Browsing by Subject "Thrombectomy"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Mechanical thrombectomy for perioperative ischemic stroke following elective inpatient surgery in the United States.
    (Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2022-05-13) Shah, Shreyansh; Hatfield, Jordan; Fuller, Matthew; Ohnuma, Tetsu; Luke James, Michael; Bartz, Raquel R; Raghunathan, Karthik; Komisarow, Jordan; Krishnamoorthy, Vijay
    Perioperative ischemic stroke significantly increases morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective surgery. Mechanical thrombectomy can improve ischemic stroke outcomes, but frequency and trend of its utilization for treatment of perioperative ischemic stroke is not studied. We identified adults who underwent elective inpatient surgery from 2008 to 2018 and suffered from a perioperative ischemic stroke from the Premier Healthcare Database. The difference in mechanical thrombectomy usage before and after the updated recommendation inacute stroke guidelines was assessed in a univariate analysis using a chi-squared test. A segmented regression model was created to assess the change in rate over time.Of 6,349,668 patients with elective inpatient surgery, 12,507 (0.2%) had perioperative ischemic stroke. Mean age (and standard deviation) was 69.5 (11.7) years, and 48.8% were female. Mechanical thrombectomy was used in 1.7% patients and its use increased from 0.0% in 3rd quarter, 2008 to 4.4% in 4th quarter, 2018. Significant increase in the use of mechanical thrombectomy was seen after 3rd quarter, 2015 when its use was incorporated in acute stroke treatment guideline (1.14% before 3rd quarter, 2015 versus 3.07% after; p < 0.0001). Amongst patients with perioperative ischemic stroke, patients who received mechanical thrombectomy were more likely to have their surgery performed at a teaching institute (67.3% versus 53.9%). Although a significant increase in rates of utilization of mechanical thrombectomy was observed, rates of utilization remain low, especially in non-teaching hospitals. This highlights improvements in the management of perioperative ischemic strokes and further opportunities to improve outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Outcomes After Endovascular Thrombectomy With or Without Alteplase in Routine Clinical Practice.
    (JAMA neurology, 2022-08) Smith, Eric E; Zerna, Charlotte; Solomon, Nicole; Matsouaka, Roland; Mac Grory, Brian; Saver, Jeffrey L; Hill, Michael D; Fonarow, Gregg C; Schwamm, Lee H; Messé, Steven R; Xian, Ying

    Importance

    The effectiveness and safety of intravenous alteplase given before or concurrently with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is uncertain. Randomized clinical trials suggest there is little difference in outcomes but with only modest precision and insufficient power to analyze uncommon outcomes including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

    Objective

    To determine whether 8 prespecified outcomes are different in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in routine clinical practice with EVT with alteplase compared with patients treated with EVT alone without alteplase. It was hypothesized that alteplase would be associated with higher risk of sICH.

    Design, setting, and participants

    This was an observational cohort study conducted from February 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020, that included adult patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with EVT within 6 hours of time last known well, after excluding patients without information on discharge destination and patients with in-hospital stroke. Participants were recruited from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, a large nationwide registry of patients with acute ischemic stroke from 555 hospitals in the US.

    Exposures

    Intravenous alteplase or no alteplase.

    Main outcomes and measures

    Prespecified outcomes were discharge destination, independent ambulation at discharge, modified Rankin score at discharge, discharge mortality, cerebral reperfusion according to modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade, and sICH.

    Results

    There were 15 832 patients treated with EVT (median [IQR] age, 72.0 [61.0-82.0] years; 7932 women [50.1%]); 10 548 (66.7%) received alteplase and 5284 (33.4%) did not. Patients treated with alteplase were younger, arrived via Emergency Medical Services sooner, were less likely to have certain comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and diabetes, but had similar National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity (NIHSS) scores. Compared with patients who did not receive alteplase treatment, patients treated with alteplase were less likely to die (11.1% [1173 of 10 548 patients] vs 13.9% [734 of 5284 patients]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; P < .001), more likely to have no major disability based on modified Rankin scale of 2 or less at discharge (28.5% [2415 of 8490 patients] vs 20.7% [894 of 4322 patients]; aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.28-1.45; P < .001), and to have better reperfusion based on modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b or greater (90.9% [8474 of 9318 patients] vs 88.0% [4140 of 4705 patients]; aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.28-1.50; P < .001). However, alteplase treatment was associated with higher risk of sICH (6.5% [685 of 10 530 patients] vs 5.3% [279 of 5249 patients]; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.42; P < .001).

    Conclusions and relevance

    In this observational cohort study of patients treated with EVT, intravenous alteplase treatment was associated with better in-hospital survival and functional outcomes but higher sICH risk after adjusting for other covariates.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Shorter Door-to-Needle Times Are Associated With Better Outcomes After Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy and Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.
    (Circulation, 2023-07) Man, Shumei; Solomon, Nicole; Mac Grory, Brian; Alhanti, Brooke; Uchino, Ken; Saver, Jeffrey L; Smith, Eric E; Xian, Ying; Bhatt, Deepak L; Schwamm, Lee H; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam; Fonarow, Gregg C

    Background

    Existing data and clinical trials could not determine whether faster intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) translates into better long-term functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke among those treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Patient-level national data can provide the required large population to study the associations between earlier IVT, versus later, with longitudinal functional outcomes and mortality in patients receiving IVT+EVT combined treatment.

    Methods

    This cohort study included older US patients (age ≥65 years) who received IVT within 4.5 hours or EVT within 7 hours after acute ischemic stroke using the linked 2015 to 2018 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke and Medicare database (38 913 treated with IVT only and 3946 with IVT+EVT). Primary outcome was home time, a patient-prioritized functional outcome. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality in 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between door-to-needle (DTN) times and outcomes.

    Results

    Among patients treated with IVT+EVT, after adjusting for patient and hospital factors, including onset-to-EVT times, each 15-minute increase in DTN times for IVT was associated with significantly higher odds of zero home time in a year (never discharged to home) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.19]), less home time among those discharged to home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 per 1% of 365 days [95% CI, 0.89-0.98]), and higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]). These associations were also statistically significant among patients treated with IVT but at a modest degree (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 for zero home time, 0.96 per 1% home time for those discharged to home, and adjusted hazard ratio 1.03 for mortality). In the secondary analysis where the IVT+EVT group was compared with 3704 patients treated with EVT only, shorter DTN times (≤60, 45, and 30 minutes) achieved incrementally more home time in a year, and more modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at discharge (22.3%, 23.4%, and 25.0%, respectively) versus EVT only (16.4%, P<0.001 for each). The benefit dissipated with DTN>60 minutes.

    Conclusions

    Among older patients with stroke treated with either IVT only or IVT+EVT, shorter DTN times are associated with better long-term functional outcomes and lower mortality. These findings support further efforts to accelerate thrombolytic administration in all eligible patients, including EVT candidates.