Browsing by Subject "Biology, Zoology"

A long-held assumption in animal behavior is that females and males differ fundamentally in their mating strategies. Females are thought to be more choosy because female reproduction typically is limited by parental investment. Males, on the other hand, are expected to compete among themselves for access to females or resources, since male reproduction is limited primarily by mating access. This dichotomy is challenged by the increasing realization that males can be choosy and females also compete aggressively. It remains unclear, however, if and how selection acts on aggressive behavior in the context of intrasexual competition among females (reviewed in Chapter 1). In this thesis, I use a population of free-living tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) to test predictions about the selective pressures shaping aggressive behavior in females. First, using an experimental manipulation of nest site availability, I demonstrate that more aggressive females have a competitive edge in acquiring nestboxes, a critical limiting resource required for breeding (Chapter 2). This result shows that more aggressive females are more likely to breed and, thus, that females experience direct selection to be aggressive in the context of competition for mating opportunities. Next, I demonstrate a fitness cost of female aggression (Chapter 3): high levels of aggression in females are not associated with the quantity of offspring, but instead, more aggressive females had offspring of lower quality (i.e. reduced mass). Using a cross-fostering approach, I explore the causal link between female aggression and offspring mass, and I find that a trade-off between female aggression and maternal care best accounts for this cost of aggression. Site differences may create variation in how selection shapes female aggression, but the overall finding that more aggressive females have lower quality offspring indicates that this cost may work counter to selection favoring aggressive behavior in the context of competition over nestboxes. Understanding the evolution of female aggressiveness in a biparental system is incomplete without examining how males may alter the selective environment shaping female behavior. In Chapter 4, I explore the potential role of a female's mate in offsetting the costs of aggression. Males appear to mitigate these costs for their female partners, but not by compensating for poor parenting by aggressive females. Instead, females invest more heavily in reproduction, laying more and larger eggs, when mated to a male that is more different from her own phenotype. If this differential investment outweighs the cost of aggressiveness in terms of offspring quality, then male phenotype may play a key role in understanding the selective pressures shaping the evolution of aggressive behavior in females. Altogether, this dissertation explores the costs and benefits of female aggressive behavior. The focus on aggressiveness as a sexually selected trait in females provides a much needed parallel to the wealth of information already known about the selective pressures shaping sexually selected traits in males.

Humans are more carnivorous than other hominoids. It has been hypothesized that, during the evolution of this increased carnivory, hominins transitioned through a scavenging niche made viable by certain carnivoran taxa (especially sabertooths) that may have lacked the morphology necessary to fully utilize all parts of carcasses (e.g., marrow), therefore leaving an open niche in the form of high-quality scavengable remains available for hominins. In this dissertation, I examine the postcanine dentition of modern carnivorans, using quantifications of occlusal radii of curvature and intercuspid notches, and study the correlation of this morphology with carcass-processing behavior. I use these correlations to deduce the carcass-processing capabilities of the Plio-Pleistocene carnivores of South Africa (a guild for which we have a good appreciation of taxonomic diversity, and that existed at an important time during the evolution of our lineage - possibly the time that we transitioned into that guild), and compare these results with those of previous studies that relied on more conventional morphological measures.

Both radius of curvature and intercuspid notch data do a good job of separating taxa by dietary category, revealing subtle patterns including possible differences in the carcass-processing abilities of fossil and modern members of some extant species. Other strong trends confirm that the "hunting-hyena," Chasmaporthetes, was probably a hypercarnivore, and not a durophage like its modern confamilial taxa. Somewhat surprisingly, results do not support the hypothesis that sabertooth felids were more hypercarnivorous than modern felids. Furthermore, though the sympatric hypercarnivorous taxa were more numerous, so to were the durophageous taxa, with one taxon, Pachycrocuta, probably exceeding the durophageous capabilities of modern durophages.

