ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Rhyme and Reason: Analyses of Dual Retrieval Cues
Abstract
If and only if each single cue uniquely defines its target, a independence model based
on fragment theory can predict the strength of a combined dual cue from the strengths
of its single cue components. If the single cues do not each uniquely define their
target, no single monotonic function can predict the strength of the dual cue from
its components; rather, what matters is the number of possible targets. The probability
of generating a target word was .19 for rhyme cues, .14 for category cues, and .97
for rhyme-plus-category dual cues. Moreover, some pairs of cues had probabilities
of producing their targets of .03 when used individually and 1.00 when used together,
whereas other pairs had moderate probabilities individually and together. The results,
which are interpreted in terms of multiple constraints limiting the number of responses,
show why rhymes, which play a minimal role in laboratory studies of memory, are common
in real-world mnemonics.
Type
Journal articlePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10164Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
David C. Rubin
Juanita M. Kreps Distinguished Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
For .pdfs of all publications click here My main research interest has been in long-term
memory, especially for complex (or "real-world") stimuli. This work includes the study
of autobiographical memory and oral traditions, as w

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info