Browsing by Subject "Isavuconazole"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Multicenter Registry of Patients Receiving Systemic Mold-Active Triazoles for the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections.
    (Infectious diseases and therapy, 2022-08) Ostrosky-Zeichner, L; Nguyen, MH; Bubalo, J; Alexander, BD; Miceli, MH; Pappas, PG; Jiang, J; Song, Y; Thompson, GR

    Introduction

    'Real-world' data for mold-active triazoles (MATs) in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are lacking. This study evaluated usage of MATs in a disease registry for the management of IFIs.

    Methods

    Data were collected for this multicenter, observational, prospective study from 55 US centers, between March 2017 and April 2020. Eligible patients received isavuconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole as MAT monotherapy (one MAT) or multiple/sequenced MAT therapy (more than one MAT) for prophylaxis or treatment. Patients were enrolled within 60 days of MAT initiation. The primary objective was to characterize patients receiving a MAT and their patterns of therapy. The full analysis set (FAS) included eligible patients for the relevant enrollment protocol, and the safety analysis set (SAF) included patients who received ≥ 1 MAT dose.

    Results

    Overall, 2009 patients were enrolled in the SAF. The FAS comprised 1993 patients (510 isavuconazole; 540 posaconazole; 491 voriconazole; 452 multiple/sequenced MAT therapies); 816 and 1177 received treatment and prophylaxis at study index/enrollment, respectively. Around half (57.8%) of patients were male, and median age was 59 years. Among patients with IFIs during the study, the most common pathogens were Aspergillus fumigatus in the isavuconazole (18.2% [10/55]) and voriconazole (25.5% [12/47]) groups and Candida glabrata in the posaconazole group (20.9% [9/43]); the lungs were the most common infection site (58.2% [166/285]). Most patients were maintained on MAT monotherapy (77.3% [1541/1993]), and 79.4% (1520/1915) completed their MAT therapies. A complete/partial clinical response was reported in 59.1% (591/1001) of patients with a clinical response assessment. Breakthrough IFIs were reported in 7.1% (73/1030) of prophylaxis patients. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 14.7% (296/2009) of patients (3.9% [20/514] isavuconazole; 11.3% [62/547] posaconazole; 14.2% [70/494] voriconazole).

    Conclusions

    In this 'real-world' study, most patients remained on their initial therapy and completed their MAT therapy. Over half of patients receiving MATs for IFIs had a successful response, and most receiving prophylaxis did not develop breakthrough IFIs. ADRs were uncommon.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    (New) Methods for Detection of Aspergillus fumigatus Resistance in Clinical Samples.
    (Current fungal infection reports, 2019-09) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Spiess, Birgit; Buchheidt, Dieter; Hoenigl, Martin

    Purpose of review

    The incidence of invasive aspergillosis has increased substantially over the past few decades, accompanied by a change in susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus fumigatus with increasing resistance observed against triazole antifungals, including voriconazole and isavuconazole, the most commonly used antifungal agents for the disease. Culture-based methods for determining triazole resistance are still the gold standard but are time consuming and lack sensitivity. We sought to provide an update on non-culture-based methods for detecting resistance patterns to Aspergillus.

    Recent findings

    New molecular-based approaches for detecting triazole resistance to Aspergillus, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect mutations to the Cyp51A protein, have been developed which are able to detect most triazole-resistant A. fumigatus strains in patients with invasive aspergillosis.

    Summary

    Over the last few years, a number of non-culture-based methods for molecular detection of Aspergillus triazole resistance have been developed that may overcome some of the limitations of culture. These molecular methods are therefore of high epidemiological and clinical relevance, mainly in immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies, where culture has particularly limited sensitivity. These assays are now able to detect most triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains. Given that resistance rates vary, clinical utility for these assays still depends on regional resistance patterns.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Study protocol: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of isavuconazole prophylaxis for the prevention of covid-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis.
    (Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024-06) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Hoenigl, Martin; Thompson, George R
    During the early stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, those with severe COVID-19 infection were at risk for a number of opportunistic infections including COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). We initiated a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether isavuconazole, a triazole antifungal, could prevent CAPA and improve survival in patients admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19 infection. We designed a phase III/IV randomized, double-blind, two-arm, placebo-controlled trial evaluating standard of care (SOC) plus isavuconazole versus SOC plus placebo and were to enroll participants admitted to the ICU with severe COVID-19 infection at three medical centers in California, United States. The projected sample size was 162 participants. Due to poor enrollment and the declining number of COVID-19 cases over time, the study was terminated after 7 participants were enrolled, all enrolled at one study site (UC San Diego Health). CAPA was suspected in two participants and they were started on open-label isavuconazole. One was withdrawn due to possible isavuconazole-related adverse side effects. Enrollment was slower-than-expected due to multiple factors, including competing COVID-19-related studies and hesitancy from potential study participants or their families to join the study. Our experience highlights some of the difficulties in planning and running a clinical trial focused on fungal superinfections involving severely ill patients during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lessons learned from this study will help in the design of proposed studies examining antifungal prophylaxis against aspergillosis following other severe respiratory viral infections.