Browsing by Subject "Fluconazole"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access AIDS‐associated Cryptococcus neoformans and Penicillium marneffei coinfection: a therapeutic dilemma in resource‐limited settings.(Clin Infect Dis, 2010-11-01) Le, Thuy; Hong Chau, Tran Thi; Kim Cuc, Ngo Thi; Si Lam, Pham; Manh Sieu, Tran Phu; Shikuma, Cecilia M; Day, Jeremy NAIDS‐associated Cryptococcus neoformans and Penicillium marneffei coinfection has not been adequately studied and poses unique therapeutic challenges in resource‐limited settings. Itraconazole poorly penetrates the central nervous system, whereas fluconazole has poor activity against P. marneffei. We prospectively report management of 1 patient and retrospectively review 7 coinfection cases from Vietnam.Item Open Access Breakthrough invasive fungal infections: Who is at risk?(Mycoses, 2020-10) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Cornely, Oliver A; Chen, Sharon C-A; Thompson, George R; Hoenigl, MartinThe epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised individuals has changed over the last few decades, partially due to the increased use of antifungal agents to prevent IFIs. Although this strategy has resulted in an overall reduction in IFIs, a subset of patients develop breakthrough IFIs with substantial morbidity and mortality in this population. Here, we review the most significant risk factors for breakthrough IFIs in haematology patients, solid organ transplant recipients, and patients in the intensive care unit, focusing particularly on host factors, and highlight areas that require future investigation.Item Open Access Clinical effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in hematology-oncology patients: a retrospective cohort study.(Cancer Med, 2014-06) Kung, Hsiang-Chi; Johnson, Melissa D; Drew, Richard H; Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita; Perfect, John RIn preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), clinical trials demonstrated efficacy of posaconazole over fluconazole and itraconazole. However, effectiveness of posaconazole has not been investigated in the United States in real-world setting outside the environment of controlled clinical trial. We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 130 evaluable patients ≥18 years of age admitted to Duke University Hospital between 2004 and 2010 who received either posaconazole or fluconazole as prophylaxis during first induction or first reinduction chemotherapy for AML or MDS. The primary endpoint was possible, probable, or definite breakthrough IFD. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups, except that posaconazole recipients received reinduction chemotherapy and cytarabine more frequently. IFD occurred in 17/65 (27.0%) in the fluconazole group and in 6/65 (9.2%) in the posaconazole group (P = 0.012). Definite/probable IFDs occurred in 7 (10.8%) and 0 patients (0%), respectively (P = 0.0013). In multivariate analysis, fluconazole prophylaxis and duration of neutropenia were predictors of IFD. Mortality was similar between groups. This study demonstrates superior effectiveness of posaconazole over fluconazole as prophylaxis of IFD in AML and MDS patients. Such superiority did not translate to reductions in 100-day all-cause mortality.Item Open Access Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of voriconazole and fluconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants.(American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2013-09) Mauskopf, Josephine; Chirila, Costel; Graham, Jon; Gersten, Iris D; Leather, Helen; Maziarz, Richard T; Baden, Lindsey R; Bolaños-Meade, Javier; Brown, Janice MY; Walsh, Thomas J; Horowitz, Mary H; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Marr, Kieren A; Wingard, John RPurpose
The cost-effectiveness of voriconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal infections in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients is investigated.Methods
A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the drug costs associated with planned or supplemental prophylaxis and empirical therapy and the costs of treating suspected or documented invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in HCT recipients. Published clinical trial data on 599 patients who received 100-180 days of prophylactic therapy with voriconazole or fluconazole were used to model specified IFI-prevention and mortality outcomes; 6-month, 12-month, and lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, with a bootstrap analysis performed to reffect the uncertainty of the clinical trial data.Results
Estimated mean total prophylaxis and IFI-related costs associated with voriconazole versus fluconazole prophylaxis over 12 months were higher in the entire study population and among patients receiving HCT for diagnoses other than acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but were not significantly different for patients with AML. The cost per IFI avoided ($66,919) and the cost per life-year gained ($5,453) were lower among patients with AML who received voriconazole relative to the full study population. ICERs were more favorable for voriconazole over a 6-month time frame and when modeling was conducted using generic price data. Assuming a threshold value of $50,000 for one year of life gained, the calculated probability of voriconazole being cost-effective was 33% for the full study population and 85% for the AML subgroup.Conclusion
The decision model indicated that voriconazole prophylaxis was cost-effective for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for AML.Item Open Access Isolation, speciation and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates from various clinical specimens at a tertiary care hospital, Nepal.(BMC research notes, 2017-06) Khadka, Sundar; Sherchand, Jeevan Bahadur; Pokhrel, Bharat Mani; Parajuli, Keshab; Mishra, Shyam Kumar; Sharma, Sangita; Shah, Niranjan; Kattel, Hari Prasad; Dhital, Subhash; Khatiwada, Sulochana; Parajuli, Narayan; Pradhan, Manoj; Rijal, Basista PrasadBackground
