Browsing by Subject "Stakeholder Participation"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Applied Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Contextually Appropriate Intervention and Increase the Likelihood of Uptake.
    (Medical care, 2021-06) Lewinski, Allison A; Crowley, Matthew J; Miller, Christopher; Bosworth, Hayden B; Jackson, George L; Steinhauser, Karen; White-Clark, Courtney; McCant, Felicia; Zullig, Leah L

    Background

    Rapid approaches to collecting and analyzing qualitative interview data can accelerate discovery timelines and intervention development while maintaining scientific rigor. We describe the application of these methods to a program designed to improve care coordination between the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and community providers.

    Methods

    Care coordination between VHA and community providers can be challenging in rural areas. The Telehealth-based Coordination of Non-VHA Care (TECNO Care) intervention was designed to improve care coordination among VHA and community providers. To ensure contextually appropriate implementation of TECNO Care, we conducted preimplementation interviews with veterans, VHA administrators, and VHA and community providers involved in community care. Using both a rapid approach and qualitative analysis, an interviewer and 1-2 note-taker(s) conducted interviews.

    Results

    Over 5 months, 18 stakeholders were interviewed and we analyzed these data to identify how best to deliver TECNO Care. Responses relevant to improving care coordination include health system characteristics; target population; metrics and outcomes; challenges with the current system; and core components. Veterans who frequently visit VHA or community providers and are referred for additional services are at risk for poor outcomes and may benefit from additional care coordination. Using these data, we designed TECNO Care to include information on VHA services and processes, assist in the timely completion of referrals, and facilitate record sharing.

    Conclusion

    Rapid qualitative analysis can inform near real-time intervention development and ensure relevant content creation while setting the stage for stakeholder buy-in. Rigorous and timely analyses support the delivery of contextually appropriate, efficient, high-value patient care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Developing Treatment Guidelines During a Pandemic Health Crisis: Lessons Learned From COVID-19.
    (Annals of internal medicine, 2021-08) Kuriakose, Safia; Singh, Kanal; Pau, Alice K; Daar, Eric; Gandhi, Rajesh; Tebas, Pablo; Evans, Laura; Gulick, Roy M; Lane, H Clifford; Masur, Henry; NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel; Aberg, Judith A; Adimora, Adaora A; Baker, Jason; Kreuziger, Lisa Baumann; Bedimo, Roger; Belperio, Pamela S; Cantrill, Stephen V; Coopersmith, Craig M; Davis, Susan L; Dzierba, Amy L; Gallagher, John J; Glidden, David V; Grund, Birgit; Hardy, Erica J; Hinkson, Carl; Hughes, Brenna L; Johnson, Steven; Keller, Marla J; Kim, Arthur Y; Lennox, Jeffrey L; Levy, Mitchell M; Li, Jonathan Z; Martin, Greg S; Naggie, Susanna; Pavia, Andrew T; Seam, Nitin; Simpson, Steven Q; Swindells, Susan; Tien, Phyllis; Waghmare, Alpana A; Wilson, Kevin C; Yazdany, Jinoos; Zachariah, Philip; Campbell, Danielle M; Harrison, Carly; Burgess, Timothy; Francis, Joseph; Sheikh, Virginia; Uyeki, Timothy M; Walker, Robert; Brooks, John T; Ortiz, Laura Bosque; Davey, Richard T; Doepel, Laurie K; Eisinger, Robert W; Han, Alison; Higgs, Elizabeth S; Nason, Martha C; Crew, Page; Lerner, Andrea M; Lund, Claire; Worthington, Christopher
    The development of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines began in March 2020 in response to a request from the White House Coronavirus Task Force. Within 4 days of the request, the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel was established and the first meeting took place (virtually-as did subsequent meetings). The Panel comprises 57 individuals representing 6 governmental agencies, 11 professional societies, and 33 medical centers, plus 2 community members, who have worked together to create and frequently update the guidelines on the basis of evidence from the most recent clinical studies available. The initial version of the guidelines was completed within 2 weeks and posted online on 21 April 2020. Initially, sparse evidence was available to guide COVID-19 treatment recommendations. However, treatment data rapidly accrued based on results from clinical studies that used various study designs and evaluated different therapeutic agents and approaches. Data have continued to evolve at a rapid pace, leading to 24 revisions and updates of the guidelines in the first year. This process has provided important lessons for responding to an unprecedented public health emergency: Providers and stakeholders are eager to access credible, current treatment guidelines; governmental agencies, professional societies, and health care leaders can work together effectively and expeditiously; panelists from various disciplines, including biostatistics, are important for quickly developing well-informed recommendations; well-powered randomized clinical trials continue to provide the most compelling evidence to guide treatment recommendations; treatment recommendations need to be developed in a confidential setting free from external pressures; development of a user-friendly, web-based format for communicating with health care providers requires substantial administrative support; and frequent updates are necessary as clinical evidence rapidly emerges.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Use of a human-centered design approach to adapt a nurse-led cardiovascular disease prevention intervention in HIV clinics.
    (Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 2020-03) Aifah, Angela; Okeke, Nwora Lance; Rentrope, Cynthia R; Schexnayder, Julie; Bloomfield, Gerald S; Bosworth, Hayden; Grover, Kiran; Hileman, Corrilynn O; Muiruri, Charles; Oakes, Megan; Webel, Allison R; Longenecker, Chris T; Vedanthan, Rajesh
    Stakeholder-informed strategies addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden among people living with HIV (PWH) are needed within healthcare settings. This study provides an assessment of how human-centered design (HCD) guided the adaptation of a nurse-led intervention to reduce CVD risk among PWH. Using a HCD approach, research staff guided two multidisciplinary "design teams" in Ohio and North Carolina, with each having five HCD meetings. We conducted acceptability and feasibility testing. Six core recommendations were produced by two design teams of key stakeholders and further developed after the acceptability and feasibility testing to produce a final list of 14 actionable areas of adaptation. Acceptability and feasibility testing revealed areas for adaptation, e.g. patient preferences for communication and the benefit of additional staff to support patient follow-up. In conclusion, along with acceptability and feasibility testing, HCD led to the production of 14 key recommendations to enhance the effectiveness and scalability of an integrated HIV/CVD intervention.