Browsing by Subject "sea turtle"
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Acoustic Ecology of Sea Turtles: Implications for Conservation(2012) Piniak, Wendy Erin DowAn understanding of sensory ecology, how animals receive and respond to their environment, can be a powerful tool for the conservation of endangered species because it can allow us to assess the potential success of actions designed to mitigate particular threats. We have a general understanding of how sea turtles perceive and respond to certain visual, magnetic, and chemical cues, but we understand very little about how they perceive and respond to acoustic cues. This dissertation explores the acoustic ecology of sea turtles, focusing on their auditory capabilities, responses to acoustic stimuli and the implications of this knowledge for their conservation. I measured the underwater and aerial hearing sensitivities of juvenile green (Chelonia mydas), hatchling leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and hatchling hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles by recording auditory evoked potential responses to tonal stimuli. Green turtles detected tonal stimuli between 50 and 1,600 Hz underwater (maximum sensitivity: 200-400 Hz) and 50 and 800 Hz in air (maximum sensitivity: 300-400 Hz), leatherbacks detected tonal stimuli between 50 and 1,200 Hz underwater (maximum sensitivity: 100-400 Hz) and 50 and 1,600 Hz in air (maximum sensitivity: 50-400Hz), and hawksbills detected tonal stimuli between 50 and 1,600 Hz in both media (maximum sensitivity: 200-400 Hz). Sea turtles were more sensitive to aerial than underwater stimuli when audiograms were compared in terms of sound pressure, but they were more sensitive to underwater stimuli when audiograms were compared in terms of sound intensity. I also examined the behavioral responses of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) to simulated low frequency acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) and found that these turtles exhibited a mild, aversive response to these sounds. This finding indicates that low frequency tonal ADDs have the potential to warn sea turtles of the presence of fishing gear and suggest that field tests of ADDs are warranted. Finally, I conducted a comprehensive review of our knowledge of the acoustic ecology of sea turtles, examined the sources of marine anthropogenic sound sea turtles are able to detect, evaluated the potential physiological and behavioral effects of anthropogenic sound, identified data gaps, and made recommendations for future research.
Item Open Access Assessment of Sea Turtle Rehabilitation in North Carolina(2019-04-26) Stevens, BAs is the case with all sea turtle species, the five species that occur within North Carolina waters are listed as either threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Due to their endangered/threatened status, rehabilitation efforts are key for their long-term conservation since the release of healthy individuals helps promote more sustainable populations. In order to ensure rehabilitation efforts are concentrated properly and to assess their success rates, in-depth studies must be done on the stranding records available for each rehabilitation facility within the state. While other states such as Florida and Queensland, Australia have conducted studies to determine their rehabilitation characteristics and success rates, a comprehensive study of a similar nature has never been done with the sea turtle rehabilitation records for the state of North Carolina. This study analyzes the rehabilitation records for the state of North Carolina to determine the most common characteristics of sea turtles admitted for rehabilitation as well as the successful release rates over time. Sea turtle rehabilitation efforts and record keeping began at the North Carolina Aquariums back in the mid-1980s which was soon followed by the opening of the Karen Beasley Sea Turtle Rescue and Rehabilitation Center in 1997. The North Carolina Aquarium on Roanoke Island partnered early with the Network for Endangered Sea Turtles (N.E.S.T.) which eventually became the Sea Turtle Animal Rescue(STAR) Center in 2014. Both the North Carolina Aquariums and the KBSTRRC largely outsourced any necessary veterinary care through a collaboration with North Carolina State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine though the North Carolina Aquariums hired its first full-time veterinarian for sea turtle care in 2015. This study reviews the rehabilitation records of North Carolina to date, presented as two datasets taken from the public North Carolina Aquariums and the private, non-profit Karen Beasley Sea Turtle Rescue and Rehabilitation Center (KBSTRRC). A total of 2707 rehabilitation records were available which was narrowed down to 2594 records for data analysis after a variety of factors including the restriction of the time period used to only include those records from January 1997 to October 2018. Characteristics were determined for the majority of rehabilitation records such as: life stage, sex, stranding causation, stranding location, species, rehabilitation location, rehabilitation outcome, and release location. The successful rate of release was determined and compared against studies done in Florida and Queensland, Australia for comparative purposes. Based on the 2707 records available, both life stage and sex were removed as variables in future data analysis due to skewed proportions for turtles in their juvenile life stage as well as those that did not have their sex determined during rehabilitation. When looking at the restricted 2594 records, the most common sea turtle brought in for rehabilitation in North Carolina was a green