Browsing by Subject "Standards"
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Material Weakness Discovery Lag and Misstatement Risk in a Constrained Control Testing Environment(2017) Calvin, Christopher GorhamIn this study, I explore whether archival evidence is consistent with auditors conforming to auditing standards when discovering and responding to internal control weaknesses, and whether conforming has adverse consequences for financial misstatement risk. My study is motivated by two sources: The first is Public Company Accounting Oversight Board member Jeanette Franzel, who in 2015 tasked academics with exploring whether all material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting are being properly discovered and disclosed by auditors, as trends in financial misstatement and internal control opinion data suggested otherwise. The second is prior research which suggests that auditors fail to discover most material weaknesses in internal controls; and when auditors do discover a material weakness in internal controls, they often fail to sufficiently adjust their audit procedures over financial statement assertions to negate the misstatement risk resulting from the discovered weakness. An inference from this research is that auditors do not behave in accordance with auditing standards with respect to the discovery of and response to material control weaknesses.
I propose and infer from my findings that the combined effect of auditor time constraints, auditor resource constraints, and auditing standards that require the auditor to exercise professional judgment regarding whether and how to perform unplanned control testing procedures leads to a temporal lag in auditors’ discovery of material weaknesses in internal controls, and that the discovery lag results in increased financial misstatement risk. While my results are consistent with auditors failing to discover most material weaknesses in the first year of existence, they also suggest that the discovery failure may be a joint result of auditors following auditing standards while also being constrained by the environment in which they operate.
Item Open Access Standardizing Sustainability for Private Water Companies: Existing Standards and Future Opportunities(2017-04-28) Oh, Eunji; Waller, Vanessa; Zhou, MavisUnlike public utilities, private water companies are in the unique position of having access to financial resources beyond municipal funding, allowing them to pursue innovative solutions to complex water management problems. However, private water companies must work creatively within the confines of regulations as well as stakeholder and shareholder expectations. Private water companies, like all other businesses, are faced with the question of how much time and resources to put toward environmental concerns. In most businesses, this question is addressed by operationalizing the concept of “sustainability.” Many in the business community think of sustainability in terms of the “triple bottom line”— the synergy of environmental, social/societal, and financial obligations. This project takes an inside look at how private water companies—from the very large to the very small—utilize the concept of “sustainability” in their business operations. As we found after speaking with water utility managers from across the United States, sustainability is often perceived as such a sweeping, theoretical concept, that it can be difficult to figure out how to “use” sustainability in practice. However, we also found that many tangible opportunities exist to make utility operations more sustainable. In fact, most utilities are well aware of, and eager to embrace, the challenges presented by the goal of becoming a more sustainable company. In almost every business avenue, including financial management, operations, and even human resources, private water companies are searching for ways to improve their triple bottom line, even while confined by regulations and shareholder commitments. Sustainability standards—guidance documents designed to make sustainability practical for companies—have played a key role in allowing businesses to measure and market their progress. Some of these documents specifically address sustainability for water utilities. But are these standards actually doing their job? Or are they a deterrent, making sustainability seem impractical? Our task was to evaluate these questions and develop recommendations for an improved sustainability standard for private water companies. We accomplished this goal through phone interviews with utility managers and company executives, as well as literature review. We found that an improved standard must have four major components: 1) a clear definition of what “sustainability” means, in