Browsing by Subject "Biological Markers"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Open Access
A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging.
(Radiology, 2011-03) Buckler, Andrew J; Bresolin, Linda; Dunnick, N Reed; Sullivan, Daniel C; Group
Medical imaging has seen substantial and rapid technical advances during the past decade, including advances in image acquisition devices, processing and analysis software, and agents to enhance specificity. Traditionally, medical imaging has defined anatomy, but increasingly newer, more advanced, imaging technologies provide biochemical and physiologic information based on both static and dynamic modalities. These advanced technologies are important not only for detecting disease but for characterizing and assessing change of disease with time or therapy. Because of the rapidity of these advances, research to determine the utility of quantitative imaging in either clinical research or clinical practice has not had time to mature. Methods to appropriately develop, assess, regulate, and reimburse must be established for these advanced technologies. Efficient and methodical processes that meet the needs of stakeholders in the biomedical research community, therapeutics developers, and health care delivery enterprises will ultimately benefit individual patients. To help address this, the authors formed a collaborative program-the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance. This program draws from the very successful precedent set by the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise effort but is adapted to the needs of imaging science. Strategic guidance supporting the development, qualification, and deployment of quantitative imaging biomarkers will lead to improved standardization of imaging tests, proof of imaging test performance, and greater use of imaging to predict the biologic behavior of tissue and monitor therapy response. These, in turn, confer value to corporate stakeholders, providing incentives to bring new and innovative products to market.
Open Access
Application of the estrogen threshold hypothesis to the physiologic hypoestrogenemia of lactation.
(Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2015-03) Agarwal, Sanjay K; Kim, Julie; Korst, Lisa M; Hughes, Claude L
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the impact of breastfeeding on hypoestrogenic symptoms among women in the postpartum period and correlated these findings with the Estrogen Threshold Hypothesis, which postulates that the hypoestrogenic symptoms experienced are related to circulating estrogen levels. STUDY DESIGN: Using a survey instrument that combined previously validated assessments of postpartum mood changes and menopausal symptoms, women were evaluated in the immediate postpartum period, prior to hospital discharge, and at 3 and 6 weeks postpartum. Each time period was analyzed independently, in a cross-sectional design, where women were categorized as "breastfeeding" or "bottle feeding." RESULTS: Of 236 women recruited, 171 (72.5%) intended to breastfeed, and 62 (26.3%) intended to bottle feed. At both the 3- and 6-week postpartum evaluations, a similar percentage of women in the breastfeeding and bottle-feeding groups reported hot flashes. However, breastfeeding women were more likely to report vaginal dryness than those who did not breastfeed: 20/150 (13.3%) versus 3/80 (3.8%) at 3 weeks, p<0.05; 25/143 (17.5%) versus 2/87 (2.3%) at 6 weeks, p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The Estrogen Threshold Hypothesis accurately predicts the findings of increased reported vaginal dryness but not hot flashes during lactation.
Open Access
Translational toxicology: a developmental focus for integrated research strategies.
(BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2013-01) Hughes, Claude; Waters, Michael; Allen, David; Obasanjo, Iyabo
BACKGROUND: Given that toxicology studies the potential adverse effects of environmental exposures on various forms of life and that clinical toxicology typically focuses on human health effects, what can and should the relatively new term of "translational toxicology" be taken to mean? DISCUSSION: Our assertion is that the core concept of translational toxicology must incorporate existing principles of toxicology and epidemiology, but be driven by the aim of developing safe and effective interventions beyond simple reduction or avoidance of exposure to prevent, mitigate or reverse adverse human health effects of exposures.The field of toxicology has now reached a point where advances in multiple areas of biomedical research and information technologies empower us to make fundamental transitions in directly impacting human health. Translational toxicology must encompass four action elements as follows: 1) Assessing human exposures in critical windows across the lifespan; 2) Defining modes of action and relevance of data from animal models; 3) Use of mathematical models to develop plausible predictions as the basis for: 4) Protective and restorative human health interventions. The discussion focuses on the critical window of in-utero development. SUMMARY: Exposure assessment, basic toxicology and development of certain categories of mathematical models are not new areas of research; however overtly integrating these in order to conceive, assess and validate effective interventions to mitigate or reverse adverse effects of environmental exposures is our novel opportunity. This is what we should do in translational toxicology so that we have a portfolio of interventional options to improve human health that include both minimizing exposures and specific preventative/restorative/mitigative therapeutics.