Browsing by Subject "Bone Malalignment"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Comparison of extramedullary versus intramedullary referencing for tibial component alignment in total ankle arthroplasty.
    (Foot Ankle Int, 2013-12) Adams, Samuel B; Demetracopoulos, Constantine A; Viens, Nicholas A; DeOrio, James K; Easley, Mark E; Queen, Robin M; Nunley, James A
    BACKGROUND: The majority of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) systems use extramedullary alignment guides for tibial component placement. However, at least 1 system offers intramedullary referencing. In total knee arthroplasty, studies suggest that tibial component placement is more accurate with intramedullary referencing. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of extramedullary referencing with intramedullary referencing for tibial component placement in total ankle arthroplasty. METHODS: The coronal and sagittal tibial component alignment was evaluated on the postoperative weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of 236 consecutive fixed-bearing TAAs. Radiographs were measured blindly by 2 investigators. The postoperative alignment of the prosthesis was compared with the surgeon's intended alignment in both planes. The accuracy of tibial component alignment was compared between the extramedullary and intramedullary referencing techniques using unpaired t tests. Interrater and intrarater reliabilities were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Eighty-three tibial components placed with an extramedullary referencing technique were compared with 153 implants placed with an intramedullary referencing technique. The accuracy of the extramedullary referencing was within a mean of 1.5 ± 1.4 degrees and 4.1 ± 2.9 degrees in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. The accuracy of intramedullary referencing was within a mean of 1.4 ± 1.1 degrees and 2.5 ± 1.8 degrees in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. There was a significant difference (P < .001) between the 2 techniques with respect to the sagittal plane alignment. Interrater ICCs for coronal and sagittal alignment were high (0.81 and 0.94, respectively). Intrarater ICCs for coronal and sagittal alignment were high for both investigators. CONCLUSIONS: Initial sagittal plane tibial component alignment was notably more accurate when intramedullary referencing was used. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of this difference on clinical outcomes and long-term survivability of the implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why.
    (Spine, 2013-04) Blondel, Benjamin; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Ames, Christopher; Mummaneni, Praveen V; Hart, Robert; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Burton, Douglas; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba; Lafage, Virginie

    Study design

    Multicenter, retrospective analysis of 183 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar osteotomy.

    Objective

    To evaluate cause and impact of posterior postoperative alignment.

    Summary of background data

    Sagittal malalignment in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has shown significant correlation with pain and disability. Surgical treatment often entails correction of deformity by pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO). Key radiographical spinopelvic objectives to reach improvement in clinical outcomes have been previously reported. Although anterior alignment is a cause of poor outcomes, the impact and cause of posterior spinal alignment by PSO has not been reported.

    Methods

    The patient inclusion criteria were age, more than 18 years, with a diagnosis of sagittal plane deformity (C7 plumbline offset >5 cm, a pelvic tilt >20°, or a lumbar lordosis to pelvic incidence mismatch of ≥10°) requiring a surgical procedure involving a lumbar posterior osteotomy and a long fusion. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA): neutral alignment (0 < SVA < 50 mm), anterior alignment (SVA > 50 mm), and posterior alignment (SVA < 0 mm). All patients underwent pre- and postoperative full-length sagittal spine radiography. Differences between groups were evaluated using ANOVA and χ² analysis.

    Results

    Seventy-six patients were postoperatively classified in the anterior group: 59 in the neutral group and 48 in the posterior group. These groups were comparable preoperatively in terms of surgical status (revision vs. primary surgery) and regional alignment (lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis). The patients with posterior alignment were younger and had a significantly lower pelvic incidence (53° vs. 62°), preoperative pelvic tilt (30 vs. 36°), SVA (94 vs. 185 mm) and cervical lordosis (16° vs. 25°) than patients in the anterior alignment group. No significant differences were found in terms surgical procedure. Patients in the posterior alignment group demonstrated a significantly greater change in SVA and pelvic tilt correction (P < 0.05) but with a lower gain in thoracic kyphosis (5 vs. 12°) and reduction of cervical lordosis (4° vs. 22°).

