Browsing by Subject "Gillnets"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Bycatch Mortality of Leatherback Turtles in Trinidad's Artisanal Gillnet Fishery(2006) Gass, JordanAlthough listed globally as critically endangered, leatherback turtles maintain a strong nesting population in Trinidad. Trinidad supports an estimated population of 6,000 nesting females, which despite increased beach protection still face significant risk in the form of coastal gillnets. Incidental captures also impact fishers, who incur financial losses in reduced fishing time from net damage and associated repair costs. During the 2005 nesting season, my project used fisher participation in villages in the northeast region of Trinidad to attempt to measure bycatch levels. The methods used to quantify bycatch are described and results discussed. Challenges encountered during the project are also assessed to plan modifications of project methods to enhance fisher participation and confidence in results.Item Open Access Investigation of Seal and Dogfish Depredation in Gillnets(2008-04-18T22:36:55Z) Rafferty, AnthonyImpacts of predation by seals and dogfish on fish caught in gillnets has been largely neglected. This is important in Cape Cod’s Fixed Gear Sector because all discarding associated with predation is counted against the sector’s Total Allowable Catch (TAC). This results in a loss of profits for fishermen within the sector. Between June 3rd and July 3rd 2007, sixty-one gillnet hauls were observed during regular commercial fishing activities in order to investigate predation rates of both species. Allometric regression was used in tandem with weight conversion factors to determine the estimated total weight of eaten and discarded fish in each haul. Spatial relationships and predation rates relative to certain environmental variables were also investigated. Results showed that approximately 2,500 lbs of fish was discarded from a total catch weight of nearly 130,000 lbs because of predation by both seals and dogfish. This represented an estimated $2,500 loss from a total catch value of $64,000, signifying a 3.53% loss of the fishermen’s gross profits. The biggest monetary loss was associated with the monkfish catch. With regard to environmental variable significance, there was a correlation between increased net soak duration and increased predation by both species. The water depth at which nets were set was also significant; however, this was only in relation to seal predation with predation events generally occurring between 25 and 31 fathoms. Seal events occurred mainly over clay and, dogfish over a sandy substrate, however, bias may exist in these latter findings based on the predominance of nets being set on sand. Furthermore, spatial investigations highlighted that fishing practices were taking place in closed and restricted areas. Overall, results suggest that amendments need to be made to the NEFMP to ensure a reduction in discarding associated with predation by seals and dogfish. Also, although the gross profit loss appeared low, further investigations involving net profit loss would place these findings in greater context.