclusions
In SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19, >20% of deaths occurred between 28 and 90 days following SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Future investigations should consider extending follow-up duration to 90 days for more complete mortality assessment.