Browsing by Subject "Parent-child communication"

Problem and Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a population with unique age-specific characteristics and often neglected therapeutic needs. Specifically, Korean AYAs with cancer reported greater level of stress that comes from unique cultural and societal characteristics, but there is a lack of support systems to help their healthy adjustment to the cancer diagnosis. Family communication allows family members to share thoughts and feelings openly and clearly with one another, particularly regarding stressful situations. Studies have shown the importance of family support and communication for maintaining psychological well-being in pediatric patients with cancer, yet despite its pivotal role, little attention has been paid to the parent-adolescent communication in the childhood cancer context. We conducted an integrative literature review on facilitators and barriers to parent-child communication in the childhood cancer context and found that most children, AYAs and their parents were struggling to engage in family communication because of their fear related to expected negative outcomes by sharing sensitive topics, such as emotional harms to each other. In addition, they were rarely aware of the potential benefits from engaging in family communication. However, we also found that there was a lack of research on parent-adolescent communication in the Korean childhood cancer context. This gap in the literature makes us to conduct these dissertation studies with aims of: (1) understanding the Korean parent-adolescent communication experiences in the childhood cancer context, and (2) exploring the potential benefits from engaging in parent-adolescent communication in the Korean childhood cancer context.

Methods: The overall dissertation studies were conducted in Korean. First, a qualitative descriptive design study with a sample of 10 AYAs with cancer and their parents was conducted to explore Korean adolescents’ and their parents’ experiences related to therapeutic and emotional communication in the childhood cancer context. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted in Korean. The interview transcripts were translated and analyzed using a traditional content analysis, generating themes. Based upon the findings, we designed a cross sectional, descriptive, correlational design study to determine the relationship between engaging in parent-adolescent communication and use of positive coping in Korean AYAs, and the underlying mechanism. Data were collected from 144 AYAs aged 11-26, and their 73 parents, using a packet of self-administered questionnaires that included measures on sociodemographic and health history, parent-adolescent communication, family cohesion, hope, and uncertainty. The study obtained the needed institutional Review Board approvals from both Duke University and the Korean study site.

Results: From the first, qualitative descriptive design study with Korean adolescents with cancer and their parents, we developed the overarching core theme of “I cannot share my feelings” as a synthesis of three main themes that emerged: (1) restricted topics that I can share; (2) being closer but lacking depth; and (3) effects of restricted topics oncoping. Contrary to our expectation that participants would avoid communication related to the cancer diagnosis, they reported no challenges in communicating about treatment or day-to-day management routines; however, consistent with prior findings, they often experienced challenges in communicating about emotions due to a desire to protect one another. Furthermore, this family communication challenge resulted in creating serious risks for ineffective coping. Therefore, we conducted the next proposed study to determine the relationship between engaging in parent-adolescent communication and use of courageous coping. From this correlational, descriptive design study, we found a significant relationship between engaging in effective family communication and use of courageous coping (confrontive, optimistic, and supportant), regardless of AYA’s gender, age, cancer treatment status, and the level of symptom distress in both cases of mother and AYAs (0.26,p=0.0024, R2=0.07, medium effect), and a father and AYAs (0.25,p=0.0042, R2=0.06, medium effect). Next, we also revealed that the family cohesion was a significant mediator of the relationship between family communication and use of courageous coping in case of communicating with both a mother and a father. For example, the effect of communication with mother on use of courageous coping was reduced and no longer statistically significant, after controlling for family cohesion (Model 1, 0.11,p=0.2753, partial r2=0.01, very small effect). Last, this finding suggested that uncertainty directly influenced hope, and hope then fully mediated the impact of family cohesion on use of courageous coping among Korean AYAs with cancer when communicating with a mother. Whereas, hope only partially mediated the impact of family cohesion on the use of courageous coping among Korean AYAs when communicating with a father. Therefore, we revealed that uncertainty in illness and hope mediated the relationship between family cohesion and courageous coping in Korean AYAs with cancer.

