Browsing by Subject "Drug-Eluting Stents"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Clinical and angiographic outcomes with everolimus eluting stents for the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
    (Journal of interventional cardiology, 2014-02) Azarbal, Babak; Arbit, Boris; Ramaraj, Radhakrishnan; Kittleson, Michelle; Young, Amelia; Czer, Lawrence; Rafiei, Matthew; Currier, Jesse; Makkar, Raj; Kobashigawa, Jon
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine clinical efficacy, safety, and intermediate clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) in patients with transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD). BACKGROUND: TCAD is a major cause of mortality in patients following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Systemic everolimus in OHT patients has been shown to reduce TCAD. The safety and efficacy of an EES, the Xience V, have not been evaluated in this population. METHODS: Patients post-OHT with hemodynamically significant CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with EES were included. Participants were maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-year post-PCI. We examined procedural success, in-hospital and 1-year mortality, stent thrombosis, angiographic restenosis, and myocardial infarction rates. All patients had follow-up angiography 1-year after PCI. Target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), in-segment restenosis, target vessel failure (TVF), and lumen late loss were noted. RESULTS: PCI was performed in 34 de novo lesions in 21 patients, and 40 EES were placed. Procedural success rate was 100%. Average stent was 16.5 ± 5.1 mm long and 3.0 ± 0.6 mm in diameter. All patients had angiographic follow-up (409 ± 201 days). There was no stent thrombosis, deaths, or myocardial infarctions during follow-up. Two patients had focal in-stent restenosis. TLR rate was 5.9% (2/34), and TVR rate was 11.1% (3/27). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) showed stenosis diameter to be 19.98 ± 17.57%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an EES is associated with a low incidence of TVR and TLR in patients with TCAD. Further studies are needed to determine whether PCI with EES changes long-term outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Downstream coronary effects of drug-eluting stents.
    (Am Heart J, 2011-10) Krasuski, Richard A; Cater, George M; Devendra, Ganesh P; Wolski, Kathy; Shishehbor, Mehdi H; Nissen, Steven E; Oberti, Carlos; Ellis, Stephen G
    BACKGROUND: Antiproliferative agents used in drug-eluting stents (DES) attenuate atherosclerosis, yet DES implantation has been linked to endothelial dysfunction. The downstream effects of DES on new lesion formation have not been previously directly examined. We sought to compare the development of de novo stenoses and need for treatment in the downstream coronary vessel of patients treated with DES or a bare-metal stent. METHODS: Angiographic images and procedural information were prospectively collected on 463 adults who underwent implantation of a single stent in a proximal coronary artery, had an appropriate control vessel for comparison, and subsequently returned for intervention. Propensity matching identified 89 pairs of patients. End points were defined as angiographic identification of a de novo stenosis or need for secondary intervention in the downstream vessel within 12 months of initial intervention. RESULTS: In the overall (P < .01) and propensity-matched cohort (P = .01), there was reduced risk of new lesions downstream to DES. No difference was seen in respective control vessels (P = .14 and P = .99). A reduced need for downstream intervention with DES was seen in both the overall (P = .01) and propensity-matched cohorts (P = .04). No difference was seen in the control vessels (P = .98 and P = .36). Multivariate proportional hazards modeling of known atherosclerosis risk factors identified stent type as the sole predictor for downstream lesions (P < .01) and downstream events (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving DES appear less likely to develop downstream stenoses and events compared with patients receiving bare-metal stents, suggesting beneficial downstream drug delivery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Evaluation of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS Scores for Predicting Long-term Out-of-Hospital Bleeding after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    (Chinese medical journal, 2018-02) Zhao, Xue-Yan; Li, Jian-Xin; Tang, Xiao-Fang; Xian, Ying; Xu, Jing-Jing; Song, Ying; Jiang, Lin; Xu, Lian-Jun; Chen, Jue; Zhang, Yin; Song, Lei; Gao, Li-Jian; Gao, Zhan; Zhang, Jun; Wu, Yuan; Qiao, Shu-Bin; Yang, Yue-Jin; Gao, Run-Lin; Xu, Bo; Yuan, Jin-Qing