sea turtle species, stranded in inshore waters (landward of the Coast Guard’s COLREGS line) due to cold stunning, and successfully released. The most common rehabilitation facility used was the North Carolina Aquarium on Roanoke Island and its affiliates followed by the Karen Beasley Sea Turtle Rescue and Rehabilitation Center, and the North Carolina State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine based in the Center For Marine Sciences and Technology (CMAST). When compared to the other studies looked at, the successful release rate for North Carolina was nearly double the successful release rates seen in both Florida and Queensland, Australia. The results discussed in this study will help rehabilitation facilities in North Carolina better tailor resources and funds to accommodate the most commonly seen characteristics as well as provide a baseline to be compared against for future data analysis within North Carolina, other states, or when looking specifically at one rehabilitation facility.Item Open Access Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation of Sea Turtles in the North Atlantic Ocean(2009) McClellan, Catherine MarieSea turtles have experienced dramatic population declines during the last century as a consequence of direct harvest, by-catch in fisheries, and habitat loss. Despite almost 50 years of partial international protection, several populations of sea turtles are still at imminent risk of extinction. Our knowledge of their complex life histories is still far from complete; these knowledge gaps hinder our ability to provide scientific advice regarding their conservation and management. It is the very complexity of their life histories, which allows them to exploit widely separated habitats during development, often over the course of decades, which makes them inherently difficult to study. I used satellite telemetry (n=60) to investigate the movements and habitat use patterns of juvenile loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green (Chelonia mydas), and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea turtles on their summer feeding grounds in North Carolina estuaries. These turtles migrate into and out of the estuarine waters each spring and autumn, encountering a gauntlet of fishing gear on each journey. The by-catch of sea turtles is an important conservation issue in North Carolina, and throughout the world's oceans. I evaluated conservation measures established to reduce the by-catch of sea turtles in Pamlico Sound's autumnal large-mesh gill net fishery for southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma), using a spatially explicit predator/prey model. My findings indicated that species-specific habitat preferences contributed to a turtles' risk of encountering fishing gear and that areas of high by-catch are predictable from patterns of overlap between sea turtle habitat use and flounder fishing effort. I then examined how the behavior of green turtles affected their vulnerability to incidental capture in estuarine commercial fisheries. Individual green turtles interact with multiple gears per season as a result of strong site fidelity to habitats also preferred by fishers. Telemetry also allowed me to examine individual variation in movements, habitat use, and site fidelity patterns of juvenile loggerhead turtles, both within the estuary and as the turtles migrated out into the North Atlantic. I used these observations to test the hypothesis of a discrete ontogenetic shift in habitat and diet in juvenile loggerheads. Approximately one-third of large juvenile loggerheads tagged in North Carolina estuaries return to oceanic habitat, sometimes for several years, where they are vulnerable to by-catch in pelagic fisheries. This led me to conclude that the long held notion of a discrete ontogenetic habitat shift between the oceanic and neritic habitat was incorrect for juvenile loggerheads (and possibly also for green turtles). Finally, I explored variation in migratory destinations in these animals through multivariate analyses of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in blood plasma and red blood cells, and through analysis of sex, genetic, haplotype, body size, and remigration records, and described the trophic niche of these turtles with Bayesian isotope mixing models. Variation in migratory destination (oceanic or neritic habitat) was best described by stable isotope ratios of nitrogen and remigration tendency. Turtles that returned to the open ocean had significantly lower nitrogen ratios than those animals that remained in the neritic zone and their diets retained a substantial contribution of epipelagic prey items. The diet composition of neritic turtles, on the other hand, consisted primarily of estuarine benthic invertebrates during the summertime and autumn foraging season but shifted toward pelagic jellyfish, fish, and Sargassum during the overwintering period. Oceanic turtles likely came from open ocean regions prior to entering the summer foraging grounds while neritic turtles likely overwintered at the edge of the Gulf Stream. The agreement between the dietary compositions and migration patterns between the two groups of turtles suggest that these feeding and habitat use strategies were persistent characteristics in the turtles I sampled. My work has improved our understanding of sea turtle habitats in North Carolina estuaries and identified their migratory destinations and overwintering habitats. I hope that this work lays the groundwork for future studies that will explore how variation in habitat use and feeding strategies are manifested in life history traits that affect fitness directly, such as survivorship, growth rates, stage durations, and fecundity.
