Browsing by Subject "Anti-Infective Agents, Local"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease CLABSIs in Non-ICU Settings.(Quality management in health care, 2023-07) Engel, Jill; Meyer, Britt M; McNeil, Gloria Alston; Hicks, Tammi; Bhandari, Kalpana; Hatch, Daniel; Granger, Bradi B; Reynolds, Staci SBackground and objectives
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a common, preventable healthcare-associated infection. In our 3-hospital health system, CLABSI rates in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings were above the internal target rate of zero. A robust quality improvement (QI) project to reduce non-ICU CLABSIs was undertaken by a team of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared nurse leaders enrolled in a post-DNP Quality Implementation Scholars program and 2 QI experts. Based on a review of the literature and local root cause analyses, the QI team implemented the evidence-based practice of using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) cloths for daily bathing for non-ICU patients with a central line.Methods
A pre-post-design was used for this QI study. CHG bathing was implemented using multifaceted educational strategies that included an e-learning module, printed educational materials, educational outreach, engagement of unit-based CLABSI champions, and an electronic reminder in the electronic health record. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the change in CLABSI rates before and after implementation of CHG bathing. CLABSI rates were also tracked using statistical process control (SPC) charts to monitor stability over time. CHG bathing documentation compliance was audited as a process measure. These audit data were provided to unit-based leadership (nurse managers and clinical team leaders) on a monthly basis. A Qualtrics survey was also disseminated to nursing leadership to evaluate their satisfaction with the CHG bathing implementation processes.Results
Thirty-four non-ICU settings participated in the QI study, including general medical/surgical units and specialty areas (oncology, neurosciences, cardiac, orthopedic, and pediatrics). While the change in CLABSI rates after the intervention was not statistically significant ( b = -0.35, P = .15), there was a clinically significant CLABSI rate reduction of 22.8%. Monitoring the SPC charts demonstrated that CLABSI rates remained stable after the intervention at all 3 hospitals as well as the health system. CHG bathing documentation compliance increased system-wide from 77% (January 2020) to 94% (February 2021). Overall, nurse leaders were satisfied with the CHG bathing implementation process.Conclusions
To sustain this practice change in non-ICU settings, booster sessions will be completed at least on an annual basis. This study provides further support for using CHG cloths for daily patient bathing in the non-ICU setting.Item Open Access Alcohol skin preparation causes surgical fires.(Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2012-03) Rocos, B; Donaldson, LJIntroduction
Surgical fires are a rare but serious preventable safety risk in modern hospitals. Data from the US show that up to 650 surgical fires occur each year, with up to 5% causing death or serious harm. This study used the National Reporting and Learning Service (NRLS) database at the National Patient Safety Agency to explore whether spirit-based surgical skin preparation fluid contributes to the cause of surgical fires.Methods
The NRLS database was interrogated for all incidents of surgical fires reported between 1 March 2004 and 1 March 2011. Each report was scrutinised manually to discover the cause of the fire.Results
Thirteen surgical fires were reported during the study period. Of these, 11 were found to be directly related to spirit-based surgical skin preparation or preparation soaked swabs and drapes.Conclusions
Despite manufacturer's instructions and warnings, surgical fires continue to occur. Guidance published in the UK and US states that spirit-based skin preparation solutions should continue to be used but sets out some precautions. It may be that fire risk should be included in pre-surgical World Health Organization checklists or in the surgical training curriculum. Surgical staff should be aware of the risk that spirit-based skin preparation fluids pose and should take action to minimise the chance of fire occurring.Item Open Access Implementation Strategies to Improve Evidence-Based Bathing Practices in a Neuro ICU.(Journal of nursing care quality, 2019-04) Reynolds, Staci Sue; Sova, Chris; McNalty, Bridget; Lambert, Suzanne; Granger, BradiBackground
Evidence supports daily bathing using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) cloths to decrease preventable hospital-acquired central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). However, implementation of this practice is inconsistent. Using multifaceted strategies to promote implementation is supported in the literature, yet there is a gap in knowing which strategies are most successful.Purpose
Using the Grol and Wensing Model of Implementation as a guide, the purpose of this study was to determine whether using tailored, multifaceted strategies would improve implementation of daily CHG bathing and decrease CLABSIs in a large neuro ICU.Methods
An observational pre-/postdesign was used.Results
Following implementation, infection rates decreased (P = .031). Statistically significant improvements were also seen across all process measures: bathing documentation, nursing knowledge, and perceived importance of CHG bathing.Conclusions
This study assists in closing the research-practice gap by using tailored, multifaceted implementation strategies to increase use of evidence-based nursing care for infection prevention practices.Item Open Access Program Evaluation of Implementation Science Outcomes From an Intervention to Improve Compliance With Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing: A Qualitative Study.(Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN, 2022-07) Reynolds, Staci S; Woltz, Patricia; Keating, Edward; Neff, Janice; Elliott, Jennifer; Granger, Bradi BBackground and objectives
Evaluation of implementation science research is warranted to better understand and determine the success of translating evidence-based infection prevention practices at the bedside. The purpose of this program evaluation was to evaluate implementation outcomes from the perspectives of nurses and nursing leaders regarding a previously conducted chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing implementation science study among 14 critical care units.Methods
