Browsing by Subject "minimally invasive"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access A Novel Approach to Percutaneous Lumbar Surgeries via Kambin's Triangle - A Radiographic and Surgical Planning Analysis with Nerve Segmentation Technology.(World neurosurgery, 2023-06) Tabarestani, Troy Q; Sykes, David AW; Kouam, Romaric W; Salven, David S; Wang, Timothy Y; Mehta, Vikram A; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Wiggins, Walter F; Chi, John H; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad MObjective
While Kambin's triangle has become an ever more important anatomic window given its proximity to the exiting nerve root, there have been limited studies examining the effect of disease on the corridor. Our goal was to better understand how pathology can affect Kambin's triangle thereby altering laterality of approach for percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion (percLIF).Methods
The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of patients evaluated for percLIF. The areas of Kambin's triangle were measured without and with nerve segmentation. For the latter, the lumbosacral nerve roots on 3D T2 MRI were manually segmented. Next, the borders of Kambin's triangle were delineated ensuring no overlap between the area and the nerve above.Results
15 patients (67.5 ± 9.7 years, 46.7% female) were retrospectively reviewed. 150 Kambin's triangles were measured. The mean areas from L1-S1 were 50.0 ± 12.3 mm2, 73.8 ± 12.5 mm2, 83.8 ± 12.2 mm2, 88.5 ± 19.0 mm2, and 116 ± 29.3 mm2, respectively. When pathology was present, the areas significantly decreased at L4-L5 (p = 0.046) and L5-S1 (p = 0.049). Higher spondylolisthesis and smaller posterior disc heights were linked with decreased areas via linear regression analysis (p < 0.05). When nerve segmentation was used, the areas were significantly smaller from L1-L5 (p < 0.05). Among 11 patients who underwent surgery, none suffered from postoperative neuropathies.Conclusion
These results illustrate the feasibility of pre-operatively segmenting lumbosacral nerves and measuring Kambin's triangle to help guide surgical planning and determine the ideal laterality of approach for percLIF.Item Open Access Incremental benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery for increasingly frail patients with adult spinal deformity.(Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2023-04) Passias, Peter G; Tretiakov, Peter S; Nunley, Pierce D; Wang, Michael Y; Park, Paul; Kanter, Adam S; Okonkwo, David O; Eastlack, Robert K; Mundis, Gregory M; Chou, Dean; Agarwal, Nitin; Fessler, Richard G; Uribe, Juan S; Anand, Neel; Than, Khoi D; Brusko, Gregory; Fu, Kai-Ming; Turner, Jay D; Le, Vivian P; Line, Breton G; Ames, Christopher P; Smith, Justin S; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Hart, Robert A; Burton, Douglas; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie; Schwab, Frank; Bess, Shay; Mummaneni, Praveen VObjective
Circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) may provide incremental benefits compared with open surgery for patients with increasing frailty status by decreasing peri- and postoperative complications.Methods
Operative patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) ≥ 18 years old with baseline and 2-year postoperative data were assessed. With propensity score matching, patients who underwent cMIS (cMIS group) were matched with similar patients who underwent open surgery (open group) based on baseline BMI, C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and S1 pelvic tilt. The Passias modified ASD frailty index (mASD-FI) was used to determine patient frailty stratification as not frail, frail, or severely frail. Baseline and postoperative factors were assessed using two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and multivariate ANCOVA while controlling for baseline age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and number of levels fused.Results
After propensity score matching, 170 ASD patients (mean age 62.71 ± 13.64 years, 75.0% female, mean BMI 29.25 ± 6.60 kg/m2) were included, split evenly between the cMIS and open groups. Surgically, patients in the open group had higher numbers of posterior levels fused (p = 0.021) and were more likely to undergo three-column osteotomies (p > 0.05). Perioperatively, cMIS patients had lower intraoperative blood loss and decreased use of cell saver across frailty groups (with adjustment for baseline age, CCI score, and levels fused), as well as fewer perioperative complications (p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis also revealed that compared to open patients, increasingly frail patients in the cMIS group were also more likely to demonstrate greater improvement in 1- and 2-year postoperative scores for the Oswestry Disability Index, SRS-36 (total), EQ-5D and SF-36 (all p < 0.05). With regard to postoperative complications, increasingly frail patients in the cMIS group were also noted to experience significantly fewer complications overall (p = 0.036) and fewer major intraoperative complications (p = 0.039). The cMIS patients were also less likely to need a reoperation than their open group counterparts (p = 0.043).Conclusions
Surgery performed with a cMIS technique may offer acceptable outcomes, with diminishment of perioperative complications and mitigation of catastrophic outcomes, in increasingly frail patients who may not be candidates for surgery using traditional open techniques. However, further studies should be performed to investigate the long-term impact of less optimal alignment in this population.Item Open Access Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for lumbar corpectomy and fusion with posterior instrumentation.(Neurosurgical focus: Video, 2022-07) Srinivasan, Ethan S; Wang, Timothy Y; Rapoport, Anna; Erickson, Melissa M; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Than, Khoi DIn this video, the authors highlight the operative treatment of a 55-year-old man with chronic osteomyelitis discitis. The operation entailed a minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for L3 and L4 corpectomies, L2-5 interbody fusion, and L2-5 minimally invasive posterior instrumentation. The operation proceeded in two stages, beginning in the lateral position with corpectomy of the L3 and L4 vertebral bodies and placement of a corpectomy cage. After closure of this access wound, the patient was turned to a prone position for the posterior element of the operation. Posterior instrumentation was placed with pedicle screws at L2 and L5. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.3.FOCVID2210.Item Open Access Pushing the Limits of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery-From Preoperative to Intraoperative to Postoperative Management.(Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-04) Drossopoulos, Peter N; Sharma, Arnav; Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C; Tabarestani, Troy Q; Bartlett, Alyssa M; Wang, Timothy Y; Huie, David; Gottfried, Oren; Blitz, Jeanna; Erickson, Melissa; Lad, Shivanand P; Bullock, W Michael; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad MThe introduction of minimally invasive surgery ushered in a new era of spine surgery by minimizing the undue iatrogenic injury, recovery time, and blood loss, among other complications, of traditional open procedures. Over time, technological advancements have further refined the care of the operative minimally invasive spine patient. Moreover, pre-, and postoperative care have also undergone significant change by way of artificial intelligence risk stratification, advanced imaging for surgical planning and patient selection, postoperative recovery pathways, and digital health solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges persist necessitating ongoing research and collaboration to further optimize patient care in minimally invasive spine surgery.