As such, this dissertation shows no evidence that members of the paleo-carnivore guild were capable of producing higher quality scavengable carcasses than are modern carnivorans, and thus, based on these analyses of fossil carnivorans, it does not appear that high-quality scavengable remains were more available in the Plio-Pleistocene than there are today. Therefore, though there is clear evidence from other sources that hominins did scavenge at least occasionally, this dissertation does not support the hypothesis that there was an open niche consisting of high-quality scavengable remains.

The pace of life history is highly variable across mammals, and several evolutionary biologists have theorized that the tempo of a species' life history is set by external factors. These factors, such as food availability and predation pressure, determine mortality rates. In turn, mortality rate determines the age at maturity. High mortality rate results in early age at maturity; individuals must grow and reproduce quickly because of the high risk of death. Conversely, a low mortality rate is allows individuals to prolong their growth period and reproduce slowly. This theory assumes that growth rates are constant across species, and thus body size is determined by mortality rates.

This project posits that the intrinsic characteristics of species set the pace of life history. Among anthropoids, there is a great deal of variation in growth rates and the pace of life history relative to body size. The hypotheses proposed by this project state that the degree of encephalization in a species determines the growth rates, the length of the growth period, and the adult lifespan. Growing a large brain is costly and requires a prolonged period of development. However, a large brain has the benefit of reducing mortality by facilitating cognitive strategies for food procurement and predator avoidance. This cost/benefit balance results in the pattern of life-history variation in which mortality rates are correlated with the length of the growth period. However, the causal arrows are reversed; instead of the mortality rate determining the age at maturity and consequently the size of the species, the relative brain size of the anthropoid determines the mortality rate and the age maturity.

These hypotheses were tested by determining the body and brain growth trajectories of thirteen anthropoids, and compiling life-history data from long-term studies of these species in the wild. Multi-variate analyses demonstrated that extensive brain growth, whether through prolonged duration or rapid growth rates, results in slow body-growth rates during the juvenile period and delayed age at maturity. In addition, encephalization results in longer adult lifespan. Therefore, this project demonstrated that intrinsic characteristics of anthropoid species determine the pace of their life histories.

Although evolution results from differential reproduction and survival at the level of the individual, most research in evolutionary genetics is concerned with comparisons made at the level of divergent populations or species. This is particularly true in work focused on the evolutionary genetics of natural populations. While this level of inquiry is extremely valuable, in order to develop a complete understanding of the evolutionary process we also need to understand how traits evolve within populations, on the level of differences between individuals, and in the context of natural ecological and environmental variation. A major difficulty confronting such work stems from the difficulty of assessing interindividual phenotypic variation and its sources within natural populations. This level of inquiry is, however, the main focus for many long-term field studies. Here, I take advantage of one such field study, centered on the wild baboon population of the Amboseli basin, Kenya, to investigate the possibilities for integrating functional, population, and evolutionary genetic approaches with behavioral, ecological, and environmental data. First, I describe patterns of hybridization and admixture in the Amboseli population, a potentially important component of population structure. Second, I combine field sampling, laboratory measurements of gene expression, and a computational approach to examine the possibility of using allele-specific gene expression as a tool to study functional regulatory variation in natural populations. Finally, I outline an example of how these and other methods can be used to understand the relationship between genetic variation and naturally occurring infection by a malaria-like parasite, Hepatocystis, also in the Amboseli baboons. The results of this work emphasize that developing genetic approaches for nonmodel genetic systems is becoming increasingly feasible, thus opening the door to pursuing such studies in behavioral and ecological model systems that provide a broader framework for genetic results. Integrating behavioral, ecological, and genetic perspectives will allow us to better appreciate the interplay between these different factors, and thus achieve a better understanding of the raw material upon which selection acts.

This dissertation explores philosophical problems in biology, particularly those relating to macroevolutionary theory. It is comprised of a series of three papers drawn from work that is currently at the publication, re-submission, and review stage of the journal refereeing process, respectively. The first two chapters concern the overarching contours of complex life, while the third zeroes in on the short and long-term prospects of human evolution.

