Browsing by Subject "Meningomyelocele"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Fractures in myelomeningocele.
    (J Orthop Traumatol, 2010-09) Akbar, Michael; Bresch, Bjoern; Raiss, Patric; Fürstenberg, Carl Hans; Bruckner, Thomas; Seyler, Thorsten; Carstens, Claus; Abel, Rainer
    BACKGROUND: In patients with myelomeningocele (MMC), a high number of fractures occur in the paralyzed extremities, affecting mobility and independence. The aims of this retrospective cross-sectional study are to determine the frequency of fractures in our patient cohort and to identify trends and risk factors relevant for such fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1988 and June 2005, 862 patients with MMC were treated at our hospital. The medical records, surgery reports, and X-rays from these patients were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 11% of the patients (n = 92) suffered one or more fractures. Risk analysis showed that patients with MMC and thoracic-level paralysis had a sixfold higher risk of fracture compared with those with sacral-level paralysis. Femoral-neck z-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) differed significantly according to the level of neurological impairment, with lower z-scores in children with a higher level of lesion. Furthermore, the rate of epiphyseal separation increased noticeably after cast immobilization. Mainly patients who could walk relatively well were affected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with thoracic-level paralysis represent a group with high fracture risk. According to these results, fracture and epiphyseal injury in patients with MMC should be treated by plaster immobilization. The duration of immobilization should be kept to a minimum (<4 weeks) because of increased risk of secondary fractures. Alternatively, patients with refractures can be treated by surgery, when nonoperative treatment has failed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Open and endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele surgeries display similar in-hospital safety profiles in a large, multi-institutional database.
    (American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2023-03) Mikulski, Matthew F; Well, Andrew; Beckerman, Ziv; Fraser, Charles D; Bebbington, Michael W; Moise, Kenneth J

    Background

    Open intrauterine fetal myelomeningocele repair has demonstrated decreased ventriculoperitoneal shunting and improved motor outcomes despite maternal and fetal risks. Few data directly compare the safety of open vs endoscopic approaches.

    Objective

    This study aimed to analyze in-hospital maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant patients undergoing open vs endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair using a large, multi-center database.

    Study design

    This was a review of the Pediatric Health Information System database from October 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. All patients who underwent open or endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, were identified. Demographics, gestational age, and outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive and univariate statistics were used.

    Results

    A total of 378 pregnant patients underwent fetal myelomeningocele repair. The approach was endoscopic in 143 cases (37.8%) and open in 235 cases (62.2%). Overall postprocedural outcomes included no maternal in-hospital mortalities or intensive care unit admissions, a median length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range, 4-5), 14 cases (3.7%) of surgical and postoperative complications, 6 cases (1.6%) of intrauterine infections, 12 cases (3.2%) of obstetrical complications (including preterm premature rupture of membranes), 3 cases (0.8%) of intrauterine fetal demise, and 16 cases (4.2%) of preterm delivery. Compared with an open approach, the endoscopic approach occurred at a later gestational age (25 weeks [interquartile range, 24-25] vs 24 weeks [interquartile range, 24-25]; P<.001) and had an increased rate of intrauterine infection (6 [4.2%] cases vs 0 [0%] case; P=.002). There was no difference between approaches in the rates of surgical complications, obstetrical complications, intrauterine fetal demise, or preterm deliveries.

    Conclusion

    Compared with an open approach, endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair displays a comparable rate of fetal complications, including intrauterine fetal demise and preterm delivery, and a similar in-hospital maternal safety profile despite an association with increased intrauterine infection.