Conclusion: Above all, in this dissertation study, we explored the Korean parent-adolescent communication experiences from the perspectives of Korean AYAs and their parents. The main finding from this study is that Korean adolescents with cancer and their parents struggle to share their emotional needs because of their fear related to the expected emotional harms and they hardly expect the benefits from engaging in family communication. The urgent needs to inform them of the benefits from engaging in family communication lead us to examine the relationship between engaging in parent-adolescent communication and use of courageous coping in the childhood cancer context. This study finding revealed the positive relationship between engaging in parent-adolescent communication and use of courageous coping among Korean AYAs and other mediating roles of family cohesion, uncertainty, and hope. This study highlighted the important role of family cohesion, decreased uncertainty, and increased hope in communicating with AYAs in the childhood cancer context to help their positive adjustment to cancer diagnosis by fostering their use of positive coping.

Implications: The current study helped us to be able to understand the family communication experiences of Korean AYAs and their parents in the childhood cancer context and provided directions to guide development of future family communication model and interventions. However, several limitations also exist and provide direction for future research. First, the future study need to employ a longitudinal design study to help clearer understanding of Korean family communication experiences and the relationship between engaging in family communication and use of courageous coping among Korean AYAs with cancer. Secondly, future study with bigger sample size are necessary. Finally, although this study was conducted targeting Korean AYAs living in Korea, the study findings will provide good implications to USA health care providers taking care of Korean AYAs, broadly other Asian AYAs from similar cultural backgrounds.

Traditionally seen as a time for increasing independence and autonomy, the college experience is often the first major, long-term physical separation from parents (Chickering, 1969; Chickering & Reisser, 1993). For previous generations, living away from home provided conditions for autonomy development partially based on infrequent contact with parents. In contrast, the rapid evolution of communication technology in the recent past allows today's generation of college students to connect to their parents instantly and frequently through a variety of electronic means including cellular phone calls, text messages, emails, video chats, and social media. The current study used self-report data from 180 residential college students at a mid-sized private institution in the southeastern United States to explore parent-child communication patterns as they relate to parenting styles and the development of emotional autonomy and adjustment to college. Emotional autonomy was measured with items from the Emotional Autonomy Scale (EAS; Steinberg & Silverberg, 1986). Following Beyers, Goossens, Van Calster, & Duriez (2005), a separation scale (derived from the EAS subscales of parental deidealization, nondependence on parents, and individuation) was used as a measure of emotional autonomy. Two scales from the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (Baker & Siryk, 1989) measured students' academic and social adjustment to college.

Results indicated that, in a given week, students reported an average contact frequency (with both parents combined) of 10.92 cell phone calls, 49.88 text messages, and 6.04 email exchanges. Contact was initiated by students and parents at roughly the same rates, and females had more contact with parents than males, in general. Facebook was more popular than Twitter and Instagram for connecting with parents through social media, and the majority of students felt either neutral or positive about being "Facebook friends" with their parents. Overall, students reported high satisfaction with both the frequency and the quality of communication with their parents. Greater levels of parental closeness significantly predicted higher satisfaction with the parent-child Facebook friendship.

The relationships between the traditional parenting styles of permissive, authoritative, and authoritarian parenting (Baumrind, 1991) were investigated in relation to communication patterns, autonomy, and adjustment. Helicopter parenting was also included as a predictor variable, though it is considered separate from the traditional parenting styles (Padilla-Walker & Nelson, 2012). Results of hierarchical regression analyses indicated that parents' higher scores on authoritarian parenting and helicopter parenting predicted more frequent cell phone contact with parents. Parental closeness also emerged as a significant, positive predictor of frequency of cell phone and total communication. Students who talked on their cell phones more frequently overall (not including parental contacts) tended to talk to their parents more often on the phone, and the same went for texting, as well.

Helicopter parenting also predicted lower emotional autonomy, which was in line with the only previous study of helicopter parenting in emerging adulthood (Padilla-Walker & Nelson, 2012). Surprisingly, authoritative and permissive parenting significantly predicted lower emotional autonomy, while authoritarian parenting was related to greater autonomy. Analyses investigating frequency of cell phone contact with parents as a moderator of this relationship indicated that more frequent phone conversations predicted decreased autonomy when parents were more authoritative. High levels of authoritarian parenting, on the other hand, resulted in higher levels of autonomy regardless of how often students talked on the phone with parents, while high contact with less authoritarian parents predicted decreased autonomy. Frequency of cell phone contact with parents was unrelated to academic and social adjustment to college. Findings are discussed in light of previous research and situated within a framework proposing that technological advances in communication have contributed to lengthening the path to adulthood.