Contrast in intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse images of radiofrequency ablation lesions.
Abstract
We have previously shown that intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)
imaging visualizes tissue stiffness changes caused by radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
The objectives of this in vivo study were to (1) quantify measured ARFI-induced displacements
in RFA lesion and unablated myocardium and (2) calculate the lesion contrast (C) and
contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in two-dimensional ARFI and conventional intracardiac
echo images. In eight canine subjects, an ARFI imaging-electroanatomical mapping system
was used to map right atrial ablation lesion sites and guide the acquisition of ARFI
images at these sites before and after ablation. Readers of the ARFI images identified
lesion sites with high sensitivity (90.2%) and specificity (94.3%) and the average
measured ARFI-induced displacements were higher at unablated sites (11.23 ± 1.71 µm)
than at ablated sites (6.06 ± 0.94 µm). The average lesion C (0.29 ± 0.33) and CNR
(1.83 ± 1.75) were significantly higher for ARFI images than for spatially registered
conventional B-mode images (C = -0.03 ± 0.28, CNR = 0.74 ± 0.68).
Type
Journal articleSubject
acoustic radiation force impulse imagingcardiac radiofrequency ablation
electroanatomical mapping
intracardiac echocardiography
Animals
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Catheter Ablation
Dogs
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Heart Atria
Image Enhancement
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Male
Sensitivity and Specificity
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10368Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1177/0161734613519602Publication Info
Eyerly, Stephanie A; Bahnson, Tristram D; Koontz, Jason I; Bradway, David P; Dumont,
Douglas M; Trahey, Gregg E; & Wolf, Patrick D (2014). Contrast in intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse images of radiofrequency
ablation lesions. Ultrason Imaging, 36(2). pp. 133-148. 10.1177/0161734613519602. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10368.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Tristram Dan Bahnson
Professor of Medicine
David Bradway
Research Scientist
David P. Bradway is a research scientist in the Biomedical Engineering Department at
Duke University. He earned his Ph.D. in biomedical engineering in 2013 from Duke.
Afterward, he was a guest postdoc at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), supported
by a Whitaker International Program Scholarship. He has conducted research internships
at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Volcano Corporation, and Siemens Healthcare, working
on ultrasound research since 2002.
Jason Koontz
Associate Professor of Medicine
Gregg E. Trahey
Robert Plonsey Distinguished Professor of Biomedical Engineering
My laboratory develops and evaluates novel ultrasonic imaging methods. Current projects
involve high resolutioon imaging of the breast and mechanical characterization of
the breast and cardiovascular system. We conduct phantom, animal, ex vivo and in
vivo trials. Current clinical trials involve imaging of soft and hard vascular plaques
and mecahnical imaging of breast lesions.
Patrick D. Wolf
Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering
My research is primarily in the area of advanced instrumentation for diagnosis and
treatment of electrophysiological problems. This research covers two primary organ
systems: the heart and the brain.
One thrust of the cardiac-based work is centered on atrial fibrillation and in particular
on very low energy atrial defibrillation strategies. The goal is to produce a device
that can defibrillate the atria with a painless series of electrical impulses. A second
area of interest is the st
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info