Browsing by Subject "disparities"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A cross-sectional survey study of United States residency program directors' perceptions of parental leave and pregnancy among anesthesiology trainees.(Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2021-06-22) Sharpe, Emily E; Ku, Cindy; Malinzak, Elizabeth B; Kraus, Molly B; Chandrabose, Rekha; Hartlage, Sarah EH; Hanson, Andrew C; Schulte, Phillip J; Pearson, Amy CSPurpose
Little is known about program directors' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding parental leave policies in anesthesiology training. This study sought to understand program director perceptions about the effects of pregnancy and parental leave on resident training, skills, and productivity.Methods
An online 43-question survey was developed to evaluate United States anesthesiology program directors' perceptions of parental leave policies. The survey included questions regarding demographics, anesthesiology program characteristics, parental leave policies, call coverage, and the perceived effects of parental leave on resident performance. Data were collected by Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA).Results
Fifty-six of 145 (39%) anesthesiology program directors completed the survey. Forty-eight of 54 (89%) program directors had a female resident take maternity leave in the past three years. When asked how parental leave affects residents' futures, 24/50 (48%) program directors felt it delayed board certification and 28/50 (56%) thought it affected fellowship opportunities. Program directors were split on their perceived impact of becoming a parent on a trainee's work. Yet, when compared with male trainees, program directors perceived that becoming a parent negatively affected female trainees' timeliness, technical skills, scholarly activities, procedural volume, and standardized test scores and affected training experience of co-residents. Program directors perceived no difference in impact on female trainees' dedication to patients and clinical performance.Conclusions
Program directors perceived that becoming a parent negatively affects the work performance of female but not male trainees. These negative perceptions could impact evaluations and future plans of female residents.Item Open Access An innovative educational program for addressing health disparities in translational cancer research.(Journal of clinical and translational science, 2020-11) Oldham, Carla E; Gathings, MJ; Devi, Gayathri R; Patierno, Steven R; Williams, Kevin P; Hough, Holly J; Barrett, Nadine JNorth Carolina Central University (NCCU) and Duke Cancer Institute implemented an NCI-funded Translational Cancer Disparities Research Partnership to enhance translational cancer research, increase the pool of underrepresented racial and ethnic group (UREG) researchers in the translational and clinical research workforce, and equip UREG trainees with skills to increase diversity in clinical trials. The Cancer Research Education Program (C-REP) provided training for UREG graduate students and postdoctoral fellows at Duke and NCCU. An innovative component of C-REP is the Translational Immersion Experience (TIE), which enabled Scholars to gain knowledge across eight domains of clinical and translational research (clinical trials operations, data monitoring, regulatory affairs, UREG accrual, biobanking, community engagement, community outreach, and high-throughput drug screening). Program-specific evaluative metrics were created for three broad domains (clinical operations, basic science/lab research, and population-based science) and eight TIE domains. Two cohorts (n = 13) completed pre- and post-surveys to determine program impact and identify recommendations for program improvement. Scholars reported statistically significant gains in knowledge across three broad domains of biomedical research and seven distinct areas within TIE. Training in translational research incorporating immersions in clinical trials operation, biobanking, drug development, and community engagement adds value to career development of UREG researchers.Item Open Access Geographic and Racial Disparities in Infant Hearing Loss.(Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2018-10-09) Lantos, Paul M; Maradiaga-Panayotti, Gabriela; Barber, Xavier; Raynor, Eileen; Tucci, Debara; Hoffman, Kate; Permar, Sallie R; Jackson, Pearce; Hughes, Brenna L; Kind, Amy; Swamy, Geeta KObjective Approximately 1 to 2 of every 1000 American newborns has hearing loss identified by newborn screening. This study was designed to determine if infant hearing loss is more common in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Study Design In this retrospective study, we analyzed electronic medical record data using geostatistical models. Setting Infants were residents of Durham County, North Carolina, born in 2 hospitals of the Duke University Health System. This county includes the city of Durham and surrounding suburban and rural communities. Subjects and Methods Subjects were hearing-screened newborns, born between 2005 and 2016, whose residential address was in Durham County, North Carolina. This was a retrospective study using medical record data. We used Bayesian regression models with smoothing of coordinate date to identify both spatial and nonspatial predictors of infant hearing loss. Results We identified 19,348 infants from Durham County, of whom 675 had failed initial hearing screening and 191 had hearing loss confirmed on follow-up. Hearing loss was significantly associated with minority race (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-3.06), as well as lower gestational age and maternal sexually transmitted infections. We identified significant geographic heterogeneity, with a higher probability of hearing loss in poorer urban neighborhoods (local OR range, 0.59-1.39). Neighborhood disadvantage was a significant predictor of hearing loss, as was high local seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) among pregnant women. Conclusions Urban, low-income neighborhoods have a high prevalence of infant hearing loss compared with more affluent surrounding communities, particularly among minorities. This distribution may be attributable to congenital CMV infection.Item Open Access Geographic Disparities in Mortality Risk Within a Racially Diverse Sample of U.S. Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury.