Browsing by Subject "Household air pollution"
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Household Air Pollution from Cooking in Madagascar: Effects of Wood Smoke Exposure on Respiratory Health(2021) Abebe, KuleniBackground: Approximately 3.8 million people die annually from illnesses caused by household air pollution (HAP). Cooking related HAP is the second leading cause of disease in Madagascar. Our exploratory study aims to examine the effect of cooking fuel smoke exposure on lung function and respiratory symptoms.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mandena, Madagascar from 2016 through 2018. Adults aged ≥18 years completed a survey on respiratory symptoms and cooking habits and performed spirometry for FEV1 and FEV6 values. Results: Of the 140 participants, 95 individuals were included in the multiple regression model. Being the primary cooks was significantly associated with decreasing FEV1 (-0.30; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.04) and FEV6 (-0.32, 95% CI: -0.57,-0.06). Cooking indoors significantly decreases FEV6 compared to cooking outdoors (-0.26, 95% CI: -0.50,-0.03). Conclusion: Reduced lung function and increased respiratory disease are most common among primary cooks. Reduced lung function was associated with cooking indoors. Further studies are essential to investigate HAP’s effect on Madagascar communities.
Item Open Access Impact of Policy Options on Accelerating Clean Cooking Transition in the South-East Asian Region(2022-04-15) Zong, JiahuiAround 2.6 billion people globally still cook using solid fuels and kerosene in open fires and inefficient stoves. These inefficient cooking practices produce high levels of household air pollution, causing health damages. Since women and girls often take primary responsibility for cooking and collecting fuels, they are disproportionately affected by traditional cooking, worsening gender inequality. In addition, cooking without clean stoves and fuels also causes severe environmental harms, in the form of harmful, climate-warming emissions and unsustainable harvesting of wood fuels. This study focuses on South-East Asia Region, where 1.54 billion people lack access to clean cooking fuels and technologies. The analysis utilizes the Benefits of Action to Reduce Household Air Pollution (BAR-HAP) Tool developed by Dr. Marc Jeuland and Dr. Ipsita Das at Duke University for the World Health Organization, to assess the impact of different policy interventions on cooking-related household air pollution and related health issues. This tool quantifies and monetizes the costs of interventions to the health system and households, and the benefits to health, time saved, and reduced climate impact. This Master’s Project focuses on three fiscal policies: stove subsidy, fuel subsidy, and stove financing. Although the calculated amount of benefits differs in each country’s case, and the actual implementation might lead to progress that differs from the model’s projection, a faster transition is more cost-beneficial from overall health, gender equality, and environmental perspectives. Based on the results, stove financing is the most cost-beneficial in Bangladesh, rural Bhutan, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, while stove subsidy is the most cost-beneficial in Thailand. Governments in SEAR should also prioritize the rural populations to maximize the return from policy intervention.Item Open Access Seeing Through the Smoke: Measuring Impacts of Improved Cookstove Interventions on Technology Adoption and Environmental and Health Outcomes(2015) Lewis, JessicaTraditional cooking using biomass is associated with adverse health consequences, local environmental degradation, and regional climate change. Improved stoves (ICS; liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), biogas, electric, efficient biomass) are heralded as a solution, but their adoption and use remains low. In the first chapter, I report on a series of pilot programs that utilized the marketing mix principles of promotion, product, price and place to increase stove sales in rural Inia. We found that when given a choice amongst products, households strongly preferred an electric stove over improved biomass-burning options. Households clearly identified price as a significant barrier to adoption, while provision of discounts (e.g., rebates given if households used the stove) or payments in installments were related to higher purchase. Collectively, these pilots point to the importance of continued and extensive testing of messages, pricing models, and responses to different stove types prior to scale-up. Thus, a one-size-fits-all approach will be unlikely to boost ICS adoption.
In the second and third chapters, I analyze the impact of mainly improved stove use on social, environmental, and health outcomes in rural India- first in a sample of biogas stove users in Odisha, India, and next with households in the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand. In both settings, ICS use was associated with reduced use of firewood, substantial time savings for primary cooks, and significant reduction in exposure to particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in household air. I find that ICS users in Odisha spend reduced time in the hospital with acute respiratory infection and reduced diastolic blood pressure, but no relationship with other health measurements.
In the third chapter, I also find significant reduction in exposure to personal air pollution. Using temperature sensors as objective stove use monitors for all stoves and heaters we find that households underreport use of improved and traditional stoves.
These papers provide encouraging evidence of potential for adoption of clean stove and a suite of benefits from clean stove use; however, in order to achieve recommended levels of air pollution additional policies may be needed.
Item Open Access The Price of Purity: Willingness to pay for air and water purification technologies in Rajasthan, India(Environmental and Resource Economics) Shannon, Alexandra; Usmani, F; Pattanayak, SK; Jeuland, MADiarrheal illnesses and acute respiratory infections are among the top causes for premature death and disability across the developing world, and adoption of various technologies for avoiding these illnesses remains extremely low. We exploit data from a unique contingent valuation experiment to consider whether households in rural Rajasthan are unwilling to make investments in "domain-specific" environmental health technologies when faced with health risks in multiple domains. Results indicate that demand for water-related risk reductions is higher on average than demand for air-related risk reduction. In addition, households' private health benefits from mitigating diarrheal (respiratory) disease risks are higher (no different) when community-level air pollution risks, rather than community-level water pollution risks, have previously been mitigated. This asymmetric response cannot fully be explained by survey order effects or embedding, but rather suggests that that the broader health environment and the salience of particular risks may be important in households' decision to adopt environmental health technologies.