terms that are useful for water utility operations; 2) references to established business standards, thereby linking a water utility-specific standard to a broader business context; 3) a recognition that a variety of factors influence operations, and that utilities must tailor sustainability goals to local issues; and 4) an emphasis on applying technology to enable efficient benchmarking for sustainability goals. Standards are inherently limited in their ability to effect change, simply because each business has its own unique needs and challenges. However, improvement to existing standards is particularly timely, as technological innovation in the water industry, including smart metering and data analytics, is moving at a rapid pace. A water utility sustainability standard for the future has the potential to simplify and organize important goals in this evolving industry. It is primarily this ability—to simplify the lives of utility managers—that would make a new sustainability standard useful.Item Open Access The ocean sampling day consortium.(Gigascience, 2015) Kopf, Anna; Bicak, Mesude; Kottmann, Renzo; Schnetzer, Julia; Kostadinov, Ivaylo; Lehmann, Katja; Fernandez-Guerra, Antonio; Jeanthon, Christian; Rahav, Eyal; Ullrich, Matthias; Wichels, Antje; Gerdts, Gunnar; Polymenakou, Paraskevi; Kotoulas, Giorgos; Siam, Rania; Abdallah, Rehab Z; Sonnenschein, Eva C; Cariou, Thierry; O'Gara, Fergal; Jackson, Stephen; Orlic, Sandi; Steinke, Michael; Busch, Julia; Duarte, Bernardo; Caçador, Isabel; Canning-Clode, João; Bobrova, Oleksandra; Marteinsson, Viggo; Reynisson, Eyjolfur; Loureiro, Clara Magalhães; Luna, Gian Marco; Quero, Grazia Marina; Löscher, Carolin R; Kremp, Anke; DeLorenzo, Marie E; Øvreås, Lise; Tolman, Jennifer; LaRoche, Julie; Penna, Antonella; Frischer, Marc; Davis, Timothy; Katherine, Barker; Meyer, Christopher P; Ramos, Sandra; Magalhães, Catarina; Jude-Lemeilleur, Florence; Aguirre-Macedo, Ma Leopoldina; Wang, Shiao; Poulton, Nicole; Jones, Scott; Collin, Rachel; Fuhrman, Jed A; Conan, Pascal; Alonso, Cecilia; Stambler, Noga; Goodwin, Kelly; Yakimov, Michael M; Baltar, Federico; Bodrossy, Levente; Van De Kamp, Jodie; Frampton, Dion Mf; Ostrowski, Martin; Van Ruth, Paul; Malthouse, Paul; Claus, Simon; Deneudt, Klaas; Mortelmans, Jonas; Pitois, Sophie; Wallom, David; Salter, Ian; Costa, Rodrigo; Schroeder, Declan C; Kandil, Mahrous M; Amaral, Valentina; Biancalana, Florencia; Santana, Rafael; Pedrotti, Maria Luiza; Yoshida, Takashi; Ogata, Hiroyuki; Ingleton, Tim; Munnik, Kate; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara; Berteaux-Lecellier, Veronique; Wecker, Patricia; Cancio, Ibon; Vaulot, Daniel; Bienhold, Christina; Ghazal, Hassan; Chaouni, Bouchra; Essayeh, Soumya; Ettamimi, Sara; Zaid, El Houcine; Boukhatem, Noureddine; Bouali, Abderrahim; Chahboune, Rajaa; Barrijal, Said; Timinouni, Mohammed; El Otmani, Fatima; Bennani, Mohamed; Mea, Marianna; Todorova, Nadezhda; Karamfilov, Ventzislav; Ten Hoopen, Petra; Cochrane, Guy; L'Haridon, Stephane; Bizsel, Kemal Can; Vezzi, Alessandro; Lauro, Federico M; Martin, Patrick; Jensen, Rachelle M; Hinks, Jamie; Gebbels, Susan; Rosselli, Riccardo; De Pascale, Fabio; Schiavon, Riccardo; Dos Santos, Antonina; Villar, Emilie; Pesant, Stéphane; Cataletto, Bruno; Malfatti, Francesca; Edirisinghe, Ranjith; Silveira, Jorge A Herrera; Barbier, Michele; Turk, Valentina; Tinta, Tinkara; Fuller, Wayne J; Salihoglu, Ilkay; Serakinci, Nedime; Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez; Bresnan, Eileen; Iriberri, Juan; Nyhus, Paul Anders Fronth; Bente, Edvardsen; Karlsen, Hans Erik; Golyshin, Peter N; Gasol, Josep M; Moncheva, Snejana; Dzhembekova, Nina; Johnson, Zackary; Sinigalliano, Christopher David; Gidley, Maribeth Louise; Zingone, Adriana; Danovaro, Roberto; Tsiamis, George; Clark, Melody S; Costa, Ana Cristina; El Bour, Monia; Martins, Ana M; Collins, R Eric; Ducluzeau, Anne-Lise; Martinez, Jonathan; Costello, Mark J; Amaral-Zettler, Linda A; Gilbert, Jack A; Davies, Neil; Field, Dawn; Glöckner, Frank OliverOcean Sampling Day was initiated by the EU-funded Micro B3 (Marine Microbial Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Biotechnology) project to obtain a snapshot of the marine microbial biodiversity and function of the world's oceans. It is a simultaneous global mega-sequencing campaign aiming to generate the largest standardized microbial data set in a single day. This will be achievable only through the coordinated efforts of an Ocean Sampling Day Consortium, supportive partnerships and networks between sites. This commentary outlines the establishment, function and aims of the Consortium and describes our vision for a sustainable study of marine microbial communities and their embedded functional traits.