Browsing by Subject "Tobacco Use Cessation Devices"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Adherence to Pharmacological Smoking Cessation Interventions: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Correlates and Barriers.
    (Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2018-09) Pacek, Lauren R; McClernon, F Joseph; Bosworth, Hayden B

    Introduction

    Efficacious pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation are available, but poor adherence to these treatments may limit these interventions overall impact. To improve adherence to smoking cessation interventions, it is first necessary to identify and understand smoker-level characteristics that drive nonadherence (ie, nonconformance with a provider's recommendation of timing, dosage, or frequency of medication-taking during the prescribed length of time).

    Methods

    We present a literature review of studies examining correlates of, or self-reported reasons for, nonadherence to smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. Studies were identified through PubMed-using MeSH terms, Embase-using Emtree terms, and ISI Web of Science.

    Results and conclusions

    This literature review included 50 studies that examined nonpreventable (eg, sociodemographics) and preventable (eg, forgetfulness) factors associated with adherence to smoking cessation medication and suggestions for overcoming some of the identified barriers. Systematic study of this topic would be facilitated by consistent reporting of adherence and correlates thereof in the literature, development of consistent definitions of medication adherence across studies, utilization of more objective measures of adherence (eg, blood plasma levels vs. self-report) in addition to reliance on self-reported adherence.

    Implications

    This article provides the most comprehensive review to date on correlates of adherence to pharmacological smoking cessation interventions. Challenges and specific gaps in the literature that should be a priority for future research are discussed. Future priorities include additional research, particularly among vulnerable populations of smokers, developing standardized definitions of adherence and methods for measuring adherence, regular assessment of cessation pharmacotherapy adherence in the context of research and clinical practice, and development of novel treatments aimed at preventable barriers to medication adherence.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Assessing the evidence on the differential impact of menthol versus non-menthol cigarette use on smoking cessation in the U.S. population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    (Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2021-08) Kim, Mimi M; Kim, Mimi M; Curtin, Geoffrey M

    Background

    The potential impact of menthol versus non-menthol cigarette use on smoking behaviors is an intensely scrutinized topic in the public health arena. To date, several general literature reviews have been conducted, but findings and conclusions have been discordant. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines to examine the Key Question, "Does menthol cigarette use have a differential impact on smoking cessation compared with non-menthol cigarette use?"

    Methods

    Six databases-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo-were queried from inception to June 12, 2020. Articles comparing menthol versus non-menthol cigarette smokers in terms of at least one predefined smoking cessation outcome were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Center approach. A random-effects model utilizing the DerSimonian and Laird method to pool adjusted odds ratio was applied. Variations among pooled studies were assessed using Cochran's Q statistic, and heterogeneity was quantified using the inconsistency index (I2).

    Results

    Forty-three demographically adjusted studies (22 rated "good", 20 rated "fair", and one study rated "poor" individual study quality) comparing menthol and non-menthol smokers were qualitatively synthesized across the following measures (study count; strength of evidence): duration of abstinence (2; low); quit attempts (15; insufficient); rate of abstinence/quitting (29; moderate); change in smoking quantity/frequency (5; insufficient); and, return to smoking/relapse (2; insufficient). Overall, the qualitative synthesis failed to show a consistent trend for an association between menthol cigarette use and smoking cessation across outcomes. Meta-analyses found no difference between menthol and non-menthol cigarette use and either quit attempts or abstinence.

    Conclusions

    Given the lack of consistency or statistical significance in the findings-combined with a "low" overall strength of evidence grade, based on deficiencies of indirectness and inconsistency-no consistent or significant associations between menthol cigarette use and smoking cessation were identified. Recommendations for future studies include increased focus on providing longitudinal, adjusted data collected from standardized outcome measures of cessation to better inform long-term smoking cessation and menthol cigarette use. Such improvements should also be further considered in more methodologically rigorous systematic reviews characterized by objectivity, comprehensiveness, and transparency with the ultimate objective of better informing public health and policy decision making.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Experiences With Smoking Cessation Attempts and Prior Use of Cessation Aids in Smokers With HIV: Findings From a Focus Group Study Conducted in Durham, North Carolina.
    (AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 2021-04) Pacek, Lauren R; Holloway, Alicia D; Cropsey, Karen L; Meade, Christina S; Sweitzer, Maggie M; Davis, James M; Joseph McClernon, F
    Cigarette smoking remains disproportionately prevalent and is increasingly a cause of death and disability among people with HIV (PWH). Many PWH are interested in quitting, but interest in and uptake of first-line smoking cessation pharmacotherapies are varied in this population. To provide current data regarding experiences with and perceptions of smoking cessation and cessation aids among PWH living in Durham, North Carolina, the authors conducted five focus group interviews (total n = 24; 96% African American) using semistructured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. Major themes included ambivalence and/or lack of interest in cessation; presence of cessation barriers; perceived perceptions of ineffectiveness of cessation aids; perceived medication side effects; and conflation of the harms resulting from use of tobacco products and nicotine replacement therapy. Innovative and effective interventions must account for the aforementioned multiple barriers to cessation as well as prior experiences with and misperceptions regarding cessation aids.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Randomized controlled trial testing a video-text tobacco cessation intervention among economically disadvantaged African American adults.
    (Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2021-11) Webb Hooper, Monica; Miller, David B; Saldivar, Enrique; Mitchell, Charlene; Johnson, Lacresha; Burns, Marilyn; Huang, Ming-Chun

    Objective

    This pilot study tested the acceptability and short-term outcomes of a culturally specific mobile health (mHealth) intervention (Path2Quit) in a sample of economically disadvantaged African American adults. We hypothesized that Path2Quit would demonstrate greater acceptability, biochemically verified abstinence, and promote nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use compared with a standard text-messaging program.

    Method

    In a 2-arm pilot randomized trial, adults who sought to quit smoking (N = 119) received either Path2Quit or the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) SmokefreeTXT, both combined with a brief behavioral counseling session plus 2 weeks of NRT. Outcomes included acceptability (intervention evaluation and use), NRT utilization, 24-hr quit attempts, self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (ppa), and biochemically verified smoking abstinence at the 6-week follow-up.

    Results

    Participants were 52% female/48% male, mostly single (60%), completed ≥ 12 years of education (83%), middle-aged, and 63% reported a household income < $10K/year. Participants smoked 11 (SD = 8.2) cigarettes/day for 25 (SD = 16) years, and reported low nicotine dependence. There were no differences in intervention evaluations or use (ps > .05), yet Path2Quit led to significantly greater NRT utilization at follow-up (p < .05). There was no difference in quit attempts between conditions or 7-day ppa (p > .05). However, Path2Quit resulted in significantly greater carbon monoxide confirmed ppa (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.55; 95% CI [1.32, 9.54]) at the 6-week follow-up.

    Conclusions

    A culturally specific mHealth intervention demonstrated positive effects on NRT use and short-term abstinence. Additional research in a larger sample and with long-term follow-up is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).