Browsing by Subject "Antithrombins"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Defining heparin resistance: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee of Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis.
    (Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2023-12) Levy, Jerrold H; Sniecinski, Roman M; Rocca, Bianca; Ghadimi, Kamrouz; Douketis, James; Frere, Corinne; Helms, Julie; Iba, Toshiaki; Koster, Andreas; Lech, Tara K; Maier, Cheryl L; Neal, Mathew D; Scarlestscu, Ecatarina; Spyropoulos, Alex; Steiner, Marie E; Tafur, Alfonso J; Tanaka, Kenichi A; Connors, Jean M
    The term heparin resistance (HR) is used by clinicians without specific criteria. We performed a literature search and surveyed our SSC membership to better define the term when applied to medical and intensive care unit patients. The most common heparin dosing strategy reported in the literature (53%) and by survey respondents (80.4%) was the use of weight-based dosing. Heparin monitoring results were similar based on the proportion of publications and respondents that reported the use of anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time. The most common literature definition of HR was >35 000 U/d, but no consensus was reported among survey respondents regarding weight-based and the total dose of heparin when determining resistance. Respondent consensus on treating HR included antithrombin supplementation, direct thrombin inhibitors, or administering more heparin as the strategies available for treating HR. A range of definitions for HR exist. Given the common use of heparin weight-based dosing, future publications employing the term HR should include weight-based definitions, monitoring assay, and target level used. Further work is needed to develop a consensus for defining HR.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin.
    (Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2013-09) Zalesak, Martin; Siu, Kimberly; Francis, Kevin; Yu, Chen; Alvrtsyan, Hasmik; Rao, Yajing; Walker, David; Sander, Stephen; Miyasato, Gavin; Matchar, David; Sanchez, Herman

    Background

    Oral anticoagulation therapy is the primary tool in reducing stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but is underused. Patients nonpersistent with therapy contribute to this underuse. The objective of this study was to compare persistence rates in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with warfarin versus dabigatran as their oral anticoagulation.

    Methods and results

    US Department of Defense administrative claims were used to identify patients receiving warfarin or dabigatran between October 28, 2010, and June 30, 2012. Patient records were examined for a minimum of 12 months before index date to restrict the analyses to those newly diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and naive-to-treatment, identifying 1775 on warfarin and 3370 on dabigatran. Propensity score matching was used to identify 1745 matched pairs. Persistence was defined as time on therapy to discontinuation. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict persistence over time. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the factors significantly associated with persistence. Using a 60-day permissible medication gap, the persistence rates were higher for dabigatran than for warfarin at both 6 months (72% versus 53%) and 1 year (63% versus 39%). Patients on dabigatran with a low-to-moderate risk of stroke (CHADS2<2) or with a higher bleed risk (HEMORR2HAGES>3) had a higher likelihood of nonpersistence (hazard ratios, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.60; P<0.001; and hazard ratios, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.47; P=0.016).

    Conclusions

    Patients who initiated dabigatran treatment were more persistent than patients who began warfarin treatment. Within each cohort, patients with lower stroke risk were more likely to discontinue therapy.