Browsing by Subject "Gun Violence"
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Program Evaluation of a Gun Violence Listening Intervention in Durham, NC(2024) Swandell, JordanThis project sought to evaluate the effectiveness of Prescriptions for Repair (P4R). P4R is a listening intervention in which trained community-based facilitators help survivors of gun violence or the loved ones of victims of gun violence tell their stories. Objectives of the evaluation were to determine to what degree P4R was conducted as designed, assess whether P4R achieved its intended outcomes, assist the project’s leadership and staff know what aspects of the program were effective and why, and help capture lessons that can be applied to other gun violence interventions or to other partnerships between academic/healthcare institutions and community-based organizations. Evaluation questions were developed through a process that involved interviews and surveys of P4R interested parties. Evaluation questions were answered utilizing exit surveys of participants; exit surveys of facilitators; interviews and surveys of P4R leadership, staff, and other interested parties; and review of program administrative data. This evaluation found that nearly all program participants felt that the P4R listening sessions contributed to their personal healing, nearly all program participants felt they had the opportunity to share their thoughts about breaking cycles of gun violence in Durham, nearly all program participants and facilitators believed that P4R can contribute to reducing gun violence, and cooperation between academic/healthcare institutions and local community-based organizations can lay the groundwork for positive change in the community.
Item Open Access Valuing the benefits of reducing firearm violence in the United States.(Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025-01) Cook, Philip J; Jeuland, Marc; Ludwig, JensJustifying a proposed government regulation intended to reduce firearm violence requires a conceptually sound estimate of the monetized value of that impact and how that value is distributed across the population. Some previous estimates do not serve as a valid basis for policy evaluation or are out of date. A nationally representative survey was conducted by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in August 2022 (n = 660). The authors designed and added a series of contingent-valuation items to the questionnaire. Double-bounded estimates of willingness-to-pay (WTP) were derived from a regression analysis of responses regarding voting on a hypothetical referendum on a state-wide package of measures designed to reduce gun violence at specified cost to taxpayers. Average WTP for a reduction of 20% in the state rate of gun violence was $744 per household (IQR:$668-$928), implying a national total of $97.6 billion. Household WTP was positively associated with household income, the respondent's assessment of the seriousness of gun violence in their community and the subjective likelihood that they would become a victim of gun violence. A variety of tests support the claim that this application of the contingent-valuation method provided valid results. WTP is the recognized basis for assessing the value of proposed federal regulations. The estimated WTP for reducing gun violence is about twice as high as a recent cost-of-injury estimate and provides a much different picture of the incidence of costs by income and demographic characteristics.