    BACKGROUND:There is scanty evidence concerning the ability of Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy and Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ACUITY-HORIZONS) scores to predict out-of-hospital bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to assess and compare the long-term prognostic value of these scores regarding out-of-hospital bleeding risk in such patients. METHODS:We performed a prospective observational study of 10,724 patients undergoing PCI between January and December 2013 in Fuwai Hospital, China. All patients were followed up for 2 years and evaluated through the Fuwai Hospital Follow-up Center. Major bleeding was defined as Types 2, 3, and 5 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition criteria. RESULTS:During a 2-year follow-up, 245 of 9782 patients (2.5%) had major bleeding (MB). CRUSADE (21.00 [12.00, 29.75] vs. 18.00 [11.00, 26.00], P < 0.001) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (9.00 [3.00, 14.00] vs. 6.00 [3.00, 12.00], P < 0.001) risk scores were both significantly higher in the MB than non-MB groups. Both scores showed a moderate predictive value for MB in the whole study cohort (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve [AUROC], 0.565; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.529-0.601, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.529-0.603, P < 0.001, respectively) and in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subgroup (AUROC: 0.579, 95% CI: 0.531-0.627, P = 0.001; AUROC, 0.591; 95% CI, 0.544-0.638, P < 0.001, respectively). However, neither score was a significant predictor in the non-ACS subgroup (P > 0.05). The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup. CONCLUSIONS:CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores showed statistically significant but relatively limited long-term prognostic value for out-of-hospital MB after PCI with DES in a cohort of Chinese patients. The value of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in the whole cohort, ACS subgroup, or non-ACS subgroup.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Exosome-eluting stents for vascular healing after ischaemic injury.
    (Nature biomedical engineering, 2021-10) Hu, Shiqi; Li, Zhenhua; Shen, Deliang; Zhu, Dashuai; Huang, Ke; Su, Teng; Dinh, Phuong-Uyen; Cores, Jhon; Cheng, Ke
    Drug-eluting stents implanted after ischaemic injury reduce the proliferation of endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells and thus neointimal hyperplasia. However, the eluted drug also slows down the re-endothelialization process, delays arterial healing and can increase the risk of late restenosis. Here we show that stents releasing exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells in the presence of reactive oxygen species enhance vascular healing in rats with renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury, promoting endothelial cell tube formation and proliferation, and impairing the migration of smooth muscle cells. Compared with drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents, the exosome-coated stents accelerated re-endothelialization and decreased in-stent restenosis 28 days after implantation. We also show that exosome-eluting stents implanted in the abdominal aorta of rats with unilateral hindlimb ischaemia regulated macrophage polarization, reduced local vascular and systemic inflammation, and promoted muscle tissue repair.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Sex-based differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a report from TRANSLATE-ACS.
    (J Am Heart Assoc, 2014-02-07) Hess, Connie N; McCoy, Lisa A; Duggirala, Hesha J; Tavris, Dale R; O'Callaghan, Kathryn; Douglas, Pamela S; Peterson, Eric D; Wang, Tracy Y
    BACKGROUND: Data regarding sex-based outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for myocardial infarction are mixed. We sought to examine whether sex differences in outcomes exist in contemporary practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI between April 2010 and October 2012 at 210 US hospitals participating in the Treatment with Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) observational study. Outcomes included 1-year risk of major adverse cardiac events and bleeding according to Global Utilization of Strategies To Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definitions. Among 6218 patients, 27.5% (n=1712) were female. Compared with men, women were older, had more comorbidities, and had lower functional status. Use of multivessel PCI and drug-eluting stents was similar between sexes, while women received less prasugrel. Unadjusted cumulative incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiac events was higher for women than for men (15.7% versus 13.6%, P=0.02), but female sex was no longer associated with higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15). Female sex was associated with higher risks of post-PCI GUSTO bleeding (9.1% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001) and postdischarge BARC bleeding (39.6% versus 27.9%, P<0.0001). Differences persisted after adjustment (GUSTO: hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.64; BARC: incidence rate ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.56). CONCLUSIONS: Female and male myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI differ regarding demographic, clinical, and treatment profiles. These differences appear to explain the higher observed major adverse cardiac event rate but not higher adjusted bleeding risk for women versus men.