Browsing by Subject "High seas"
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Assessing fishing vessel compliance with area closures on the high seas(2021-04-30) Mullaney, ClaireHigh seas marine ecosystems are facing a variety of threats, including fish stock overexploitation; the destruction of deep-sea habitats by harmful fishing gears; and illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing. To help combat these threats, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) can implement area-based management tools (ABMTs)—methods of spatial regulation, such as closed areas, that address human impacts on marine spaces by restricting certain activities. While ABMTs offer benefits that can help reduce stress on high seas ecosystems, research suggests that they should be coupled with strong monitoring to best provide these benefits. In the past, insufficient technology posed an obstacle to monitoring high seas fishing effort. However, increasingly common automatic identification system (AIS) data, which are broadcast from fishing vessels and communicate vessel identity and location information, provide an ideal mechanism to assess fishing activity in international waters. To understand vessel compliance with ABMTs implemented by RFMOs, I used AIS data from Global Fishing Watch to evaluate fishing effort inside closures on the high seas from 2017 to 2019. Results revealed that 11 of the 14 ABMTs examined likely experienced some level of illegal fishing across all three years, with a total of 13,259.7 hours of fishing effort classified as illegal based on my analysis occurring in 2017, 12,664.3 hours in 2018, and 14,541.1 hours in 2019. These analyses give insight into the success of current RFMO closures and suggest future considerations in the use of ABMTs by regional fishery bodies.Item Open Access Evaluating Compliance and Enforcement Mechanisms of Regional Fishery Management Organizations(2022-04-22) Barkley, CardenEstablished by international agreements or treaties, Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) manage fisheries on the high seas, or ocean areas beyond national jurisdiction. Countries interested in joining an RFMO for access to highly migratory species such as tuna are subject to legally binding conservation management measures (CMMs) and convention mandates created by the organization. Historically, the overall effectiveness of RFMOs for protecting valuable high seas fisheries and their ecosystems has been called into question and there has been a recent push from consumers for increased seafood traceability. This project critically evaluates compliance and enforcement of CMMs and is a component of a larger comprehensive performance review of the current seventeen global RFMOs by an interdisciplinary team of researchers at Duke, NYU, and the Stockholm Resilience Centre led by Duke Marine Lab PhD student Gabrielle Carmine. In this evaluation, RFMOs were scored using a set of ten different criteria to assess existing compliance mechanisms and understand existing levels of transparency within high seas fisheries management.Item Open Access Evaluating Spatial Management on the High Seas: A Performance Review of Fisheries Closures and Marine Protected Areas(2022-04-22) Tuohy, ChelseaAs the United Nations continues to negotiate a legally binding treaty for the conservation of biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, many argue that a governance gap will be created if species managed by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) and non-target species impacted by fisheries are left unaccounted for. RFMOs are currently unlikely to be affected or held to a higher standard in the new treaty as not to “undermine current legal and regulatory frameworks”. However, the last comprehensive assessment RFMOs, completed in 2010 by Sarika Cullis-Suzuki and Daniel Pauley, concluded that RFMOs were failing to manage high seas fisheries. This review provides an updated performance assessment of how well RFMOs manage fish stocks in areas beyond national jurisdiction through closures and protected areas, a criterion that was not thoroughly reviewed in 2010 due to spatial management not being part of the requirements of RFMOs at the time. The spatial management review is a component of a more extensive comprehensive performance review of the seventeen RFMOs by a team of researchers at Duke University, NYU, and the Stockholm Resilience Centre led by Duke Marine Lab Ph.D. student Gabrielle Carmine. Furthermore, this review highlights vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) as a case study to provide insight into the management regimes and decision-making processes of RFMOs, given that bottom fishing organizations scored highest in the spatial management review.Item Open Access Negotiating Ocean Territory in Bermuda and the Sargasso Sea(2017) Acton, Leslie DianeTo address growing concerns about global oceans health, state and non-state actors have pushed for the establishment of large marine protected areas (LMPAs) in national exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and on the high seas. This push has resulted in a rapid proliferation of LPMAs in recent years, despite limited understanding of their social and political attributes and implications. This dissertation contributes to growing social science scholarship on LMPAs by employing a qualitative, multi-sited case study investigating negotiations over two proposed, overlapping LMPAs in Bermuda’s EEZ and the Sargasso Sea. It engages with human geography theory on territoriality to examine the territorial practices emerging through LMPA proposals and how negotiations over these ‘scaled-up’ management tools are contributing to transformations in global oceans governance. Specifically, it addresses three research questions: (1) What territorial practices do actors use in negotiations over LMPAs? (2) How do these territorial practices produce ocean space? (3) What do these territorial practices reveal about these ocean spaces and human-ocean relations?
