National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Education and Certificate Program
Permanent URI for this collection
The following is a collection of approved, exceptional capstone papers submitted by students to the Duke Environmental Leadership Program. This collection should serve as a guide for formatting and how to compose your paper. The capstone paper is an original, research-based culminating exercise related to NEPA theory or practice. The paper should be based on what you have learned in the courses and your current or future work in the field; case study examples are encouraged. The rationale of the capstone paper is twofold: to demonstrate knowledge of the subject, and to make a contribution to the field. Exemplary papers may be incorporated into future course offerings and compiled for distribution, with authors' permission. Papers are reviewed by a panel of experts in NEPA. Topics must be approved in advance.
Browse
Browsing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Education and Certificate Program by Subject "National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)"
Now showing 1 - 14 of 14
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A Discussion of the Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) within the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Division of Hydropower Licensing and a Comparison of NEPA within Their Three Licensing Procedures(2009-02) Templeton, CarolynThe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate environmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental impacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. Under the authority of the Federal Power Act, as amended,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has the exclusive authority to license most nonfederal hydropower projects located on navigable waterways or federal lands, or connected to the interstate electric grid. Applicants for licenses may use the integrated, traditional, or alternative licensing process. This paper discusses the implementation of NEPA within the Commission’s Division of Hydropower Licensing (DHL) and analyzes the three aforementioned licensing processes. Issues such as purpose and need and establishing reasonable and viable alternatives will be discussed and areas such as tribal consultation, scoping, and preparation of the environmental document will be contrasted and compared.Item Restricted An Analysis of Land Use Planner Input in Indirect and Cumulative Effects Analysis(2011-04-13) Snyder, KerriThis paper provides a discussion of a common method used to gain local planner input into indirect and cumulative effects analyses, an example of the analysis of indirect and cumulative effects to land use based on local planner input, and an evaluation of potential pitfalls associated with gaining input from local planners and the evaluation of potential effects to resources required under NEPA.Item Open Access Are Changes Needed to NEPA?(2006-09) Cecchini, DanItem Open Access CERCLA Remediations and the NEPA Process--Are Environmental Cleanups Forgetting the Socioeconomic Issues?(2005-04-12) Masson, PeterItem Open Access Item Open Access Data and Adaptive Management: The Critical Role of Quality Data in the Successful Application of Adaptive Management on the Valles Caldera National Preserve(2011-03-15) Rodriguez, MarieSince 2002 the Valles Caldera Trust has invested in the acquisition of “quality” data or, data collected by experts or under the supervision of experts; using specific, repeatable, protocol; and maintained with integrity (established meta-data, limited access). As a result the, the Trust can realize benefits in efficiency, reduced costs over time, increased public confidence, and ultimately learning and improved decision making - all considered benefits and rewards of adaptive management.Item Open Access Green Highways Initiative: Streamlining the Environmental Ethic(2007-06-06) Moore, ChristopherItem Open Access How the NEPA Process Served as Valuable Planing Tool: A Case Study of the Folly Road/Camp Road Intersection Improvement Project in Charleston, SC(2011-04-13) Gallagher, StephanieThe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was established to make agencies think about the environmental effects that their proposed actions will have prior to making decisions. Requirements of NEPA are generally met through the production of an environmental document that analyzes the proposed action. However, NEPA is about more than just producing a document; it is about examining your choices and making a good decision. This case study will examine a voluntary environmental document (Categorical Exclusion Level C) for an intersection improvement (including new sidewalks and bike lanes) at one of the most congested areas in Charleston County, where no environmental impacts were anticipated from the proposed project.Item Restricted Indirect & Cumulative Effects of Transportation Projects on Land Use and Local Government(2011-04-13) Deaton, RobertItem Open Access NEPA's Relevance to An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century(2006-08-18) Keys, DavidItem Open Access The Importance of Adequately Addressing Alternatives: Identification and Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment(2009-11-02) Kendrick, MelissaThe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was signed into United States Law in 1969 for the purpose of establishing the requirement for adequate environmental analysis of projects occurring on Federal lands or via the utilization of Federal funds. Key to this process is the identification and analysis of viable and feasible alternatives to a proposed action, to include the “No Action Alternative,” often utilized as the baseline against which the potential effects of alternatives are compared (32 CFR 651.7). Screening criteria utilized to develop a proposed action and its alternatives must be presented in clear and concise terms, in order to ensure the public and regulatory community understands the alternative development process. The document must also clearly explain why some alternatives are carried forward for detailed review and analysis, while others are eliminated from further review. Recent litigation has highlighted the significance of the failure to either adequately identify alternatives to a proposed action or to pay due attention to the No Action Alternative. Investigation and discussion of the alternative development and analysis process, as illustrated in several recent court cases, will be the focus of this paper.Item Open Access USAID Regional Environmental Advisor(2008-06-07) Donald, Michael