Focus groups and interviews, using semistructured interview questions, were conducted to examine the perceptions of nurses who participated in a CHG bathing implementation science study. A deductive qualitative analysis using Proctor and colleagues' implementation outcomes framework was used. Transcripts were analyzed and categorized using the framework as a predetermined code list to structure the implementation outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, feasibility, and sustainability.Findings
A total of 19 nurses and nurse leaders participated in a focus group or interview. Participants noted that both implementation strategies used in the initial study (educational outreach and audit and feedback) were acceptable and appropriate and expressed that the evidence-based CHG bathing practice was feasible to integrate into practice and was being adopted.Discussion
The program evaluation identified strengths and opportunities for improvement related to the implementation strategies and evidence-based CHG bathing protocol. Findings can inform future studies that seek to implement CHG bathing protocols in the critical care setting using audit and feedback and educational outreach strategies.Item Open Access Reduction in patient refusal of CHG bathing.(American journal of infection control, 2023-09) Destine, Yvette; Capes, Kellie; Reynolds, Staci SBackground
Daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing is a well-supported intervention to reduce patient's risk of central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI); however, compliance with this practice is suboptimal. One major barrier is patient refusals of CHG bathing. The purpose of this project was to implement tailored interventions to mitigate this barrier. The specific aims were to reduce patient refusals, increase compliance with CHG bathing, and evaluate CLABSI rates and nursing staff's knowledge of CHG bathing.Methods
Iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented over the course of 6 months. Run charts were used to identify signals of improvement. Interventions included printed educational flyers for staff and patients, educational sessions, an electronic learning module, and a "badge buddy."Results
We saw a reduction in the median percentage of patient refusals documented, from 23% to 8% after the PDSA cycles. Documentation compliance with CHG bathing increased only slightly from 46% to 47%. CLABSI rates decreased 6% from 0.69 to 0.65.Discussion
Using interventions tailored to the clinical setting can impact patient outcomes. Other health care systems should consider implementing PDSA cycles to improve evidence-based practices.Conclusions
Using PDSA cycles can result in a reduction in patient refusal documentation, and may slightly improve CHG bathing compliance and CLABSI rates.Item Open Access Results of the CHlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections Study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.(Implementation science : IS, 2021-04-26) Reynolds, Staci S; Woltz, Patricia; Keating, Edward; Neff, Janice; Elliott, Jennifer; Hatch, Daniel; Yang, Qing; Granger, Bradi BBackground
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in approximately 28,000 deaths and approximately $2.3 billion in added costs to the U.S. healthcare system each year, and yet, many of these infections are preventable. At two large health systems in the southeast United States, CLABSIs continue to be an area of opportunity. Despite strong evidence for interventions to prevent CLABSI and reduce associated patient harm, such as use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing, the adoption of these interventions in practice is poor. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of a tailored, multifaceted implementation program on nursing staff's compliance with the CHG bathing process and electronic health record (EHR) documentation in critically ill patients. The secondary objectives were to examine the (1) moderating effect of unit characteristics and cultural context, (2) intervention effect on nursing staff's knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing, and (3) intervention effect on CLABSI rates.Methods
A stepped wedged cluster-randomized design was used with units clustered into 4 sequences; each sequence consecutively began the intervention over the course of 4 months. The Grol and Wensing Model of Implementation helped guide selection of the implementation strategies, which included educational outreach visits and audit and feedback. Compliance with the appropriate CHG bathing process and daily CHG bathing documentation were assessed. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after the intervention to assess for sustainability.Results
Among the 14 clinical units participating, 8 were in a university hospital setting and 6 were in community hospital settings. CHG bathing process compliance and nursing staff's knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing significantly improved after the intervention (p = .009, p = .002, and p = .01, respectively). CHG bathing documentation compliance and CLABSI rates did not significantly improve; however, there was a clinically significant 27.4% decrease in CLABSI rates.Conclusions
Using educational outreach visits and audit and feedback implementation strategies can improve adoption of evidence-based CHG bathing practices.Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03898115 , Registered 28 March 2019.Item Open Access Self-Reported versus observed audit: Measuring CHG bathing compliance.(American journal of infection control, 2021-12) Reynolds, Staci S; Granger, Bradi B; Hatch, DanielMeasuring compliance with the appropriate chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing process through direct observation audits can be helpful in sustaining this important practice; however, capturing this data may be difficult. This study reports the differences between observed and self-reported CHG bathing process compliance audits. The difference between mean observed and self-reported compliance was not significant (p = .06), indicating that self-reported compliance may be an accurate, easy to obtain proxy measure for CHG bathing process compliance.