Browsing by Subject "Advisory Committees"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.(Spine, 2010-10) Fisher, Charles G; DiPaola, Christian P; Ryken, Timothy C; Bilsky, Mark H; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Berven, Sigurd H; Harrop, James S; Fehlings, Michael G; Boriani, Stefano; Chou, Dean; Schmidt, Meic H; Polly, David W; Biagini, Roberto; Burch, Shane; Dekutoski, Mark B; Ganju, Aruna; Gerszten, Peter C; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Groff, Michael W; Liebsch, Norbert J; Mendel, Ehud; Okuno, Scott H; Patel, Shreyaskumar; Rhines, Laurence D; Rose, Peter S; Sciubba, Daniel M; Sundaresan, Narayan; Tomita, Katsuro; Varga, Peter P; Vialle, Luiz R; Vrionis, Frank D; Yamada, Yoshiya; Fourney, Daryl RStudy design
Systematic review and modified Delphi technique.Objective
To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability.Summary of background data
Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors.Methods
We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability.Results
A comprehensive classification system based on patient symptoms and radiographic criteria of the spine was developed to aid in predicting spine stability of neoplastic lesions. The classification system includes global spinal location of the tumor, type and presence of pain, bone lesion quality, spinal alignment, extent of vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral spinal element involvement. Qualitative scores were assigned based on relative importance of particular factors gleaned from the literature and refined by expert consensus.Conclusion
The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score is a comprehensive classification system with content validity that can guide clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine may benefit from surgical consultation. It can also aid surgeons in assessing the key components of spinal instability due to neoplasia and may become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making when put in context with other key elements such as neurologic symptoms, extent of disease, prognosis, patient health factors, oncologic subtype, and radiosensitivity of the tumor.Item Open Access AGA Institute and the Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice Parameters Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.(Gastroenterology, 2020-05) Hirano, Ikuo; Chan, Edmond S; Rank, Matthew A; Sharaf, Rajiv N; Stollman, Neil H; Stukus, David R; Wang, Kenneth; Greenhawt, Matthew; Falck-Ytter, Yngve T; AGA Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee; Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice ParametersItem Open Access American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology.(International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018-03) Mayo, Charles S; Moran, Jean M; Bosch, Walter; Xiao, Ying; McNutt, Todd; Popple, Richard; Michalski, Jeff; Feng, Mary; Marks, Lawrence B; Fuller, Clifton D; Yorke, Ellen; Palta, Jatinder; Gabriel, Peter E; Molineu, Andrea; Matuszak, Martha M; Covington, Elizabeth; Masi, Kathryn; Richardson, Susan L; Ritter, Timothy; Morgas, Tomasz; Flampouri, Stella; Santanam, Lakshmi; Moore, Joseph A; Purdie, Thomas G; Miller, Robert C; Hurkmans, Coen; Adams, Judy; Jackie Wu, Qing-Rong; Fox, Colleen J; Siochi, Ramon Alfredo; Brown, Norman L; Verbakel, Wilko; Archambault, Yves; Chmura, Steven J; Dekker, Andre L; Eagle, Don G; Fitzgerald, Thomas J; Hong, Theodore; Kapoor, Rishabh; Lansing, Beth; Jolly, Shruti; Napolitano, Mary E; Percy, James; Rose, Mark S; Siddiqui, Salim; Schadt, Christof; Simon, William E; Straube, William L; St James, Sara T; Ulin, Kenneth; Yom, Sue S; Yock, Torunn IA substantial barrier to the single- and multi-institutional aggregation of data to supporting clinical trials, practice quality improvement efforts, and development of big data analytics resource systems is the lack of standardized nomenclatures for expressing dosimetric data. To address this issue, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 263 was charged with providing nomenclature guidelines and values in radiation oncology for use in clinical trials, data-pooling initiatives, population-based studies, and routine clinical care by standardizing: (1) structure names across image processing and treatment planning system platforms; (2) nomenclature for dosimetric data (eg, dose-volume histogram [DVH]-based metrics); (3) templates for clinical trial groups and users of an initial subset of software platforms to facilitate adoption of the standards; (4) formalism for nomenclature schema, which can accommodate the addition of other structures defined in the future. A multisociety, multidisciplinary, multinational group of 57 members representing stake holders ranging from large academic centers to community clinics and vendors was assembled, including physicists, physicians, dosimetrists, and vendors. The stakeholder groups represented in the membership included the AAPM, American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), NRG Oncology, European Society for Radiation Oncology (ESTRO), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), Children's Oncology Group (COG), Integrating Healthcare Enterprise in Radiation Oncology (IHE-RO), and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine working group (DICOM WG); A nomenclature system for target and organ at risk volumes and DVH nomenclature was developed and piloted to demonstrate viability across a range of clinics and within the framework of clinical trials. The final report was approved by AAPM in October 2017. The approval process included review by 8 AAPM committees, with additional review by ASTRO, European Society for Radiation Oncology (ESTRO), and American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD). This Executive Summary of the report highlights the key recommendations for clinical practice, research, and trials.Item Open Access Developing Treatment Guidelines During a Pandemic Health Crisis: Lessons Learned From COVID-19.