dc.contributor.author |
Rubin, David C |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wallace, WT |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-05-21T17:07:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1989-07-01 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0278-7393 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10164 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
If and only if each single cue uniquely defines its target, a independence model based
on fragment theory can predict the strength of a combined dual cue from the strengths
of its single cue components. If the single cues do not each uniquely define their
target, no single monotonic function can predict the strength of the dual cue from
its components; rather, what matters is the number of possible targets. The probability
of generating a target word was .19 for rhyme cues, .14 for category cues, and .97
for rhyme-plus-category dual cues. Moreover, some pairs of cues had probabilities
of producing their targets of .03 when used individually and 1.00 when used together,
whereas other pairs had moderate probabilities individually and together. The results,
which are interpreted in terms of multiple constraints limiting the number of responses,
show why rhymes, which play a minimal role in laboratory studies of memory, are common
in real-world mnemonics.
|
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition |
|
dc.title |
Rhyme and Reason: Analyses of Dual Retrieval Cues |
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
pubs.begin-page |
698 |
|
pubs.end-page |
709 |
|
pubs.issue |
4 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke Institute for Brain Sciences |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Institutes and Provost's Academic Units |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Psychology and Neuroscience |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Trinity College of Arts & Sciences |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
University Institutes and Centers |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
pubs.volume |
15 |
|