Browsing by Subject "Redistribution"
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Context and Preference Formation: The Social and Political Origins of Support for Redistribution(2012) Freeze, KentWhen do individuals feel that economic inequality needs to be corrected through redistributive government policy, such as progressive taxes or social spending? Using a cross-national data set of public opinion across both developing and developed countries, this dissertation finds that political context plays a key role in determining how individuals view economic inequality and their support for redistributive social policy. An overarching theme throughout the dissertation is that political elites are key in making inequality a prominent issue for the public. This is done by framing individual attributes such as income, ethnic identity or geographic local (urban vs. rural) in a way that will either maximize or minimize support for redistribution. When political elites lack incentives to mobilize public opinion on the issue, it becomes unlikely that individual attributes such as income or ethnicity will predict support for redistribution.
Item Open Access Models of Other-Regarding Preferences and Redistribution(2017-11-16) Dimick, M; Rueda, D; Stegmueller, DItem Open Access Non-Taxation and Representation: an Essay on Distribution, Redistribution, and Regime Stability in the Modern World(2007-12-17) Morrison, Kevin McDonaldDrawing upon formal modeling, cross-national statistical analysis, and in-depth case studies, this dissertation explores the relationship between patterns of government revenue generation and political regime stability. Considering both tax and non-tax revenue (the latter of which includes foreign aid and revenue from state-owned natural resource enterprises), and building on recent redistributive theories of regime change, I use formal modeling to generate testable hypotheses about the impact of non-tax revenue on regime dynamics in both democratic and authoritarian regimes. The central prediction is that rises (falls) in non-tax resources increase (decrease) the stability of authoritarian and democratic regimes, by reducing (increasing) redistributional conflicts in society. I provide evidence supporting the implications of the theory for both redistribution and regime stability, drawing upon cross-national time-series statistical analysis as well as in-depth examination of three theoretically important cases: Bolivia, Mexico, and Kenya.The research has important implications for three bodies of literature. First, it advances the broad literature on the political economy of redistribution. The existing literature has generally assumed that government revenues are raised solely by taxation, the source of redistributional conflict. I demonstrate that this is not a plausible assumption---non-tax revenue makes up about a quarter of government revenue on average, and in some countries represents the large majority of government revenue---and that in fact non-tax revenue systematically decreases redistribution.Second, building on this insight, I advance the literature on democratization by developing a theory of how government revenues---both their size and their source---factor into regime change. This work builds on and extends recent influential works that have focused on formally modeling the distributional dynamics underlying regime transitions. Finally, the research sheds light on commonalities between literatures studying different areas of the world. In particular, it argues that there are similarities between insights developed in the literature on the "rentier" state---principally regarding how oil revenues affect regime dynamics---and those developed in the literature on foreign aid and political regimes. The reason is that oil revenues and aid are significant examples of a broader set of resources---non-tax revenues---whose importance has been underappreciated.Item Open Access Philanthropy as Redistribution: A Geographic Analysis of Domestic Foundation Giving(2018-01-17) Englar, BrianPrivate foundations, and philanthropy more broadly, have long been critical players in the American civic sector. By seeking out and funding projects otherwise left behind by the public and private sectors, these grantmakers hold significant power to influence societal outcomes and sometimes even policy. As a result of the most recent election – with both the Clinton Foundation and Donald J. Trump Foundation receiving heated criticism – American foundations have begun to receive a much more critical spotlight. This newfound criticism of private philanthropy represents a prime opportunity to reexamine the private foundation’s effects on American communities. In this study, I employ an original dataset for a sample of fifty US counties as I examine two crucial aspects of foundation operations: the private foundation’s often-assumed redistributive function and the private foundation’s role in providing funds to rural nonprofits. First, I find little in the way of redistributive trends in grants made to my sample counties. My sample dataset lacks evidence for a significant relationship between community need and private foundation grant receipts in the direction redistributive theory would predict. Second, I find no significant difference between the population-adjusted size of the nonprofit sectors in my rural and urban counties and a difference in per-capita grant receipts between the two county types that approaches significance at the five percent level. Combined, these findings suggest private foundations are failing to target their grants to the communities most in need and to proportionately fund projects in rural communities.Item Open Access The Altruistic Rich? Inequality and Other-Regarding Preferences for Redistribution(QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016) Dimick, Matthew; Rueda, David; Stegmueller, DanielItem Open Access The Persistent Effect of Language on Preference for Income Redistribution: Evidence from a Natural Experiment(2018) Fu, JiaweiIs there any long-term factor that shapes individual preference for income redistribution and corresponding economic or political behavior? I document the persistent effect of language structure, specifically word order freedom (WoF), on preference for redistribution. WoF refers to the extent to which word order can be changed without affecting the original meaning. In this article, I develop two formal models to show how languages with more flexibility in word order foster a consciousness of equality and encourage people to be more risk-averse. Empirically, using two general social surveys, I find that people speaking a language with greater WoF are more likely to purchase insurance and support to reduce the income gap. Furthermore, I investigate a natural experiment traced back to the Viking age. By using Scandinavian settlements as an instrumental variable, I reveal the causal relationship between language and the variation of human political attitudes and behaviors.