To answer these questions, this dissertation traces negotiations over these two proposed LMPAs across space, actors, jurisdictional scale, and time, to study sites including Bermuda, Washington, DC, London, and the 2014 World Parks Congress in Sydney, Australia. Results demonstrate that actors used diverse territorial practices, such as map-making and the promotion of territorial narratives, to negotiate for particular governance outcomes. Some of these territorial practices served to ‘fix’ ocean spaces, belying their continuously emergent material and social realities. Others contributed to altering ocean space despite the absence of any formal regulatory change. Further, analysis revealed that the territorial practices employed during these two distinct, but related LMPA negotiations interacted, producing an unexpected territorial outcome in the Sargasso Sea.
Overall, this dissertation contributes to increasing scholarship in human geography on the emerging territorial processes transforming global oceans governance and, more broadly, human relations with offshore ocean spaces. It presents an empirical study that advances understanding of LMPA negotiations and reveals more diverse interests in and relations to these offshore spaces than traditional conceptualizations suggest. Results from this dissertation could inform ongoing and future LMPA proposals and negotiations through attention to the limits/possibilities produced and revealed by actors’ territorial practices.
Item Open Access Opportunities for enhancing an ecosystem-based approach to pelagic fisheries management in the high seas(2020) Ortuno Crespo, Guillermo AOpen‐ocean fisheries expanded rapidly from the 1960s and currently represent the largest direct stressor on high seas biodiversity and ecosystems. Open-ocean ecological research and the implementation of management actions to mitigate the impacts of fisheries has lagged behind those of coastal and deep-sea environments. I investigate opportunities to enhance a wholistic ecosystem-based approach to high seas fisheries management by: reviewing our understanding of the impacts fisheries across ecological scales, evaluating the gaps and opportunities in the mandates of existing and future governance frameworks and developing methodologies for creating dynamic spatiotemporal management tools to reduce bycatch. Results demonstrate that fisheries are impacting the open-ocean across ecological scales. Results also show that the population trajectories of most non-target species in the high seas are not being monitored by fishing nations, nor relevant fisheries management organizations. A new implementing agreement under the UN to sustainably manage high seas biodiversity could complement the mandates fisheries bodies. There is an opportunity for new technologies and modeling approaches to contribute to the implementation of an ecosystem-based approach to management by generating knowledge on the spatial ecology commercial fisheries and high seas biodiversity. My results show that the distribution of target and non-target species, as well as longline fishing activities are correlated with environmental conditions and that these can be predicted across spatial and temporal scales to inform spatial management of high seas pelagic fishing activities. Implementing an ecosystem-based approach will require embracing a precautionary approach to reduce the bycatch of non-target species, which can be accomplished through spatiotemporal avoidance and improving our monitoring of fisheries impacts across ecological scales.
Item Open Access Spatial Opportunities for High Seas Conservation Under the U.N. Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty(2024-04-25) Barbaro, AllisonAfter 21 years, the United Nations adopted the Agreement under UNCLOS on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, or BBNJ Agreement, in 2023 to provide a legal framework for high seas conservation, as many species are in decline. However, Article V states the agreement will be “applied in a manner that does not undermine” relevant legal bodies, raising concerns for how this long-awaited treaty will reach targets for ocean conservation among contentious international groups. This study identifies the areas of the high seas with the least and largest number of overlapping relevant international bodies (potential low/high conflict). Results indicate a complex patchwork of governance, with the least governed areas at only 0.15% of the high seas. This emphasizes the need for improved cooperation among these institutions for future high seas conservation.