Candida species are responsible for various clinical infections ranging from mucocutaneous infection to life threatening invasive diseases along with increased resistance to antifungal drugs has made a serious concern. Resistance to antifungal agents has increased during the last decade. Thus, identification of Candida up to species level and its antifungal susceptibility testing has a paramount significance in the management of Candidal infections. The aim of the study was to speciate Candida species and to determine antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida species to antifungal agents.Methods
A total of 100 consecutive Candida species were isolated from 1248 clinical specimens over 7 months period. Growths on Sabouraud dextrose agar were evaluated for colony appearance, macroscopic examination, Gram staining, germ tube test and urea hydrolysis test. Further, they were processed for Candida speciation on CHROMagar. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed as recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M44-A document.Results
Out of 100 Candida isolates, Candida albicans (56%) was the most common species. Among the non-albicans Candida species, Candida tropicalis (20%) was the predominant isolate followed by Candida glabrata (14%). Regarding antifungal susceptibility pattern, Candida species were more susceptible to clotrimazole (82%) followed by fluconazole (64%) and miconazole (44%).Conclusions
Candida albicans was the predominant species responsible for various Candidal infections. Among commonly used antifungal drugs clotrimazole, miconazole and fluconazole were most effective.Item Open Access Leave no one behind: response to new evidence and guidelines for the management of cryptococcal meningitis in low-income and middle-income countries.(The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 2019-04) Loyse, Angela; Burry, Jessica; Cohn, Jennifer; Ford, Nathan; Chiller, Tom; Ribeiro, Isabela; Koulla-Shiro, Sinata; Mghamba, Janneth; Ramadhani, Angela; Nyirenda, Rose; Aliyu, Sani H; Wilson, Douglas; Le, Thuy; Oladele, Rita; Lesikari, Sokoine; Muzoora, Conrad; Kalata, Newton; Temfack, Elvis; Mapoure, Yacouba; Sini, Victor; Chanda, Duncan; Shimwela, Meshack; Lakhi, Shabir; Ngoma, Jonathon; Gondwe-Chunda, Lilian; Perfect, Chase; Shroufi, Amir; Andrieux-Meyer, Isabelle; Chan, Adrienne; Schutz, Charlotte; Hosseinipour, Mina; Van der Horst, Charles; Klausner, Jeffrey D; Boulware, David R; Heyderman, Robert; Lalloo, David; Day, Jeremy; Jarvis, Joseph N; Rodrigues, Marcio; Jaffar, Shabbar; Denning, David; Migone, Chantal; Doherty, Megan; Lortholary, Olivier; Dromer, Françoise; Stack, Muirgen; Molloy, Síle F; Bicanic, Tihana; van Oosterhout, Joep; Mwaba, Peter; Kanyama, Cecilia; Kouanfack, Charles; Mfinanga, Sayoki; Govender, Nelesh; Harrison, Thomas SIn 2018, WHO issued guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and management of HIV-related cryptococcal disease. Two strategies are recommended to reduce the high mortality associated with HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs): optimised combination therapies for confirmed meningitis cases and cryptococcal antigen screening programmes for ambulatory people living with HIV who access care. WHO's preferred therapy for the treatment of HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis in LMICs is 1 week of amphotericin B plus flucytosine, and the alternative therapy is 2 weeks of fluconazole plus flucytosine. In the ACTA trial, 1-week (short course) amphotericin B plus flucytosine resulted in a 10-week mortality of 24% (95% CI -16 to 32) and 2 weeks of fluconazole and flucytosine resulted in a 10-week mortality of 35% (95% CI -29 to 41). However, with widely used fluconazole monotherapy, mortality because of HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis is approximately 70% in many African LMIC settings. Therefore, the potential to transform the management of HIV-related cryptococcal meningitis in resource-limited settings is substantial. Sustainable access to essential medicines, including flucytosine and amphotericin B, in LMICs is paramount and the focus of this Personal View.Item Open Access Randomized, double-blind trial of fluconazole versus voriconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.(Blood, 2010-12) Wingard, John R; Carter, Shelly L; Walsh, Thomas J; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Small, Trudy N; Baden, Lindsey R; Gersten, Iris D; Mendizabal, Adam M; Leather, Helen L; Confer, Dennis L; Maziarz, Richard T; Stadtmauer, Edward A; Bolaños-Meade, Javier; Brown, Janice; Dipersio, John F; Boeckh, Michael; Marr, Kieren A; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials NetworkInvasive fungal infection (IFI) is a serious threat after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). This multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial compared fluconazole (N = 295) versus voriconazole (N = 305) for the prevention of IFI in the context of a structured fungal screening program. Patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT were randomized before HCT to receive study drugs for 100 days, or for 180 days in higher-risk patients. Serum galactomannan was assayed twice weekly for 60 days, then at least weekly until day 100. Positive galactomannan or suggestive signs triggered mandatory evaluation for IFI. The primary endpoint was freedom from IFI or death (fungal-free survival; FFS) at 180 days. Despite trends to fewer IFIs (7.3% vs 11.2%; P = .12), Aspergillus infections (9 vs 17; P = .09), and less frequent empiric antifungal therapy (24.1% vs 30.2%, P = .11) with voriconazole, FFS rates (75% vs 78%; P = .49) at 180 days were similar with fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Relapse-free and overall survival and the incidence of severe adverse events were also similar. This study demonstrates that in the context of intensive monitoring and structured empiric antifungal therapy, 6-month FFS and overall survival did not differ in allogeneic HCT recipients given prophylactic fluconazole or voriconazole. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00075803.