Browsing by Subject "School Health Services"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A School-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing Program: Testing Uptake and Quarantine Length After In-School Exposures.
    (Pediatrics, 2022-02) Boutzoukas, Angelique E; Zimmerman, Kanecia O; Mann, Tara K; Moorthy, Ganga S; Blakemore, Ashley; McGann, Kathleen A; Smith, Michael J; Nutting, Boen; Kerley, Karen; Brookhart, M Alan; Edwards, Laura; Rak, Zsolt; Benjamin, Daniel K; Kalu, Ibukunoluwa C

    Objectives

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related quarantines, which are required after close contact with infected individuals, have substantially disrupted in-person education for kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) students. In recent recommendations, shortened durations of quarantine are allowed if a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result is obtained at 5 to 7 days postexposure, but access to testing remains limited. We hypothesized that providing access to in-school SARS-CoV-2 testing postexposure would increase testing and reduce missed school days.

    Methods

    This prospective cohort study was conducted in one large public K-12 school district in North Carolina and included 2 periods: preimplementation (March 15, 2021, to April 21, 2021) and postimplementation (April 22, 2021, to June 4, 2021), defined around initiation of an in-school SARS-CoV-2 testing program in which on-site access to testing is provided. Number of quarantined students and staff, testing uptake, test results, and number of missed school days were analyzed and compared between the preimplementation and postimplementation periods.

    Results

    Twenty-four schools, including 12 251 in-person learners, participated in the study. During preimplementation, 446 close contacts were quarantined for school-related exposures; 708 close contacts were quarantined postimplementation. Testing uptake after school-related exposures increased from 6% to 40% (95% confidence interval: 23% to 45%) after implementation, and 89% of tests were conducted in-school. After in-school testing implementation, close contacts missed ∼1.5 fewer days of school (95% confidence interval: -2 to -1).

    Conclusions

    Providing access to in-school testing may be a worthwhile mechanism to increase testing uptake after in-school exposures and minimize missed days of in-person learning, thereby mitigating the pandemic's ongoing impact on children.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Is implementation fidelity associated with improved access to care in a school-based Child and Family Team model?
    (Eval Program Plann, 2015-04) Gifford, Elizabeth J; Wells, Rebecca S; Bai, Yu; Malone, Patrick S
    Effective child and family centered service planning is crucial to addressing vulnerable children's needs. However, there is limited evidence about what facets of these processes improve service use and outcomes. The current study used a Poisson random effects hazard model to test correlations between fidelity to NC's Child and Family Support Team model and time to service receipt, using case management data for 3396 children served by that program during the 2008-2009 school year. Students were more likely to receive recommended services more quickly when caregivers and the students attended planning meetings, when their plans included services for caregivers, and when child and family team leaders followed up after meetings to verify service receipt. Contrary to the Child and Family Support Team theory of change, match between student needs and the lead agency of the meeting was not associated with the odds of quicker service receipt, nor was attendance by natural supports. Findings from this study demonstrate the potential effectiveness of using case management systems to measure service planning process fidelity, as well as how results thereof can both inform process improvement and potential refinements to models' theories of change.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Pairing nurses and social workers in schools: North Carolina's school-based Child and Family Support Teams.
    (J Sch Health, 2010-02) Gifford, EJ; Wells, RS; Miller, S; Troop, TO; Bai, Y; Babinski, L