ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
PINOT NOIR: pulmonic insufficiency improvement with nitric oxide inhalational response.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair and pulmonary valvotomy for pulmonary
stenosis (PS) lead to progressive pulmonary insufficiency (PI), right ventricular
enlargement and dysfunction. This study assessed whether pulmonary regurgitant fraction
measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) could be reduced with inhaled
nitric oxide (iNO). METHODS: Patients with at least moderate PI by echocardiography
undergoing clinically indicated CMR were prospectively enrolled. Patients with residual
hemodynamic lesions were excluded. Ventricular volume and blood flow sequences were
obtained at baseline and during administration of 40 ppm iNO. RESULTS: Sixteen patients
(11 with repaired TOF and 5 with repaired PS) completed the protocol with adequate
data for analysis. The median age [range] was 35 [19-46] years, BMI was 26 ± 5 kg/m(2)
(mean ± SD), 50% were women and 75% were in NYHA class I. Right ventricular end diastolic
volume index for the cohort was 157 ± 33 mL/m(2), end systolic volume index was 93
± 20 mL/m(2) and right ventricular ejection fraction was 40 ± 6%. Baseline pulmonary
regurgitant volume was 45 ± 25 mL/beat and regurgitant fraction was 35 ± 16%. During
administration of iNO, regurgitant volume was reduced by an average of 6 ± 9% (p=0.01)
and regurgitant fraction was reduced by an average of 5 ± 8% (p=0.02). No significant
changes were observed in ventricular indices for either the left or right ventricle.
CONCLUSION: iNO was successfully administered during CMR acquisition and appears to
reduce regurgitant fraction in patients with at least moderate PI suggesting a potential
role for selective pulmonary vasodilator therapy in these patients. TRIALS REGISTRATION:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00543933.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Administration, InhalationAdult
Balloon Valvuloplasty
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Nitric Oxide
Ohio
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Valve
Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency
Pulmonary Valve Stenosis
Stroke Volume
Tetralogy of Fallot
Treatment Outcome
Vasodilator Agents
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Function, Right
Young Adult
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10997Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1186/1532-429X-15-75Publication Info
Hart, Stephen A; Devendra, Ganesh P; Kim, Yuli Y; Flamm, Scott D; Kalahasti, Vidyasagar;
Arruda, Janine; ... Krasuski, Richard A (2013). PINOT NOIR: pulmonic insufficiency improvement with nitric oxide inhalational response.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 15. pp. 75. 10.1186/1532-429X-15-75. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10997.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Richard Andrew Krasuski
Professor of Medicine
Dr. Richard Krasuski is Director of the Adult Congenital Heart Center at Duke University
Medical Center, the Director of Hemodynamic Research, and the Medical Director of
the CTEPH Program. He is considered a thought leader in the fields of pulmonary hypertension
and congenital heart disease. His research focus is in epidemiologic and clinical
studies involving patients with pulmonary hypertension and patients with congenital
heart disease. He is involved in multiple multicenter studies thr

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info