(Annals of internal medicine, 2021-08) Kuriakose, Safia; Singh, Kanal; Pau, Alice K; Daar, Eric; Gandhi, Rajesh; Tebas, Pablo; Evans, Laura; Gulick, Roy M; Lane, H Clifford; Masur, Henry; NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel; Aberg, Judith A; Adimora, Adaora A; Baker, Jason; Kreuziger, Lisa Baumann; Bedimo, Roger; Belperio, Pamela S; Cantrill, Stephen V; Coopersmith, Craig M; Davis, Susan L; Dzierba, Amy L; Gallagher, John J; Glidden, David V; Grund, Birgit; Hardy, Erica J; Hinkson, Carl; Hughes, Brenna L; Johnson, Steven; Keller, Marla J; Kim, Arthur Y; Lennox, Jeffrey L; Levy, Mitchell M; Li, Jonathan Z; Martin, Greg S; Naggie, Susanna; Pavia, Andrew T; Seam, Nitin; Simpson, Steven Q; Swindells, Susan; Tien, Phyllis; Waghmare, Alpana A; Wilson, Kevin C; Yazdany, Jinoos; Zachariah, Philip; Campbell, Danielle M; Harrison, Carly; Burgess, Timothy; Francis, Joseph; Sheikh, Virginia; Uyeki, Timothy M; Walker, Robert; Brooks, John T; Ortiz, Laura Bosque; Davey, Richard T; Doepel, Laurie K; Eisinger, Robert W; Han, Alison; Higgs, Elizabeth S; Nason, Martha C; Crew, Page; Lerner, Andrea M; Lund, Claire; Worthington, ChristopherThe development of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines began in March 2020 in response to a request from the White House Coronavirus Task Force. Within 4 days of the request, the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel was established and the first meeting took place (virtually-as did subsequent meetings). The Panel comprises 57 individuals representing 6 governmental agencies, 11 professional societies, and 33 medical centers, plus 2 community members, who have worked together to create and frequently update the guidelines on the basis of evidence from the most recent clinical studies available. The initial version of the guidelines was completed within 2 weeks and posted online on 21 April 2020. Initially, sparse evidence was available to guide COVID-19 treatment recommendations. However, treatment data rapidly accrued based on results from clinical studies that used various study designs and evaluated different therapeutic agents and approaches. Data have continued to evolve at a rapid pace, leading to 24 revisions and updates of the guidelines in the first year. This process has provided important lessons for responding to an unprecedented public health emergency: Providers and stakeholders are eager to access credible, current treatment guidelines; governmental agencies, professional societies, and health care leaders can work together effectively and expeditiously; panelists from various disciplines, including biostatistics, are important for quickly developing well-informed recommendations; well-powered randomized clinical trials continue to provide the most compelling evidence to guide treatment recommendations; treatment recommendations need to be developed in a confidential setting free from external pressures; development of a user-friendly, web-based format for communicating with health care providers requires substantial administrative support; and frequent updates are necessary as clinical evidence rapidly emerges.Item Open Access Guidelines for cognitive behavioral training within doctoral psychology programs in the United States: report of the Inter-organizational Task Force on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology Doctoral Education.(Behav Ther, 2012-12) Klepac, Robert K; Ronan, George F; Andrasik, Frank; Arnold, Kevin D; Belar, Cynthia D; Berry, Sharon L; Christofff, Karen A; Craighead, Linda W; Dougher, Michael J; Dowd, E Thomas; Herbert, James D; McFarr, Lynn M; Rizvi, Shireen L; Sauer, Eric M; Strauman, Timothy J; Inter-organizational Task Force on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology Doctoral EducationThe Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies initiated an interorganizational task force to develop guidelines for integrated education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology at the doctoral level in the United States. Fifteen task force members representing 16 professional associations participated in a year-long series of conferences, and developed a consensus on optimal doctoral education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology. The recommendations assume solid foundational training that is typical within applied psychology areas such as clinical and counseling psychology programs located in the United States. This article details the background, assumptions, and resulting recommendations specific to doctoral education and training in cognitive and behavioral psychology, including competencies expected in the areas of ethics, research, and practice.Item Open Access Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee.(Spine, 2011-05) Smith, Justin S; Sansur, Charles A; Donaldson, William F; Perra, Joseph H; Mudiyam, Ram; Choma, Theodore J; Zeller, Reinhard D; Knapp, D Raymond; Noordeen, Hilali H; Berven, Sigurd H; Goytan, Michael J; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Shaffrey, Christopher IStudy design
