Browsing by Subject "Duke Athletics"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Duke Athletics Zero Waste to Landfill Initiative(2013-04-26) Victor, Britta; Waters, EsiLandfills are a growing threat to public health, releasing emissions to air, soil, and water. With space and resource constraints, recycling and composting are becoming increasingly economically attractive. Duke, as a leading academic institution, has the opportunity to become a leader in waste reduction. Piloting a zero waste to landfill initiative at Cameron Indoor Stadium will bring the Duke community together to reduce waste while garnering public attention. A zero waste program, in which 90% of waste is diverted from the landfill, can be achieved through upstream, downstream, and courtside changes. Through consumer behavior observations, technology evaluation, and empirical data for waste segregation, we have recommended educational, operational, and product packaging changes to achieve Zero Waste at Cameron Indoor Stadium. These recommendations focus on the addition of composting capacity at Duke, educational initiatives for game attendees and staff, the sourcing of products with easily recyclable or compostable packaging, and negotiations with local recycling facilities to increase acceptance of a variety of materials. This long-term project has the opportunity to expand throughout Duke University and to peer institutions to make the greatest impact.Item Open Access Duke Athletics Zero Waste to Landfill Initiative(2013-04-26) Victor, Britta; Waters, EsiLandfills are a growing threat to public health, releasing emissions to air, soil, and water. With space and resource constraints, recycling and composting are becoming increasingly economically attractive. Duke, as a leading academic institution, has the opportunity to become a leader in waste reduction. Piloting a zero waste to landfill initiative at Cameron Indoor Stadium will bring the Duke community together to reduce waste while garnering public attention. A zero waste program, in which 90% of waste is diverted from the landfill, can be achieved through upstream, downstream, and courtside changes. Through consumer behavior observations, technology evaluation, and empirical data for waste segregation, we have recommended educational, operational, and product packaging changes to achieve Zero Waste at Cameron Indoor Stadium. These recommendations focus on the addition of composting capacity at Duke, educational initiatives for game attendees and staff, the sourcing of products with easily recyclable or compostable packaging, and negotiations with local recycling facilities to increase acceptance of a variety of materials. This long-term project has the opportunity to expand throughout Duke University and to peer institutions to make the greatest impact.Item Open Access Sustainable Materials and Technologies in the Built Environment: Duke Athletics as a Case Study(2014-04-22) Nitschke, DrewIn 2011, Duke University began a major fundraising campaign, with a significant portion of the money being allocated to several construction projects across campus, of which are either currently under construction or within the planning phases. Because of the university’s strong commitment to sustainability, as outlined in Duke’s Climate Action Plan, there’s been significant interest in reducing the environmental impact of these projects. Unfortunately, the Facilities Management Department does not have the necessary resources to successfully analyze the materials and technologies going into these buildings, despite having the desire to do so. Using the Chris and Ana Kennedy Tower – a press box to be shared between Koskinen Stadium and a new track & field facility – as a case study, this project compiles sustainability best practices for use by the Facilities Management Department in the development of this project and those that will follow in regards to the most prevalent materials and technologies. This was achieved through a literature review and life cycle assessment to best understand the environmental impacts associated with each. As a result, individual recommendations were made for each of these, along with overall recommendations that call for great upstream transparency from suppliers and the opportunity for further studies to be done expand the framework that has been established by this study.