Browsing by Subject "Gene regulatory network"
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access A Systems Level Analysis of the Transcription Factor FoxN2/3 and FGF Signal Transduction in Sea Urchin Larval Skeleton Development and Body Axis Formation(2011) Rho, Ho KyungSpecification and differentiation of a cell is accomplished by changing its gene expression profiles. These processes require temporally and spatially regulated transcription factors (TFs), to induce the genes that are necessary to a specific cell type. In each cell a set of TFs interact with each other or activate their targets; as development progresses, transcription factors receive regulatory inputs from other TFs and a complex gene regulatory network (GRN) is generated. Adding complexity, each TF can be regulated not only at the transcriptional level, but also by translational, and post-translational mechanisms. Thus, understanding a developmental process requires understanding the interactions between TFs, signaling molecules and target genes which establish the GRN.
In this thesis, two genes, FoxN2/3, a TF and FGFR1, a component of the FGF signaling pathway are investigated. FoxN2/3 and FGFR1 have different mechanisms that function in sea urchin development; FoxN2/3 regulates gene expression and FGFR1 changes phosphorylation of target proteins. However, their ultimate goals are the same: changing the state of an earlier GRN into the next GRN state.
First, we characterize FoxN2/3 in the primary mesenchyme cell (PMC) GRN. Expression of foxN2/3 begins in the descendants of micromeres at the early blastula stage; and then is lost from PMCs at the mesenchyme blastula stage. foxN2/3 expression then shifts to the secondary mesenchyme cells (SMCs) and later to the endoderm. Here we show that, Pmar1, Ets1 and Tbr are necessary for activation of foxN2/3 in the descendants of micromeres. The later endomesoderm expression is independent of the earlier expression of FoxN2/3 in micromeres and independent of signals from PMCs. FoxN2/3 is necessary for several steps in the formation of larval skeleton. A number of proteins are necessary for skeletogenesis, and early expression of at least several of these is dependent on FoxN2/3. Furthermore, knockdown (KD) of FoxN2/3 inhibits normal PMC ingression. PMCs lacking FoxN2/3 protein are unable to join the skeletogenic syncytium and they fail to repress the transfating of SMCs into the skeletogenic lineage. Thus, FoxN2/3 must be present for the PMC GRN to control normal ingression, expression of skeletal matrix genes, prevention of transfating, and control fusion of the PMC syncytium.
Second, we show that the FGF-FGFR1 signaling is required for the oral-aboral axis formation in the sea urchin embryos. Without FGFR1, nodal is induced in all of the cells at the early blastula stage and this ectopic expression of nodal requires active p38 MAP kinase. The loss of oral restriction of nodal expression results in the abnormal organization of PMCs and the larval skeleton; it also induces ectopic expression of oral-specific genes and represses aboral-specific genes. The abnormal oral-aboral axis formation also affected fgf and vegf expression patterns; normally these factors are expressed in two restricted areas of the ectoderm between the oral and the aboral side, but when FGFR1 is knocked down, Nodal expands, and in response the expression of the FGF and VEGF ligands expands, and this in turn affects the abnormal organization of larval skeleton.
Item Open Access Elucidating the Evolutionary Origin of the Neural Crest(2016-05-05) Nesbitt, WilliamThe evolutionary origin of the neural crest, an embryonic stem cell population unique to vertebrates, has eluded biologists since its discovery. The neural crest is characterized by its epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, and differentiation into stereotyped tissues of the embryo. These processes require an intricate gene regulatory network (GRN) that controls the signaling required for successful neural crest formation and differentiation into target tissue types. It is hypothesized that the neural crest, like other complex tissues, arose from co-option of existing developmental GRNs, but this has not been tested. Here, I will use an invertebrate deuterostome, the sea urchin L. variegatus, to look for ancestrally conserved circuits of the neural crest GRN. I hypothesize that genes operating in the neural crest GRN will be found in cells of the L. variegatus embryo that undergo similar processes to vertebrate neural crest cells (EMT, migration, etc.), namely primary mesenchyme cells (PMCs), secondary mesenchyme cells (SMCs), pigment cells, and neurons. I have cloned orthologs of vertebrate neural crest genes in the developing embryo of L. variegatus including foxd, phb1, musk, elk3, egr/krox20, and csnrp. Using RNA in situ hybridization, I have found that these genes are expressed in the predicted cell types in sea urchin embryos. Double in situs were then performed for musk / pks and foxd / phb1 to demonstrate co-expression of the gene pairs. Both pairs of genes were co-expressed, indicating that they may be part of the same GRNs. If these connections are shared with the neural crest GRN, it will provide evidence that these small GRNs are ancestral to deuterostomes and were co-opted into a single tissue in the vertebrate lineage, which gave rise to the neural crest.Item Open Access Specification of Mesodermal Lineages Was Altered in the Evolution of the Lecithotrophic Sea Urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma(2019) Edgar, AllisonA striking feature of sea urchin development is specification of molecularly, behaviorally, and morphologically distinct types of mesoderm prior to gastrulation. The echinoderm gene regulatory network (GRN) for mesoderm specification and differentiation has become a key system for understanding GRN evolution. Its details – including transient early signaling, several temporal layers of sub-circuits for cell fate commitment, and terminal differentiation gene batteries – are known in detail for euechinoid sea urchins and from comparative studies for several other echinoderm groups. From these studies, it appears that GRNs were surprisingly stable over several hundred million years of evolution, particularly early in development.
The euechinoid urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma exhibits a highly derived mode of development in which embryogenesis and juvenile metamorphosis co-occur, entailing extensive changes to its axial patterning, gastrulation, and fate map. These changes arose over only ~4 million years since its divergence with planktotrophic urchins. I have performed the first detailed GRN analysis on H. erythrogramma mesoderm. I analyzed gene expression by in situ hybridization and analysis of published whole-transcriptome data. I manipulated embryos by inhibiting cell signaling and mRNA translation using reagents commonly employed in other sea urchins to construct a partial developmental GRN that can be compared to the ancestral planktotrophic sea urchin and to other echinoderm outgroups. I found that H. erythrogramma has lost precocious specification of larval skeletogenic mesoderm and shows extensive changes from planktotrophic euechinoids in transcription factor expression, cell signaling, and cell behavior.
I found that a key early GRN sub-circuit that specifies larval skeletogenic mesoderm has been lost in H. erythrogramma. Skeletogenic cells arise differently in H. erythrogramma, with skeletogenic markers restricted to the archenteron and coelomic pouches and excluded from ingressed mesenchyme, in sharp contrast to other euechinoids with larval skeletons. Furthermore, the role of early signaling that is coordinated by this cell type has changed extensively. H. erythrogramma has lost a requirement for Delta signaling to induce nonskeletogenic mesenchymal mesoderm. These and other dramatic changes to a deeply conserved network in a short evolutionary time frame suggest strong selective pressure, rather than developmental system drift, altered the GRN. The echinoderm GRN stability over long evolutionary time scales thus suggests stabilizing selection rather than resistance to change arising from network complexity. Knowing which elements of the GRN have changed will permit formal tests for selection at relevant genomic loci and comparisons with the GRNs in independently lecithotrophic urchins to better understand how development evolves.