Browsing by Subject "Duke University Wetland Center"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Effects of Drawdown on Water Quality and Temperature in Duke University's Chiller Pond(2016-04-21) Giuliano, BrookeThe Duke Pond (or chiller pond) collects runoff from 20% of the Duke University campus and serves as a water source to the adjacent evaporative cooling plant. Due to frequent water withdrawals from the chiller plant, the water levels are expected to fluctuate anywhere from one to four feet daily (1.22 m). This project aims to (1) calculate a water budget for the pond, (2) determine the effects of fluctuating water levels on various water quality parameters, (3) assess whether the pond is compliant with state water quality standards, and (4) determine whether the stream temperature is significantly different at the inflow versus the outflow to the pond. An additional goal was to develop a GIS tool that estimates the annual sediment yield from the Duke pond’s watershed using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). After the pond stabilized I found that dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and specific conductance decrease with increasing water levels in the pond. The temperature is not significantly different at the outflow compared to the inflow stream. For the majority of the 8-month sampling period, dissolved oxygen and pH remain compliant with the state standards. Chlorophyll-a had one occurrence where it exceeded the standard. The USLE tool accurately delineates the watershed for the pond and calculates an annual sediment loss of 168.2 lb/ac/yr.Item Open Access The Role of Riparian Wetland Restoration in Amphibian Conservation(2011-09-02) Anderson, CatherineThe worldwide decline in amphibian populations may be a harbinger of ecosystem degradation. Wetland and stream restoration may counter amphibian population declines by increasing habitat quality, area, and connectivity. Among the causes of amphibian declines, habitat loss and fragmentation are some of the most influential mechanisms contributing to species extinction. Connectivity between streams and riparian wetlands are not only important for stormwater and water quality management, but are also essential for the conservation and management of amphibians. Even with the dramatic expansion of stream and riparian wetland restoration projects nationwide, post-restoration monitoring of the effectiveness of restoration rarely includes assessment of wildlife populations. Assessment of population declines and restoration success requires long-term monitoring. However, long-term amphibian population studies are relatively few in North America and particularly lacking in North Carolina. The effects of integrated stream and wetland restoration on frogs and toads in the North Carolina Piedmont were analyzed, focusing on the Duke University Wetland Center Stream and Wetland Assessment Management Park (SWAMP). Anuran communities were compared in restored and reference riparian wetlands using drift fence and pitfall trap arrays along with auditory surveys. A total of 100 individual amphibians and eight species were detected in traps between summer 2010 and summer 2011. Ten species were detected with auditory monitoring, including three species heard but not seen. Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences among amphibian abundance at restored and reference sites. Mantel tests were used to assess dissimilarity of sites based on species composition. Neither relative abundance nor species richness estimates were significantly different among restored and reference sites, although community composition did differ by restoration status. Differences in community composition did include overlap, however, and future monitoring based on the protocol established in this study should reveal population trends over time. In addition to the SWAMP project’s specific goal of improving water quality, the restored streams and adjacent wetlands are also supporting frog and toad populations similar to those in natural riparian wetlands.