    Conclusion

    A significantly lower pelvic incidence and lack of restoration of thoracic kyphosis may lead to sagittal overcorrection with a posterior alignment. Although the clinical significance of posterior malalignment is still unclear, this study showed a compensatory loss of cervical lordosis in these patients. Particular attention must be paid to preoperative planning before sagittal realignment procedures. Further study will be necessary to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of these patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity.
    (European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012-04) Lafage, Virginie; Smith, Justin S; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank J; Ames, Christopher P; Klineberg, Eric; Arlet, Vincent; Hostin, Richard; Burton, Douglas C; Shaffrey, Christopher I; International Spine Study Group

    Purpose

    Three column thoracic osteotomy (TCTO) is effective to correct rigid thoracic deformities, however, reasons for residual postoperative spinal deformity are poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for poor spino-pelvic alignment (SPA) following TCTO for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

    Methods

    Multicenter, retrospective radiographic analysis of ASD patients treated with TCTO. Radiographic measures included: correction at the osteotomy site, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI). Final SVA and PT were assessed to determine if ideal SPA (SVA < 4 cm, PT < 25°) was achieved. Differences between the ideal (IDEAL) and failed (FAIL) SPA groups were evaluated.

    Results

    A total of 41 consecutive ASD patients treated with TCTO were evaluated. TCTO significantly decreased TK, maximum coronal Cobb angle, SVA and PT (P < 0.05). Ideal SPA was achieved in 32 (78%) and failed in 9 (22%) patients. The IDEAL and FAIL groups had similar total fusion levels and similar focal, SVA and PT correction (P > 0.05). FAIL group had larger pre- and post-operative SVA, PT and PI and a smaller LL than IDEAL (P < 0.05).

    Conclusions

    Poor SPA occurred in 22% of TCTO patients despite similar operative procedures and deformity correction as patients in the IDEAL group. Greater pre-operative PT and SVA predicted failed post-operative SPA. Alternative or additional correction procedures should be considered when planning TCTO for patients with large sagittal global malalignment, otherwise patients are at risk for suboptimal correction and poor outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The clinical impact of global coronal malalignment is underestimated in adult patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis.
    (Spine deformity, 2020-02) Plais, Nicolas; Bao, Hongda; Lafage, Renaud; Gupta, Munish; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher; Mundis, Gregory; Burton, Douglas; Ames, Christopher; Klineberg, Eric; Bess, Shay; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; International Spine Study Group
    STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective review of multicenter adult spine deformity (ASD) database. OBJECTIVES:A recent publication demonstrated that the laterality of the coronal offset is a key parameter that directly impacts postoperative outcomes. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between global coronal malalignment (GCM) and functional outcomes in a North American population of ASD patients with no history of previous surgery. The clinical impact of GCM in patients with ASD remains controversial. METHODS:Primary patients were drawn from a multicenter database of ASD patients and categorized with the Qiu classification: Type A = GCM < 3 cm; Type B = GCM > 3 cm toward the concave side of the curve; and Type C = GCM > 3 cm toward the convex side. In addition to the classic radiographic parameter, the coronal truncal inclination was investigated in regard to the pelvic obliquity. Clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and demographics were compared across the three Qiu Types using analysis of variance. The analysis was repeated after propensity matching of the three types by age and sagittal alignment (PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis). RESULTS:576 ASD patients (mean age 58.8 years) were included. Type B patients had significantly worse functional scores (Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form Survey physical component summary, and Scoliosis Research Society-22) and a more severe coronal deformity in terms of maximum Cobb angle, global coronal deformity angle, and coronal malalignment; they were also older (65.4 vs. 58.8 years, p = 0.004) and displayed more severe sagittal malalignment. Similar findings were observed after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS:This study is the first to establish an association between functional outcomes and the severity of the coronal plane deformity in the setting of a specific coronal curve pattern in patients without previous surgery. Coronal malalignment significantly affects the health status of patients when the offset is greater than 3 cm in the direction of curve concavity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:III.