The rhetorical journey begins with a thought experiment proposed by the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. Gould hypothesized that replaying the "tape of life" would result in radically different evolutionary outcomes, both with respect to animal life in general and the human species in particular. Increasingly, however, biologists and philosophers are pointing to convergent evolution as evidence for replicability and predictability in macroevolution. Chapters 1 and 2 are dedicated to fleshing out the Gouldian view of life and its antithesis, clarifying core concepts of the debate (including contingency, convergence, constraint and causation), and interpreting the empirical data in light of these conceptual clarifications. Chapter 3 examines the evolutionary biological future of the human species, and the ways in which powerful new biotechnologies can shape it, for better and for worse. More detailed chapter summaries are provided below.

In Chapter 1, I critique a book-length excoriation of Gould's contingency theory written by the paleobiologist Simon Conway Morris, in which he amasses and marshals a good bulk of the homoplasy literature in the service of promoting a more robust, counter-factually stable account of macroevolution. I show that there are serious conceptual and empirical difficulties that arise in broadly appealing to the frequency of homoplasy as evidence for robustness in the history of life. Most important is Conway Morris's failure to distinguish between convergent (`externally' constrained) and parallel (`internally' constrained) evolution, and to consider the respective implications of these significantly different sources of homoplasy for a strong adaptationist view of life.

In so doing, I propose a new definition of parallel evolution, one intended to rebut the common charge that parallelism differs from convergence merely in degree and not in kind. I argue that although organisms sharing a homoplastic trait will also share varying degrees of homology (given common decent), it is the underlying developmental homology with respect to the generators directly causally responsible for the homoplastic event that defines parallel evolution and non-arbitrarily distinguishes it from convergence. I make use of the philosophical concept of `screening-off' in order to distinguish the proximate generators of a homoplastic trait from its more distal genetic causes (such as conserved master control genes).

In Chapter 2, I critically examine a recent assessment of the contingency debate by the philosopher John Beatty, in which he offers an interpretation of Gould's thesis and argues that it is undermined by iterative ecomorphological evolution. I develop and defend alternative concepts of contingency and convergence, and show how much of the evidence generally held to negate the contingency thesis not only fails to do so, but in fact militates in favor of the Gouldian view of life. My argument once again rests heavily on the distinction between parallelism and convergence, which I elaborate on and defend against a recent assault by developmental biologists, in part by recourse to philosophical work on the ontological prioritization of biological causes.

In Chapter 3, I explore the probable (and improbable) evolutionary biological consequences of intentional germ-line modification, particularly in relation to human beings. A common worry about genetic engineering is that it will reduce the pool of genetic diversity, creating a biological monoculture that could not only increase our susceptibility to disease, but even hasten the extinction of our species. Thus far, however, the evolutionary implications of human genetic modification have remained largely unexplored. In this Chapter, I consider whether the widespread use of genetic engineering technology is likely to narrow the present range of genetic variation, and if so, whether this would in fact lead to the evolutionary harms that some authors envision. By examining the nature of biological variation and its relation to population immunity and evolvability, I show that not only will genetic engineering have a negligible impact on human genetic diversity, but that it will be more likely to ensure rather than undermine the health and longevity of the human species. To this end, I analyze the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic variation, consider process asymmetries between micro and macroevolution, and investigate the relevance of evolvability to clade-level persistence and extinction.