Item Open Access Education and Outreach Development - Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge, St. Croix, USVI(2021-04-26) Jackson, HaleyThe 384-acre Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge on St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, protects important nesting habitat for leatherback, hawksbill, and green sea turtles. The refuge works to create an understanding for sea turtles and their protection through education opportunities and community outreach. To help further this goal of the refuge, I worked closely with refuge and sea turtle biologist to create for them an educational worksheet on sea turtle conservation and outreach material on their different sea turtle programs for distribution around St. Croix. An outreach plan for Sandy Point NWR was designed for the refuge to use in facilitating, organizing, and tracking future programs and events. Posters were also created and will be distributed throughout the US Virgin Islands that aim to educate the public on sea turtle strandings and nesting. Ultimately, these materials will raise awareness of sea turtles in the US Virgin Islands, encourage community participation and wildlife conservation, and provide opportunities for St. Croix students.Item Open Access Hooked! An Analysis of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Recreational Rod and Reel Pier Fishery of North Carolina(2024-04-26) Sajewski, AmandaFisheries bycatch is a major threat to the five species of endangered and threatened sea turtles found in North Carolina’s waters. There are four main outcomes of a bycatch event:acute death, sub-acute death, delayed mortality, or survival. Survival may be accompanied by sub-lethal impacts affecting general fitness of the sea turtle, potentially decreasing reproductive success, the turtle’s ability to forage, and increasing the risk to threats (e.g., boat strike). Post Interaction Mortality (PIM) after interaction with hook and line gear is influenced by hook-type, the ease of removing the hook from the turtle, if hooks (or line) couldn't be removed, and a myriad of environmental factors. While the commercial fishery has measures in place to decrease and mitigate bycatch of sea turtles, there are no such measures for the recreational fisheries of North Carolina. Both commercial and recreational fishing contribute substantially to North Carolina’s coastal economy, and recreational fishing continues to grow, building on a long history of pier fishing on North Carolina’s coast. Taking lessons learned from bycatch mitigation in the commercial longline fishery presents a good starting point for similar studies in the recreational rod and reel fishery. To address a research gap, and in support of a NOAA initiative to better understand and consider how to reduce sea turtle bycatch at recreational fishing sites, I analyzed incidental sea turtle captures in North Carolina reported in the Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage Network (STSSN) database over 15 years. My aim was to examine incidentally captured sea turtle demographics and any trends between reported captures and fishing methods. To complement my historical data analysis I conducted surveys with fishers (anglers) on three piers in Carteret County to investigate cofactors of fishing methods and sea turtle incidental captures in order to make recommendations to inform potential mitigation measures, such as voluntary gear modifications. Historical data were obtained from STSSN from 2008 to 2022. The survey was created by NOAA for their Reducing Sea Turtle Bycatch at Recreational Fishing Sites Project. We sought information about angler habits including fishing methods (hook type, bait type), and frequency of sea turtle interactions. Outreach on the importance of reporting bycaught sea turtles was done opportunistically, most often after the final question: “What would you do if you accidentally caught a sea turtle?”. I directed anglers to the STSSN signs that were posted at the entrance to the pier and discussed the importance of these data, even if the “turtle seems fine.” I conducted data analysis and testing for statistical significance in R, and performed spatial analysis and construction of a publicly available spatial GIS tool through arcGIS Pro. From 2008 to 2022 there were 427 reported interactions with sea turtles with recreational rod and reel fishers from piers in North Carolina. I examined relationships between species, geographical location (county), hook location, hook type, and season. Kemp’s ridley sea turtles represented 60% of reported interactions overall, and based on these reported interactions, are statistically more likely to be caught than any other sea turtle species. Overall the most reported captures occurred in May, though monthly numbers of incidental captures varied by county. Shrimp was the most commonly used bait type in incidental sea turtle captures and j-hooks