Browsing by Subject "invasive aspergillosis"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Blood Aspergillus PCR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
    (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-01) Egger, Matthias; Jenks, Jeffrey D; Hoenigl, Martin; Prattes, Juergen
    Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) is one of the most common invasive fungal diseases and is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality. In order to maximize patient outcomes and survival, early and rapid diagnosis has been shown to be pivotal. Hence, diagnostic tools aiding and improving the diagnostic process are ambitiously searched for. In this context, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may represent a potential candidate. Its additional value and benefits in diagnosis have been demonstrated and are scientifically established. Nevertheless, standardized and widespread usage is sparse because several factors influence diagnostic quality and need to be considered in order to optimize diagnostic performance and outcome. In the following review, the current role of PCR in the diagnosis of IA is explored, with special focus on the strengths and limitations of PCR in different settings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Immune Parameters for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring in Invasive Mold Infection.
    (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Rawlings, Stephen A; Garcia-Vidal, Carol; Koehler, Philipp; Mercier, Toine; Prattes, Juergen; Lass-Flörl, Cornelia; Martin-Gomez, M Teresa; Buchheidt, Dieter; Pagano, Livio; Gangneux, Jean-Pierre; van de Veerdonk, Frank L; Netea, Mihai G; Carvalho, Agostinho; Hoenigl, Martin
    Infections caused by invasive molds, including Aspergillus spp., can be difficult to diagnose and remain associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thus, early diagnosis and targeted systemic antifungal treatment remains the most important predictive factor for a successful outcome in immunocompromised individuals with invasive mold infections. Diagnosis remains difficult due to low sensitivities of diagnostic tests including culture and other mycological tests for mold pathogens, particularly in patients on mold-active antifungal prophylaxis. As a result, antifungal treatment is rarely targeted and reliable markers for treatment monitoring and outcome prediction are missing. Thus, there is a need for improved markers to diagnose invasive mold infections, monitor response to treatment, and assist in determining when antifungal therapy should be escalated, switched, or can be stopped. This review focuses on the role of immunologic markers and specifically cytokines in diagnosis and treatment monitoring of invasive mold infections.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Impact of Changes of the 2020 Consensus Definitions of Invasive Aspergillosis on Clinical Trial Design: Unintended Consequences for Prevention Trials?
    (Open forum infectious diseases, 2021-10) Wingard, John R; Alexander, Barbara D; Baden, Lindsey R; Chen, Min; Sugrue, Michele W; Leather, Helen L; Caliendo, Angela M; Clancy, Cornelius J; Denning, David W; Marty, Francisco M; Nguyen, M Hong; Wheat, L Joseph; Logan, Brent R; Horowitz, Mary M; Marr, Kieren A

    Background

    Consensus definitions for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) were updated in 2020 to increase the certainty of IFD for inclusion in clinical trials, for instance by increasing biomarker cutoff limits to define positivity. To date, there is a paucity of data as to the impact of the revised definitions on clinical trials.

    Methods

    In this study, we sought to determine the impact of the new definitions on classifying invasive aspergillosis (IA), the most common invasive mold disease in immunocompromised patients. We reclassified 226 proven and probable IA cases plus 139 possible IFD cases in the Aspergillus Technology Consortium (AsTeC) and in an antifungal prophylaxis trial (BMT CTN 0101) using the new criteria.

    Results

    Fewer cases met the more stringent diagnostic 2020 criteria after applying the reclassification criteria to define probable IA. Of 188 evaluable probable cases, 41 (22%) were reclassified to 40 possible IA and 1 probable IFD. Reclassification to possible IFD occurred in 22% of hematologic malignancy (HM) patients, 29% of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients, and in no lung transplant (LT) patients. Date of diagnosis was established a median (range) of 3 (1-105) days later in 15% of probable IA cases using the new criteria. Applying the new definitions to the BMT CTN 0101 trial, the power to detect the same odds ratio decreased substantially.

    Conclusions

    The updated IA consensus definitions may impact future trial designs, especially for antifungal prophylaxis studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Treatment of Aspergillosis.
    (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2018-08) Jenks, Jeffrey D; Hoenigl, Martin
    Infections caused by Aspergillus spp. remain associated with high morbidity and mortality. While mold-active antifungal prophylaxis has led to a decrease of occurrence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in those patients most at risk for infection, breakthrough IA does occur and remains difficult to diagnose due to low sensitivities of mycological tests for IA. IA is also increasingly observed in other non-neutropenic patient groups, where clinical presentation is atypical and diagnosis remains challenging. Early and targeted systemic antifungal treatment remains the most important predictive factor for a successful outcome in immunocompromised individuals. Recent guidelines recommend voriconazole and/or isavuconazole for the primary treatment of IA, with liposomal amphotericin B being the first alternative, and posaconazole, as well as echinocandins, primarily recommended for salvage treatment. Few studies have evaluated treatment options for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), where long-term oral itraconazole or voriconazole remain the treatment of choice.