Browsing by Subject "and the International Spine Study Group"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Defining a Surgical Invasiveness Threshold for Increased Risk of a Major Complication Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.(Spine, 2021-07) Neuman, Brian J; Harris, Andrew B; Klineberg, Eric O; Hostin, Richard A; Protopsaltis, Themistocles S; Passias, Peter G; Gum, Jeffrey L; Hart, Robert A; Kelly, Michael P; Daniels, Alan H; Ames, Christopher P; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Kebaish, Khaled M; and the International Spine Study GroupStudy design
Retrospective review.Objectives
The aim of this study was to define a surgical invasiveness threshold that predicts major complications after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery; use this threshold to categorize patients into quartiles by invasiveness; and determine the odds of major complications by quartile.Summary of background data
Understanding the relationship between surgical invasiveness and major complications is important for estimating the likelihood of major complications after ASD surgery.Methods
Using a multicenter database, we identified 574 ASD patients (more than 5 levels fused; mean age, 60 ± 15 years) with minimum 2-year follow-up. Invasiveness was calculated as the ASD Surgical and Radiographic (ASD-SR) score. Youden index was used to identify the invasiveness score cut-off associated with optimal sensitivity and specificity for predicting major complications. Resulting high- and low-invasiveness groups were divided in half to create quartiles. Odds of developing a major complication were analyzed for each quartile using logistic regression (alpha = 0.05).Results
The ASD-SR cutoff score that maximally predicted major complications was 90 points. ASD-SR quartiles were 0 to 65 (Q1), 66 to 89 (Q2), 90 to 119 (Q3), and ≥120 (Q4). Risk of a major complication was 17% in Q1, 21% in Q2, 35% in Q3, and 33% in Q4 (P < 0.001). Comparisons of adjacent quartiles showed an increase in the odds of a major complication from Q2 to Q3 (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.0), but not from Q1 to Q2 or from Q3 to Q4. Patients with ASD-SR scores ≥90 were 1.9 times as likely to have a major complication than patients with scores <90 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9). Mean ASD-SR scores above and below 90 points were 121 ± 25 and 63 ± 17, respectively.Conclusion
The odds of major complications after ASD surgery are significantly greater when the procedure has an ASD-SR score ≥90. ASD-SR score can be used to counsel patients regarding these increased odds.Level of Evidence: 3.Item Open Access Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Hart-ISSG Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale.(Spine, 2018-04) Hart, Robert A; Rastegar, Farbod; Contag, Alec; Kane, Marie; Daniels, Alan; Klineberg, Eric; Eastlack, Robert; Smith, Justin S; Hostin, Richard; Hamilton, D Kojo; Gum, Jeffrey L; Burton, Douglas C; Sheer, Justin K; Ames, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Lafage, Virginie; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher; Kebaish, Khaled; and the International Spine Study GroupStudy design
Reliability/external validation study.Objective
Investigate inter- and intrarater reliability of the Hart-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale (PJFSS) and its correlation with operative revision in patients with proximal junctional failure (PJF).Summary of background data
The Hart-ISSG PJFSS is a validated classification system for PJF. Reliability of the PJFSS has not been assessed.Methods
Sixteen detailed clinical scenarios were assessed using the ISSG PJFSS classification in six categories: neurologic status, axial pain, instrumentation issue, proximal kyphotic angle, level of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), and severity of UIV/UIV+1 fracture. Eleven spine surgeons evaluated each case in all six categories during two different assessments, and provided recommendations regarding operative revision or observation for each case. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated based on intraclass correlation coefficients.Results
All intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated "almost perfect"' (0.817-0.988) inter-rater agreement for both assessments, except UIV/UIV+1 fracture severity during the second assessment, which demonstrated "substantial" agreement' (0.692). Five of six categories had "almost perfect" mean intrarater reliability (0.805-0.981), while "instrumentation issue" demonstrated "substantial" mean agreement (0.757). Inter-rater reliability for recommendation of surgical intervention was "almost perfect" during both assessments (0.911 and 0.922, respectively). Mean PJFSS scores between the two assessments were significantly higher for cases recommended for operative revision (8.43 ± 0.90) versus cases recommended for observation (P < 0.0001).Conclusion
The ISSG PJFSS is a reliable and repeatable classification system for assessing patients with PJF. Higher PJFSS scales correlate with recommendation for operative revision, extending prior external validation of the PJFSS.Level of evidence
3.