Browsing by Subject "Peripheral Nerve Injuries"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access A simple technique for augmentation of axonal ingrowth into chondroitinase-treated acellular nerve grafts using nerve growth factor.(Annals of plastic surgery, 2012-05) Ovalle, Fernando; Patel, Ashit; Pollins, Alonda; de la Torre, Jorge; Vasconez, Luis; Hunt, Thomas R; Bucy, R Pat; Shack, R Bruce; Thayer, Wesley PBackground and purpose
Improvement in axonal regeneration may lead to the development of longer nerve grafts and improved outcomes for patients with peripheral nerve injury. Although the use of acellular nerve grafts has been well documented (Groves et al, Exp Neurol. 2005;195:278-292; Krekoski et al, J Neurosci. 2001;21:6206-6213; Massey et al, Exp Neurol. 2008;209:426-445; Neubauer et al, Exp Neurol. 2007;207:163-170; Zuo et al, Exp Neurol. 2002;176:221-228), less is known about the ability of neurotrophic factors to enhance axonal regeneration. This study evaluates axonal ingrowth augmentation using acellular, chondroitinase-treated nerve grafts doped with nerve growth factor (NGF).Methods
Acellular chondroitinase-treated murine nerve grafts were placed in experimental (NGF-treated grafts) and control (carrier-only grafts) rats. Five days after implantation, axonal regeneration was assessed by immunocytochemistry along with digital image analysis.Results
Higher axon count was observed throughout the length of the nerve in the NGF group (P < 0.0001), peaking at 3 mm from proximal repair (P = 0.02). Although the NGF group displayed a higher axon count per slice, the mean diameter of individual NGF axons was smaller (P < 0.0001), potentially consistent with induction of sensory axons (Rich et al, J Neurocytol. 1987;16:261-268; Sofroniew et al, Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1217-1128; Yip et al, J Neurosci. 1984;4:2986-2992).Conclusion
The simple technique of doping acellular, chondroitinase-treated nerve grafts with NGF can augment axonal ingrowth and possibly preferentially induce sensory axons.Item Open Access Utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in detecting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis.(The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2023-12) Iorio, Carlo; Koucheki, Robert; Strantzas, Samuel; Vandenberk, Michael; Lewis, Stephen J; Zeller, Reinhard; Camp, Mark; Rocos, Brett; Lebel, David EBackground context
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during surgical correction of spinal deformity has been shown to reduce iatrogenic injury in pediatric and adult populations. Although motor-evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG) have been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in detecting spinal cord and nerve root injuries, their utility in detecting motor and sensory nerve root injury in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains unknown.Purpose
We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of unimodal and multimodal IONM in the surgical management of HGS.Study design/setting
Retrospective cohort study.Patient sample
Pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for treatment of HGS.Outcome measures
Data on patient demographics, spinopelvic and spondylolisthesis parameters, and the presence of pre-and postoperative neurological deficits were collected.Methods
Intraoperative MEP, SSEP, and EMG alerts were recorded. Alert criteria were defined as a change in amplitude of more than 50% for MEP and/or SSEP, with or without change in latency, and more than 10 seconds of sustained EMG activity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each modality and the combination of MEP and SSEP. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.Results
Fifty-four pediatric patients with HGS undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2021 in a single tertiary center were included. Seventy-two percent (39/54) of patients were female; the average age of patients was 13.7±2.3 years. The sensitivity of MEP in detecting new postoperative neurologic deficit was 92.3% (95% CI [64.0-99.8]), SSEP 77.8% (95% CI [40.0-97.2]), EMG 69.2% (95% CI [38.6-90.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 100% (95% CI [73.5-100]). The specificity of MEP was 80.0% (95% CI [64.4-91.0]), SSEP 95.1% (95% CI [83.5-99.4]), EMG 65.9% (95% CI [49.4-79.9]), and combination MEP and SSEP 82.9% (95% CI [67.9-92.9]). The accuracy of SSEP was 92.0% (95% CI [80.8%-97.8%]), and the combination of MEP and SSEP was 86.8% (95% CI [74.7%-94.5%]). Twelve (22.2%) patients had a new motor or sensory deficit diagnosed immediately postoperatively. Nine patients made a full recovery, and 3 had some neurologic deficit on final follow-up.Conclusion
Unimodal IONM using SSEP and MEP alone were accurate in diagnosing sensory and motor nerve root injuries, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in predicting motor and sensory nerve injuries in pediatric HGS improved further with the use of multimodal IONM (combining MEP and SEP). We recommend the utilization of multimodal IONM in all HGS PSF surgeries.