(Health Equity, 2018-01) Dismuke-Greer, Clara E; Gebregziabher, Mulugeta; Ritchwood, Tiarney; Pugh, Mary Jo; Walker, Rebekah J; Uchendu, Uche S; Egede, Leonard EPurpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a signature injury among the U.S. veterans. Hispanic U.S. veterans diagnosed with TBI have been found to have higher risk-adjusted mortality. This study examined the adjusted association of geographic location with all-cause mortality in 114,593 veterans diagnosed with TBI between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010, and followed through December 31, 2014. Methods: National Veterans Health Administration (VHA) databases containing administrative data including International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes, sociodemographic characteristics, and survival were linked. TBI was identified based on ICD-9 codes. Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used to examine the association of time from first TBI ICD-9 code to death with geographic location, after adjustment for TBI severity, race/ethnicity, other sociodemographic characteristics, military factors, and Elixhauser comorbidities. Results: Relative to urban mainland veterans with a median survival of 76.4 months, veterans living in the U.S. territories had a median survival of 69.1 months, whereas rural mainland veterans had a median survival of 77.1 months, and highly rural mainland veterans had a mean survival of 77.6 months. The final model adjusted for race/ethnicity, TBI severity, sociodemographic, military, and comorbidity covariates showed that residing in the U.S. territories was associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratios=1.24; 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.34) relative to residing on the U.S. mainland. The race/ethnicity disparity previously found for the U.S. veterans diagnosed with TBI seems to be accounted for by living in the U.S. territories. Conclusion: The study shows that among veterans with TBI, mortality rates were higher in those who reside in the U.S. territories, even after adjustment. Previous documented higher mortality among Hispanic veterans seems to be explained by residing in the U.S. territories. The VA has a mission of ensuring equitable treatment of all veterans, and should investigate targeted policies and interventions to improve the survival of the U.S. territory veterans diagnosed with TBI.Item Open Access Racial disparities in inpatient clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes in brain metastasis(Neuro-Oncology Practice, 2022) McCray, Edwin; Waguia, Romaric; de la Garza Ramos, Rafael; Price, Meghan J; Williamson, Theresa; Dalton, Tara; Sciubba, Daniel M; Yassari, Reza; Goodwin, Andrea N; Fecci, Peter; Johnson, Margaret O; Chaichana, Kaisorn; Goodwin, C RoryAbstract Background Few studies have assessed the impact of race on short-term patient outcomes in the brain metastasis population. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association of race with inpatient clinical presentation, treatment, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality rates for patients with brain metastases (BM). Method Using data collected from the National Inpatient Sample between 2004 and 2014, we retrospectively identified adult patients with a primary diagnosis of BM. Outcomes included nonroutine discharge, prolonged length of stay (pLOS), in-hospital complications, and mortality. Results Minority (Black, Hispanic/other) patients were less likely to receive surgical intervention compared to White patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.74, p < 0.001; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84–0.93, p < 0.001). Black patients were more likely to develop an in-hospital complication than White patients (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.28–1.41, p < 0.001). Additionally, minority patients were more likely to experience pLOS than White patients (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.41–1.57, p < 0.001; OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.27–1.42, p < 0.001). Black patients were more likely to experience a nonroutine discharge (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.19–1.31, p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality than White (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03–1.23, p = 0.008). Conclusion Our analysis demonstrated that race is associated with disparate short-term outcomes in patients with BM. More efforts are needed to address these disparities, provide equitable care, and allow for similar outcomes regardless of care.Item Open Access Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in Novel Coronavirus (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) Test Positivity in North Carolina.(Open forum infectious diseases, 2021-01) Turner, Nicholas A; Pan, William; Martinez-Bianchi, Viviana S; Panayotti, Gabriela M Maradiaga; Planey, Arrianna M; Woods, Christopher W; Lantos, Paul MBackground
Emerging evidence suggests that black and Hispanic communities in the United States are disproportionately affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A complex interplay of socioeconomic and healthcare disparities likely contribute to disproportionate COVID-19 risk.Methods
We conducted a geospatial analysis to determine whether individual- and neighborhood-level attributes predict local odds of testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We analyzed 29 138 SARS-CoV-2 tests within the 6-county catchment area for Duke University Health System from March to June 2020. We used generalized additive models to analyze the spatial distribution of SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Adjusted models included individual-level age, gender, and race, as well as neighborhood-level Area Deprivation Index, population density, demographic composition, and household size.Results
Our dataset included 27 099 negative and 2039 positive unique SARS-CoV-2 tests. The odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were higher for males (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.30-1.58), blacks (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.27-1.70), and Hispanics (OR, 4.25; 955 CI, 3.55-5.12). Among neighborhood-level predictors, percentage of black population (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25), and percentage Hispanic population (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41) also influenced the odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Population density, average household size, and Area Deprivation Index were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 test results after adjusting for race.Conclusions
The odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 were higher for both black and Hispanic individuals, as well as within neighborhoods with a higher proportion of black or Hispanic residents-confirming that black and Hispanic communities are disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2.