Retrospective review.Objective
Our objective was to assess the short-term complication rate in patients undergoing treatment of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity (FSPD).Summary of background data
The reported morbidity and mortality for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar FSPD is varied and based on studies with small sample sizes. Further studies are needed to better assess FSPD complication rate, and the factors that influence it.Methods
The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity and Mortality Database was queried to identify cases of thoracolumbar FSPD from 2004 to 2007. Complications were analyzed based on correction technique, surgical approach, surgeon experience (SRS membership status used as a surrogate), patient age, and history of prior surgery.Results
Five hundred and seventy-eight cases of FSPD were identified. Osteotomies were performed in 402 cases (70%), including 215 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO), 135 Smith-Petersen osteotomies (SPO), 19 anterior discectomy with corpectomy procedures (ADC), 18 vertebral column resections (VCR), and 15 unspecified osteotomies. There were 170 complications (29.4%) in 132 patients. There were three deaths (0.5%). The most common complications were durotomy (5.9%), wound infection (3.8%), new neurologic deficit (3.8%), implant failure (1.7%), wound hematoma (1.6%), epidural hematoma (1.4%), and pulmonary embolism (1.0%). Procedures including an osteotomy had a higher complication rate (34.8%) than cases not including an osteotomy (17.0%, P < 0.001), and this remained significant after adjusting for the effects of patient age, surgeon experience, and history of prior surgery (P = 0.003, odds ratio = 2.070, 95% CI = 1.291-3.321). Not significantly associated with complication rate were patient age (P = 0.68), surgeon experience (P = 0.18), and history of prior surgery (P = 0.10). Complication rates were progressively higher from no osteotomy (17.0%), to SPO (28.1%), to PSO (39.1%), to VCR (61.1%).Conclusion
The short-term complication rate for treatment of FSPD is 29.4%. The complication rate was significantly higher in patients undergoing osteotomies, and more aggressive osteotomies were associated with progressively higher complication rates.Item Open Access The Challenge of Community Representation.(J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2016-10) Lawrence, Carlton; Stewart, KearsleyAlthough community advisory boards (CABs) are widely used in clinical research, there is limited data regarding their composition and structure, especially in Africa. Our research provides the first qualitative study of the membership practices, selection methods, and qualifications of the six major HIV research centers that comprise the Ugandan National CAB Network (UNCN). Researchers conducted interviews ( n = 45) with CAB members and research liaisons at each of the sites. While selection practices and demographics varied between the sites, all six CABs exclusively followed a broad community membership model. Results suggest successful CABs are context dependent and thus distinct guidelines may be needed based on variables including CAB funding level, representation model, and research focus.Item Open Access Trends in hospital librarianship and hospital library services: 1989 to 2006.(J Med Libr Assoc, 2009-10) Thibodeau, Patricia L; Funk, Carla JOBJECTIVE: The research studied the status of hospital librarians and library services to better inform the Medical Library Association's advocacy activities. METHODS: The Vital Pathways Survey Subcommittee of the Task Force on Vital Pathways for Hospital Librarians distributed a web-based survey to hospital librarians and academic health sciences library directors. The survey results were compared to data collected in a 1989 survey of hospital libraries by the American Hospital Association in order to identify any trends in hospital libraries, roles of librarians, and library services. A web-based hospital library report form based on the survey questions was also developed to more quickly identify changes in the status of hospital libraries on an ongoing basis. RESULTS: The greatest change in library services between 1989 and 2005/06 was in the area of access to information, with 40% more of the respondents providing access to commercial online services, 100% more providing access to Internet resources, and 28% more providing training in database searching and use of information resources. Twenty-nine percent (n = 587) of the 2005/06 respondents reported a decrease in staff over the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Survey data support reported trends of consolidation of hospitals and hospital libraries and additions of new services. These services have likely required librarians to acquire new skills. It is hoped that future surveys will be undertaken to continue to study these trends.