Scallops, a family of swimming bivalve mollusks, have dozens of eyes arrayed along the edges of their valves. Relatively little is known about the form and function of these unusual eyes. To learn more about them, we studied the visually influenced behavior of scallops, as well as the morphology and spectral sensitivity of their eyes. Of particular interest was whether or not the simple neural architecture of these animals constrains the number of visually-influenced behaviors they can perform. We were also interested to learn whether scallop eyes, despite providing relatively poor visual acuity, show optical refinements, such as corrections for spherical and chromatic aberration, that are known from the eyes of animals with better vision. In the following dissertation, Chapter 2 discusses the visually-influenced behaviors of scallops. It has been argued that bivalve mantle eyes only act as predator-detectors, but the behavioral trials described in this chapter suggest that vision may serve additional purposes in scallops. For example, it was found that visual cues relating to flow conditions may influence scallop feeding behavior. Chapter 3 presents a comparative study of scallop eye morphology. Here, it is found that eye morphology varies considerably between scallop species and that highly mobile scallops have better vision than less mobile or immobile species. Evidence is also presented that one of the two scallop retinas may perform tasks of similar importance to all species, such as predator detection, while the other retina may perform tasks more important to mobile species, such as those associated with the visual detection of preferred habitats. Chapter 4 investigates the spectral sensitivity of the two retinas in the mantle eyes of two scallop species. It is found that there is both inter- and intra-specific variation in scallop spectral sensitivity and that color perception in scallops may be influenced by both environmental light conditions and chromatic aberration caused by their lens. The research in this dissertation provides insight into how vision functions in animals that, like scallops, have a vast number of eyes, but a limited capacity for neural processing. Despite such limitations, it is evident that scallops display a wide range of visual behaviors and have eyes with highly-refined optics.

Biodiversity is generated by the process of speciation. Because biological species are defined as populations that are unable to exchange genes with one another, the study of the evolution of reproductive isolation occupies the center of speciation research. A key to deciphering how reproductive isolation evolves is to understand the genetic changes that underlie these barriers to gene flow. Intrinsic postzygotic barriers, such as hybrid sterility or inviability, are known to impede gene flow and especially lend themselves to genetic analysis because of their ease of study in a laboratory setting. Because hybrid sterility likely evolves before hybrid inviability, it potentially plays an important role in the cessation of gene flow. Yet, while their X-linked counterparts have been precisely localized, we remain ignorant of the numbers of and interactions among dominant autosomal loci that are predicted to contribute to F1 hybrid male sterility.

To address this conceptual void, I examine the genetic architecture of hybrid male sterility between the allopatric sister species Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana. First, using a large-scale backcross analysis, I fine-map autosomal QTL from D. persimilis that confer sterility in male hybrids. This fine-mapping shows that loci contributing to hybrid male sterility reside outside chromosomal rearrangements (i.e., regions of reduced recombination) in this allopatric species pairs. In contrast, these QTL do not contribute to hybrid male sterility in the comparable sympatric hybridizing species D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura, as predicted by models that suggest that hybridizing species persist because of broad regions of reduced recombination. Next, I use a serial backcross design to introgress these sterility-conferring QTL from D. persimilis into a D. p. bogatana genetic background devoid of other alleles from D. persimilis. This introgression study tested a prediction of the dominance theory proposed to explain Haldane's rule: dominant-acting autosomal loci should interact with recessive-acting X-linked loci to produce sterile hybrid males. Surprisingly, the results demonstrated that the "composite" dominance of the autosomal QTL is more important than the dominance of individual QTL for producing Haldane's rule: epistasis among loci elevated their dominant effects on sterility such that individually-recessive-acting autosomal QTL can contribute to F1 male infertility. Finally, using recombination to generate independent lines bearing only small segments of the identified QTL regions, I examine whether single or multiple loci within these regions contribute to the overall effect of hybrid sterility. While the effect of one QTL depends on epistasis between several loci within that small region, the effect of the other QTL appears to derive from a single genetic factor. These results suggest that estimates of the number of genes that contribute to reproductive isolation are at best, likely too low and, at worst, unattainable with the mapping resolution attainable by standard backcross and introgression approaches.

This dissertation addresses both evolutionary and genetic hypotheses of intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Hybrid male sterility between D. persimilis and D. p. bogotana clearly involves highly specific and complex interactions between homoospecific loci. The mapping results presented here also lay the foundation for the identification and cloning of multiple autosomal sterility-conferring "speciation genes."