Browsing by Subject "CI, confidence interval"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Intrasession Repeatability of OCT Angiography Parameters in Neurodegenerative Disease.(Ophthalmology science, 2023-06) Akrobetu, Dennis Y; Robbins, Cason B; Ma, Justin P; Soundararajan, Srinath; Quist, Michael S; Stinnett, Sandra S; Moore, Kathryn PL; Johnson, Kim G; Liu, Andy J; Grewal, Dilraj S; Fekrat, SharonPurpose
To assess the intrasession repeatability of macular OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson's disease (PD), and normal cognition (NC).Design
Cross sectional study.Subjects
Patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, PD, MCI, or NC were imaged. Images with poor quality and of those with diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, or vitreoretinal disease were excluded from analysis.Methods intervention or testing
All participants were imaged using the Zeiss Cirrus HD-5000 with AngioPlex (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Software Version 11.0.0.29946) and repeat OCTA images were obtained for both eyes. Perfusion density (PFD), vessel density (VD), and Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area were measured from 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm OCTA images centered on the fovea using an ETDRS grid overlay.Main outcome measures
Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to quantify repeatability of PFD, VD, and FAZ area measurements obtained from imaging.Results
3 × 3 mm scans of 22 AD, 40 MCI, 21 PD, and 26 NC participants and 6 × 6 mm scans of 29 AD, 44 MCI, 29 PD, and 30 NC participants were analyzed. Repeatability values ranged from 0.64 (0.49-0.82) for 6 × 6 mm PFD in AD participants to 0.87 (0.67-0.92) for 3 × 3 mm PFD in AD participants. No significant differences were observed in repeatability between NC participants and those with neurodegenerative disease.Conclusions
Overall, similar OCTA repeatability was observed between NC participants and those with neurodegeneration. Regardless of diagnostic group, macular OCTA metrics demonstrated moderate to good repeatability.Financial disclosures
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.Item Open Access Repeatability of Peripapillary OCT Angiography in Neurodegenerative Disease.(Ophthalmology science, 2021-12) Ma, Justin P; Robbins, Cason B; Stinnett, Sandra S; Johnson, Kim G; Scott, Burton L; Grewal, Dilraj S; Fekrat, SharonPurpose
To assess the repeatability of peripapillary OCT angiography (OCTA) in those with Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Parkinson disease (PD), or normal cognition.Design
Cross-sectional.Participants
Patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, MCI, PD, or normal cognition were imaged. Those with glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, vitreoretinal pathology, and poor-quality images were excluded.Methods
Each eligible eye of each participant underwent 2 OCTA 4.5 × 4.5-mm peripapillary scans in a single session using a Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 with AngioPlex (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The Zeiss software (v11.0.0.29946) quantified measures of perfusion in the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) plexus in 4 sectors (superior, nasal, inferior, temporal). The average of these sectors was calculated and reported.Main outcome measures
Radial peripapillary capillary plexus perfusion was quantified using 2 parameters: capillary perfusion density (CPD) and capillary flux index (CFI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to quantify repeatability. For subjects who had both eyes included, the average values of each scan pair were used to assess interocular symmetry of CPD and CFI.Results
Of 374 eyes, 46 were from participants who had AD, 85 were from participants who had MCI, 87 were from participants who had PD, and 156 were from participants who had normal cognition. Capillary perfusion density ICC in AD = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.93), MCI = 0.95 (0.92-0.96), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94), and controls = 0.90 (0.87-0.93). Capillary flux index ICC in AD = 0.82 (0.70-0.90), MCI = 0.87 (0.80-0.91), PD = 0.91 (0.87-0.94) and controls = 0.85 (0.79-0.89). There were no significant differences in interocular variation in average CPD and CFI in AD, MCI, or PD (all P > 0.05). Isolated interocular sectoral CPD differences were noted in AD (nasal, P = 0.049; temporal, P = 0.024), PD (nasal, P = 0.036), and controls (nasal, P = 0.016). Interocular differences in CFI in the superior sector in MCI (P = 0.028) and in average CFI for controls (P = 0.035) were observed.Conclusions
Peripapillary OCTA repeatability in AD, MCI, and PD is good-excellent and similar to those with normal cognition. Insignificant interocular asymmetry in peripapillary OCTA suggests neurodegeneration may proceed uniformly; future studies may reveal the appropriateness of single-eye imaging.