were the most often reported hook type. Kemp’s ridleys had the highest number and proportion of captures by the mouth. Captures by the mouth comprised the largest percentage of each species' known hook locations; only greens and loggerheads had a nearly equivalent amount of captures by mouth and flipper. I conducted 77 angler surveys in the fall of 2023, capturing data for 150 anglers at three piers in Carteret County: Bogue Inlet Fishing Pier, Oceanana Pier, and Newport River Pier. The 1 first half of the survey covered general fishing habits and preferences. Most fishers interviewed preferred fishing in the spring and fall. Shrimp were statistically more likely to be chosen as bait, and j-hooks most likely to be chosen for hook-type. Twenty-seven percent of respondents spent at least 16 days fishing in at least one season (3 months), while 49% of respondents were only visiting North Carolina, spending 5 days or less at the pier per season. Angler surveys indicated there is likely significant under-reporting due to local fishers perceiving easily dehooked and healthy turtles as unnecessary to report. There are several key points to consider when interpreting the results of this study. First, relationships between co-factors and incidental captures are difficult to reliably determine because little baseline data exist to compare to. When conducted at a state-wide scale, the angler survey data will provide additional background data and therefore allow for better analysis of potential cofactors with incidental captures in the future. Self-reported data always presents challenges, as it is impossible to know whether increases in reports are due to a true increase in incidental takes or if they are due to increased reporting. While attempting to control for the background popularity of j-hooks and shrimp, use of these bait and hook types were not statistically significant, suggesting that those are the most common hook and bait types associated with incidental takes because they are also the most common hook and bait types used at the piers. There was no relationship between where sea turtles are hooked (mouth or flipper) based on hook type. This result is counter to what might be expected from the success of switching to circle hooks in the commercial long-line fishery. A possible explanation is that the circle hooks used by pier anglers weren’t large enough to prevent swallowing the hook. At the end of any good research study, there are more questions to be answered. I will incorporate habitat data into my sea turtle maps to obtain distances of piers to preferred sea turtle habitat. Will this help inform which sea turtle species are most often reported as caught at that pier or the level of incidental captures generally? After answering this question, I will publish the analysis of the historical data including the dashboard tool. I am hoping the dashboard tool can be used to suggest trends that can inform potential mitigation measures. A few potential voluntary measures that could decrease bycatch at the piers in North Carolina include temporary restrictions. One option is to implement temporary closures during the months of highest incidental captures at each pier, for example a temporary closure in May for Carteret and Pender Counties. The other option is to enforce bait restrictions, restrict bait use apart from lures or gotcha plugs during months of highest incidental captures. The finding the captures by the mouth were most common in all species indicates that this may reduce incidental captures of loggerheads, Kemp’s ridleys, and green sea turtles that are likely attracted to the bait as a food item.Item Open Access The Pieces Add Up: Marine Debris Outreach and Education Program for Sea Turtle Conservation in Volusia County, Florida(2022-04-19) Cherry, JenniferIn the past several years, the negative effects of marine debris on wildlife have been increasing. The growing negative impact is evident at veterinarian clinics, wildlife hospitals, and in reports of turtles stranded on beaches. Even in small amounts, marine debris can severely injure or kill marine species. To increase awareness of this issue, I imported data from sea turtle stranding reports and treatment documents compiled by the Marine Science Center Sea Turtle Hospital from the years 2015-2020 into a database, and then analyzed the trends and relationships in the data. The top three trends revealed that most marine debris issues are from monofilament line entanglement, green turtles (Chelonia mydas) are the most impacted species, and there is growth in the threats from marine debris. I used these analyses to create a strategic plan for a marine debris education and outreach program, along with educational materials featuring an interactive simulation activity, in which the participant becomes a conservation team member who evaluates and collects data on stranded sea turtles impacted by marine debris.